The Ultimate DIY Rocks!

Hey there, Kronk - Welcome to the thread! :wavehand:
Drilling lots of holes in the PVC, something 1/2" or bigger, will allow the cement to stick a bit better.
Salt rock does not stick very well to anything, IME, and the more salt you add, the less well suited to building structures it will be and the more likely it will be to fail at some point down the road.
Using damp sand is the best way I've found to support stuff while it has a chance to setup. You might still have to work in stages, but the sand will allow you to get better, more natural "flow" with the rock.
Keep us posted and let us know what you end up with.

Hey Jeff :)
4200lbs - thats a serious pile of rock! :eek1: Would love to see pictures of that :D
 
So far I've made about 60 lbs. I think it looks pretty realistic-I just hope it doesn't end up crumbling. I did use some solar salt, but less than 1 part. Thanks to Insane Reefer for all her work with different recipes and documenting the results.

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/11329912@N07/2578322410/" title="DSC_0316 by jlischio, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3049/2578322410_93430d2bf2.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="DSC_0316" /></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/11329912@N07/2577489377/" title="DSC_0320 by jlischio, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3026/2577489377_49fe0ac07a.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="DSC_0320" /></a>

Jim
 
That looks really nice Jim, and Welcome to the Thread! :wave:

You did do a good job making realistic pieces, and with such a small amount of salt, your rock should be good to go. Most of the reports of crumbling rock that we've had have been of the straight "Salt Rock" recipes, so don't let it worry you :)

Be sure to post us some pictures of it once it is in-tank and has some life on it, ok?

Thanks for Posting!
 
VERY nice rocks. It seems important to have dry-ish mix and let it clump together on its own to get the porosity and lightness, correct?

PS InsaneReefer - actually, *you* rock, dear !
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12753111#post12753111 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by go200mph
What is the best thing to do to increase porosity?
This has worked for me -- after the fact.

I use an assortment of different size concrete drill bits and a half inch power drill to give a more natural look. I also sometimes use an old screwdriver and a hammer to chip off the face of the holes to naturalise them. Several large holes near each other can be merged with my "chipper" to create a cave. Don't over-pretty it. If the piece looks cool enough to her, my wife appropriates it and puts it in the garden with hens and chickens in the holes.
 
:o Thanks, Ocean Size, and Welcome to the Thread! You too, Go200mph :wavehand:

Rhodophyta's suggestion is a good one :) Scraping off the openings of tunnels to a bit of an angle certainly makes for a more realistic look.
Cement likes to form a bit of a surface "skin" that can be less porous, so chipping the surface opens the matrix for better water penetration and allows one to to refine a less than perfect piece. You can also remove the surface skin by spraying the rock with a mild acid solution, letting it sit for a few minutes and then rinsing it really well.

The rock I've been making with the Hydrated Lime and Calcium Chloride is really porous. Basically I add about 1/3 of a part of the Type "S" lime to the Ol' Skool recipe, and the lime seems to "de-densify" the cement to a point that water is immediately "wicked" into the rock; down side is that the more lime you add, the less strength you have. Dry Calcium Chloride should be used at a rate of no more than 2% by weight of the cement (include the lime in the total weight if you use it), which is why it is hard to give a good "measurement" of how much to use, since people are all using different size measures and cements all vary in terms of weight. Since cement is one of those things that isn't usually dealt with in weight, but in volume, things get confused in trying to convert - or I find it to be so anyway. The calcium chloride may increase actual cure time of the rock as well - it certainly speeds the initial set.
Perlite seems to really help as well, being so incredibly porous all on it's own.
And as Ocean Size says, the drier the cement mix, the more porous it becomes. Also, the less cement you use, the more porous the resulting rock should be; for regular "filtration" rock I end up with a ratio of around 1 part cement+lime to 4 parts aggregates, my aggregates being Calcium Carbonate sand, Crushed Oyster Shell and Perlite.

