wet vs dry skimming

Large bubbles that are produced during dry skimming, at the top of the neck, do not have the surface tension to suspend large particulate matter. If the level you set in your skimmer is say hypothetically 4" below the riser cup to produce dry skimmate, the weight of the particulate matter that reaches the top will eventually not be able to support the types of bubbles produced during dry skimming. Sadly, I have spent many hours watching my skimmer and the types of bubbles that spill over the neck during wet skimming and dry skimming are vastly different.

During dry skimming it is a compounding effect that occurs on a molecular level. The bubbles that pop release organic material that is able to be suspended by the surface tension of the bubbles below it. Therefore, as the bubbles release more and more organic matter it builds until it can spill over. While this is not a bad thing it does require a breakdown of some sort which is usually accomplished in the tank in the form of an organic breakdown. As long as your skimmer is big enough it will be able to take it out by this method eventually, and probably before it causes any kind of harm to your tank. The only problem I have observed with dry skimming is that the bubbles pop in the neck and stick to the riser which requires frequent maintenance. The stuff that sticks to the neck is pure sludge and the stench is unbearable. I would say that this is definately accomplishing something, along with the dark stank that is in my collection cup.

With wet skimming the bubbles rise to a high enough level then spill over, hopefully not too quickly where you are pulling out a solution low in organics. The one good thing about the bubbles that are allowed to reach the top of the riser is that they have the ability to suspend particulate matter until it can reach the top of the collection cup. This is due to the increased surface tension that is a result of water/bubbles that is low in organic molecules that can impede the natural ionic bond that are created by the properties of water's ionic nature. Look at pure water and watch the meniscus effect, now try changing the chemistry of the water (with organics and not electrolytes) and see if the meniscus effect is nearly as strong. When I skim wet there are a lot of particles in the cup that would end up in my tank to eventually break down. Yes, I skim wet because of this. I would rather it break down in my cup than in my tank.

My last comment is refuting possible arguments to statements I have made previously. Salt will actually increase the surface tension of water by introducing charge into the water by releasing + and - ions into the water which will actually attract the molecules more than in pure water. This is why our skimmers work effectively in salt water but not in fresh water. If you have ever run your skimmer in a rubbermaid in freshwater you know what I mean.
SurfTen1.jpg

Here is a graph to illustrate my point.
Here is a decent link
http://www.ucalgary.ca/~schramm/explan.htm
 
Last edited:
Another thing, water in it's purest state is a very volatile solvent. It is full of free radicals that can actually eat away at at stainless steel piping without a proper coating. I worked in designing a pharmaceutical plant at one point at time and it required that we we used stainless piping with highly specialized coatings on the interior of the pipe. Not only that but each weld that were used to join the pipes were inspected to ensure that there were no voids in the pipe that could eventually corrode. This was pharmaceutical grade water which went through triple distillation, and so many other steps that I forget the entire process since it was about 8 years ago that I worked on this project. The point is that pure water can be considered a solvent which should be the baseline for comparison. Obviously salt is an electrolyte to illustrate all points discussed.
 
all someone needs to do is collect wet for a while....and then collect skimate dry for the same amount of time as wet. And if nothing else changes then all you need to do is evaporate it and weigh the results. See what has more mass. Obvioulsy this would not be a perfect exparment because the wet may have more salt because of the extra water. But I think it would give us a good idea. Who knows maybe it will suprise us.
 
I don't think weight is a valid comparison unless you dehydrate the liquid in the cup. The problem is that with wet skimming you will have more salts left behind which will skew the results, as you stated.

I think the best way is to get somebody that is involved in civil engineering/waste water treatment engineering to tell us how they can effectively measure the amount of dissolved organic compounds in the water being measured. Not only that but the particulate matter in the wet skimming cup has to be allowed to break down to an acceptable level to be compared.

My ex-girlfriend is an environmental engineer and I can ask her if she has any equipment that can effectively measure DOC's.
 
I did a water change buy doing a wet skim. Picture this...white 5 gallon bucket filled with greenish/yellow water. Do you want that in your tank? Sure it took a hour, but this will prove the point. Try it.

Now think about when you do a water change.
When you siphon water out your tank to do a water change...what color is it? Is it yellow-green or the same color as your water in your tank?

Now ask yourselves...which one has more dissolved organics?:

A) Nasty Yellow-green water
B) Just siphoning it out of the tank



I think it is obvious what has more dissolved organics in it, therefore, apply this same principle to regular skimming.

How long would it have taken me to pull out the same amount of organics as when I did the water change by using the dry foam method. What pulls out more dissolved organics faster, wet or dry.

Answers:
A) Nasty yellow-green water
Gee, thats right! Wet skimming is faster at taking dissolved organics out. Therefore, lowers dissolved organics in a reef tank!


Duh.
 
