<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10291778#post10291778 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by hubris007
I don't care what everyone else says, i think it's KI-toe.
Based on what? Are you pronouncing it in reconstructed ancient Roman Latin, which has only been around for less than a hundred years? It's only since the early 20th century that some Latin scholars started pronouncing
Veni, vedi, vici as WAY-nee, WEE-dee, WEE-kee instead of VAY-nee, VEE-dee, VEE-chee, and pronouncing
Caesar as Kaiser instead of CHAY-sahr.
I'm pretty sure
chaeto didn't exist as a word in classical Latin. It appears to be from the Greek.
The
ch is pronounced as
k. The
ae is pronounced as
e in scientific Latin and in Southern Continental Pronunciation (aka "Church Latin"). The
ae could be pronounced as
ai in aisle but only in reconstructed ancient Roman Latin. Both Encarta online and Merriam-Webster online give the pronunciation of
chaeta as kee-, not ki-.
Here and
here.
Another example: We pronounce algae as AL-jee, not AL-guy. Some English-speakers in other countries pronounce it as AL-ghee. We give it a soft g and they give it a hard g.
If anyone is interested,
this is a pretty good reference for the pronunciation of scientific Latin.
I took four years of Latin but that was more than 55 years ago and it was in a Catholic school, so it was based on a pronunciation that is closer to modern day Italian than what some people now say is the way Latin was pronounced in Cicero's time.