HTH,
IR :D
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12750230#post12750230 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by JimLish
So far I've made about 60 lbs. I think it looks pretty realistic-I just hope it doesn't end up crumbling. I did use some solar salt, but less than 1 part. Thanks to Insane Reefer for all her work with different recipes and documenting the results.

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/11329912@N07/2578322410/" title="DSC_0316 by jlischio, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3049/2578322410_93430d2bf2.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="DSC_0316" /></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/11329912@N07/2577489377/" title="DSC_0320 by jlischio, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3026/2577489377_49fe0ac07a.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="DSC_0320" /></a>

Jim

Can you post a detailed writeup with pics next time you make more?
How did you make it look so natural?
 
Nice job Jim those rocks look great!


I'm about 6 months into curing my rock and still nothing positive to report :( pH was over 10 yesterday.
 
Im in the same boat impur... not quite 6 months but close. every other day water changes with flow, heaters and water temps well over 90*
my test kit only goes to 8.8 though...not sure what the PH is but its not even close to the 8.8 color.
Im blaming the salt for the retarded kure on this batch. the next 2 batches are already kuring so we'll see how fast they go.
 
ok i just checked my dates... i was a bit off. i've only been kuring for 3 months it just seems longer.
started kure on 3/10 and still off the charts.
 
nah, its just a waiting game im sure. this is still a relatively new process so the bugs are getting worked out. IR has her S#!t together here, so its just a matter of time before perfection.
nothing for cheap comes easily or works as well as expected.
 
I've been lazy with WCs is why mine is taking so long. Just started being diligent about a month ago.

Actually now that i think about it, that might not be it. I've got a rock in my toilet tank that i made without salt and its been in there for 6m. pH still thru the roof. Maybe i did something wrong? I donno. Not much to screw up - cement, sand, and some rock rubble is all it is.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12757164#post12757164 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kinghokus420
...this is still a relatively new process so the bugs are getting worked out.

Um, actually, the basic techniques we use are at least 30 years old; the salt is new, and some of the materials are "new", and certainly the Jiffy Rock and Steaming are new as is the idea's I've had on carbonation vs kure, but most of you are still making the Ol' Skool rock, which is, well, Old ;)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12757123#post12757123 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by OCEAN SIZE
Would pH buffers speed up the process ?

No, unfortunately. You can't add it to the cement or the cement just doesn't do what it is supposed to do, and added to the water simply buffers the water the rock is in, not make any chemical changes in the rock.
:(
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12758167#post12758167 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Insane Reefer
the salt is new, and some of the materials are "new", and certainly the Jiffy Rock and Steaming are new as is the idea's I've had on carbonation vs kure,

thats the part i was referring to.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12757996#post12757996 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by impur
Not much to screw up - cement, sand, and some rock rubble is all it is.

Actually, there are quite a few things that can be "screwed up".
And since no two cements lots are identical (even from the same plant) chemically speaking, it becomes hard to pinpoint where something went wrong.

An improper cure can produce rock that will leech high pH for a very long time. What is improper? Allowing the rock to dry out before the cure completes is probably the one most people will be guilty of. Rock should be kept moist for at least two weeks, and preferably for a month to ensure that all the cement gets a chance to hydrate. If it doesn't all completely hydrate, then you will have problems as now not only do you have to leech out the Ca(OH)2 (calcium hydroxide) as well as all the unhydrated materials. Simply sealing them in plastic bags or a plastic tote should do the trick, maybe mist them once a week or so to keep the humidity high.

Using too high of a ratio of cement makes a dense cement that is very hard to kure. Water will move through even the densest cement (but not fast set cements, which are considered impermeable by the cement experts), but it might be at a snails pace, only a few millimeters a day, if that. At that rate it will take a very long time indeed to kure out.

