LOL
However I've observed when anyone questions the "kure" stupidity very much, an irrational defense of an indefensibly dumb and embarassingly silly idea takes away from the positive themes in the thread.
I didn't realize that there was any real question about "kure" - until now. I have noticed that since I started the "cure" vs "kure", there seems to be less over all confusion, at least on this thread. Most folks at the time thought it was a good idea - better then using "cure" and "cure" in the same sentence when describing two completely different processes.
I've already said that I agree with Rhody, but it is sort of hard to get this hobby to accept change, and kure has caught on - my google search shows over 7000 returns for :
kure cement rock -"kure beach" (seems there is a beach names Kure, lol).
Many of these aren't about DIY rock, but many are...
But I certainly don't think that this terminology is going to cause people to not make rock, esp when they can ask one simple question on half a dozen different reef forums and get it straightened out.
Personally, if I could wave a magic wand and make the change, right now, I'd use "Neutralization Bath", but since most of the "big guns", like GARF and Tom Miller and others all use "cure" in their articles, I think it might cause even more confusion in the long run...
EDIT:
And only the term "cure" has been used for as long as I've been making rock (probably a lot longer then that).
I coined "kure" the summer before last, because there
was a lot of confusion. Someone would write "How long does it take to cure the rock?" How to answer them? Did they mean the hardening process "cure" (which has been in use in the cement industry, forever), or did they mean "cure", the baths required to bring the pH down? That came up a lot. Most folks where asking about the bath, but one couldn't just assume (two completely different answers for those questions) - you had to clarify. We don't have to clarify this hardly at all anymore....