<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12302696#post12302696 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by The Grim Reefer
Front
ATI Blue Plus
UVLSuper Actinic
UVL Aquasun
ATI Blue Plus
Hey Grim,
IMO, this is truly amazing... I am about to order my third set of bulbs, and I have relied heavily on your suggestions throughout this each purchase (and in the same thread to boot!). Crazy how time flies!
I have the Tek 4x54W fixture on my 72G bowfront.
Two years ago, you recommended (front to back), B+/AB/UVL SA/B+. I liked it. Last year, you recommended B+/UVL AS/UVL SA/B+ (I dont know if I asked directly... It was definitely better, though). This year I see that you are still recommending the same thing to some people, but I saw several pages ago that you were recommending some 75/25 bulb instead of the Aqua Sun. What difference is that going to make?
It looks like
[Front]
B+
UVL SuperActinic
UVL AquaSun
B+
[Back]
is what you are recommending for a normally driven 4x54W fixture now, though. Is this right?
It has been my observation that the UVL SA bulbs color/actinic properties deteriorate more quickly than the other bulbs. Has this been your observation?
Let me know what you think!
Thanks,
Gordon