Taxonomy...........

Yuri Barros

Member
Hi guys.............

Few days ago I made this vídeo...............about what I think on Anemonefish Taxonomy..................

The approach : SUBSPECIES................

Not described properly...........not valid............ and some people do not agree with SUBSPECIES concept..............

But.............this is my own view.................based on Biogeography..........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUjME25A7_0
 
We gonna see new TAXA................I mean...........there are some new TAXA that are gonna be presented here..................

The TAXA are new...........but it doesn´t mean that they are SPECIES or SUBSPECIES.................................

Classification is according its Biogeographical CONTEXT.............

The TAXA could be a new SPECIES (binominal)............or a new SUBSPECIES (trinominal).................
 
TOMATO COMPLEX (Genus)

5 species (9 TAXA)........

Amphiprion melanopus have 5 distinct Biogeographic forms...................that could be classified as subspecies.............


# 1 ) Amphiprion melanopus (Bleeker, 1852) (subspecies)

# 2 ) Amphiprion melanopus (Bleeker, 1852) (subspecies)

# 3 ) Amphiprion melanopus (Bleeker, 1852) (subspecies)

# 4 ) Amphiprion melanopus (Bleeker, 1852) (subspecies)

# 5 ) Amphiprion melanopus (Bleeker, 1852) (subspecies)

# 6 ) Amphiprion barberi (Allen, Drew & Kaufman, 2008)

# 7 ) Amphiprion rubrocinctus (Richardson, 1842)

# 8 ) Amphiprion frenatus (Brevoort, 1856)

# 9 ) Amphiprion ephippium (Bloch, 1790)


picture.php
 
Hi Phill..............

I think that I made exactly what they did not made......

This is na extract from the text you post........

"We did not take into account the distribution of the
species in this study. Geographical isolation, coupled
with ecological differentiation, could also be at the origin
of the evolutionary pattern found here."



I only use Morphology and the Analysis of the Biogeographical Context............including analysis of Sea Currents...................and Geology..................to do this study......................
 
The first study was based on the clowns association with specific anemones being a driving force behind speciation. They conceded that geographical separation will also cause speciation.

I just thought that if you are trying to show relationships or differences in clowns based on their geographic separation, you might want to back up your reasoning with some genetic evidence instead of just morphological differences.

For example: Many people have felt A. nigripes should be classed with the skunk clowns. After keeping them, I felt they should be grouped with the tomato clowns. It turns out they more closely related to Allardii and bicintus.
Most people put A. akindynos in with the Clarkii clowns. It turns out that they should be part of the tomato complex.
 
Yes.........

I put Nigripes along with BICINCTUS GROUP..........check my view on them....

picture.php


About Allard´s...........I group it along with only A. latifasciatus.............

picture.php


A. akindynos I group it only with A. mccullochi.............

picture.php
 
Clark´s are separated from the others due the hability to change color according Anemone species................

I´m talking about Melanism related with Stichodactyla mertensii and Stichodactyla haddoni...........

Here they are.........12 TAXA..............

CLARK´S COMPLEX..........

picture.php


CLARK´S COMPLEX RADIATION.............

picture.php


Also they are divided in two groups..............

YELLOW TAIL GROUP..........

picture.php


RADIATION OF YELLOW TAIL GROUP............

picture.php


WHITE TAIL GROUP..............

picture.php


RADIATION OF WHITE TAIL GROUP...........

picture.php
 
Back
Top