Salt itself retards the cure of cement. Cement must cure before it can really start to be kured - otherwise you are simply wasting water and effort. Under normal situations, cement is said to cure in 28 days, but adding sodium chloride has a slowing effect on this process, so it is likely that the actual cure is taking a lot longer than the normal 28 days.

Curing is an ongoing process in the rock - while the cement industry has settled on the "28 day" rule for a testing standard, the chemical reactions going on in the cement can keep going on for decades, and a lot of things can affect this. Humidity and temperature are big one's. For best results, cement should be made in humidity of 50% or higher and in a temp of 65°F or higher. Lower these parameters and you prolong the length of the cure, though going higher than these can have a speeding effect, at least for our purposes.

Larger rocks, esp those with a lot of salt (more than 2 parts of salt), and rock with no aggregates other than salt, can take a coons age to kure as the salt must release before enough water flow can get in to carry the Ca(OH)2 out of the rock. So you can think of it as a two-fold process - one to remove the salt and one to remove the Ca(OH)2, which really, can make it take twice as long to kure.

Making too wet of a cement mix also slows down the kure and actually weakens the cement. Trying to describe the perfect amount of water has stumped us all forever. In the cement industry, they use something called "slump" to determine is there is enough, or too much water in a mix. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concrete_Slump_Test
One can sort of adapt this for home use by using either a plastic cup or funnel, filling it up and carefully releasing it. For our purposes, there should be no slump at all.

Packing the rock when you cast it will also make denser rock; when you are casting, try to "drool" the mud into place, in marble sized drops, this will allow natural channels to form in the rock, allowing more water flow and thus allowing it to kure faster; without water flow, little kuring can happen. Using this technique, with suitably "dry" mud will allow water to flow though even non-porous cements like fast set cements or densified cements.

And then there is the question of when to start the kure. Cement is hydraulic, meaning it will cure underwater. I know from my research that cement cured in water is typically "better" than like cement that cures normally. However I've not been able to find anything that indicates if this will speed or slow the chemical reactions happening in the rock. So I can only speak from observation, mine own and from those of you who post your experiences. What I've gleaned so far says that if you chuck your rock into water too soon, the reaction seems to drastically slow. What is too soon? From what I can tell, anything sooner than two weeks seems to be detrimental to the kure.

When you get to the kure, well, I've had the best luck with adding a air pump and stone as well as power head and heat to the water. I seem to get quicker results when I use all three. Of course this ups the utility bills, but it does seem to help.

Plenty of water volume for the rock is also necessary. Filling up a tote or bucket with rock and topping it off with water just doesn't cut it as you only end up with a few gallons of water. I try to use the same approach we use to calculate how much rock we need in our setups 1lbs to 1gallon and it seems to work well.

And I had such good luck last fall with the daily watering of my rock that I am trying to figure out a "waterfall" idea for kuring (plus then maybe I can justify that water feature I've always wanted, lol). I think that if water is allowed to actually fall through the rock, over and over, without the rock being submerged, the rock will kure faster. I'm planning on trying this on a small scale this summer to see if there is any possibility to it, and if it is, then I might solicit help on devising something that could handle a good sized pile of rock.

I hope this might help - if your having trouble kuring your rock, and you are "guilty" of one or more of these points, then you probably have your answer and can change your approach the next time you cast with hopefully better results...
 
Last edited:
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12758759#post12758759 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kinghokus420
thats the part i was referring to.

Well, the salt you'd need to talk to Travis about - that was his baby, and I'm not sure what more can be done to lessen the impact of using salt, which is why I suggest that if people really want the extra voids, use the Ol' Skool + recipe. Travis himself has some of his salt rock in the process of deteriorating and so I think salt should be used very sparingly, if at all...

And carbonation will take quite a while to test, let alone devise a method that works for most people; and that is if it even does pan out. I really think it is the way to go, but without a real lab and people to work in the lab, it will be a slow process of trial and error...

I'm working on it as fast as I can :)
 
Back
Top