Last edited:
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6980646#post6980646 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by abark
I don't think weight is a valid comparison unless you dehydrate the liquid in the cup.

did I not say that? if not I ment to
 
PatrickJ - when you are wet skimming, you are pulling out a diluted solution of skimmate and water which is giving you the yellow green water. If you dry skim, you are less diluted which gives you a brownish/black colored skimmate. So answer me this, which has more disolved organics?
A) Nasty yellow green water
B) Really nasty brownish black water

Answers:
B) Really nasty brownish black water

Gee, thats right! Dry skimming might be slower but is pulling more disolved organics out per cup of skimmate than wet skimming. What I am getting at is this:

You are comparing wet skimmate to tank water. One diluted solution of organics to one highly diluted solution of tank water and organics. How can you compare tank water coloring to skimmate? Following your comparisons, dry skimming is better due to the coloration of the skimmate collected.

abark - I think that you and jent46bow are correct in measuring the total disolved organics in wet and dry skimmate to determine which is the better method. Let me know if you are able to get the equipment or to find a relatively easy way to measure the DOC's. If you can't, I will search around on Monday during work since I deal with civil engineers on a daily basis.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6980902#post6980902 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jent46bow
did I not say that? if not I ment to

you said exactly that and it is my bad for misquoting you. I think I went off on a tangent because you were saying it is a matter of time versus molecular adsorbtion. My bad, and I sincerely apologize, I really did not mean to misquote you. I hope you understand. If you look at my post count you can realize that I tend to shy away from these types of internet discussions because they can get out of hand very quickly.
 
abark - I think that you and jent46bow are correct in measuring the total disolved organics in wet and dry skimmate to determine which is the better method. Let me know if you are able to get the equipment or to find a relatively easy way to measure the DOC's. If you can't, I will search around on Monday during work since I deal with civil engineers on a daily basis. [/B][/QUOTE]

If you can get the equipment to make the ultimate solution a reality please do. I think this is ultimately a BB vs. SB discussion because what we are really discussing is getting the organics out before they can dissolve. I run a SSB so I am in between. If we can actually get equipment to run our DOC experiment then I think we have something to stand on. Problem is I am not entirely sure if there is equipment that will give us what we are looking for. If there is anybody I know ithat would have the answers t is my ex as she has a masters in environmental engineering and she deals with this daily. She has brought great equipment home that I wanted to use but I did not due to the toxins she used to work with on her old work sites.
 
ckfazz,

Friend, you are not following me. Your not getting the point that I am hitting.

By really wet skimming, I was able to pull out the stuff that would take a week for your skimmer to take out dry. I did this in a hour.

Its like taking the wet foam you made, pour it into clear salt water, creating the same color as what I made by wet skimming.
 
what about this (may get us closer). It would not require any high tech equitment and it may give us an idea of what is going on.

1) I create a very dry skimate for 5 days....
2) I then create a very wet skimate for 5 days....
3) measure the quantity of volume for the dry and the wet....
4) create a salt mixture of the quantity of the wet minus the quantity of the dry....
5) dehydrate all three solutions (the plain salt mixture, dry skimate, and wet).
6) weigh all three mixtures.
7) Subtract the weight from the plain salt mixture from the wet solution.
8) post results :-)

btw abark no worries, just wanted to make sure that was clear :-)
 
the meniscus effect is exactly how I would describe the head at the top of my riser right now.

Here it is 20 something hours later with only 1/4 of a cube fed. Can someone tell me where the rest of this stuff is comming from?? (I hope these pictures have people adjusting their skimmers)

day16au.jpg


dsc0311010kd.jpg



Can someone who skims dry, post a picture of your collection cup 24 hours after cleaning your entire skimmer inside and out with dish soap?
 
Last edited:
i could swear i am pulling more gunk out of my little berlin, i empty mine every day its just a little cup maybe hold 6 cups of nasty, but its real dark and thick not clear like yours is...real nasty chunks and stuff...i could be wrong, but from the looks of how much nassty you have in the bottom of that bucket compared to the nasty in my 6 cup , i would have to swear my 6 cup has alot more nasty in it...
 
is my skimmer doing its job, i dunno, but you can see after 8 hours, from the bottom of the collection cup the first 2 inches of breakdown, and then you can see the green water above that, then you can see the foam to which where the stuff in the bottom is coming from, now theres another collection cup on top to add carbon for smell, but i didnt i am using it to collection foam also, except the finer foam goes up top then breaks down into nastyier green sludge wich falls down to lower collection cup, now is this running good, dont mind the rubber band, the top collection cup pops off without it holding it down...now i dump this everyday so to me i am pulling out more running the dry skimming
 
forgot pic~~~
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e19/spoonyluvr25b/camera.jpg" border="0" alt="Image hosting by Photobucket"></a>
 
All I need to see is that my tank has fewer particles floating around when I skim wet and my sump stays cleaner. The difference is aprant after only a few days. I've skimmed super dry and super wet, and everywhere in between. I'll skim wet, thank you very much.
 
Spoon you also have to realize that my tank, rocks, and water are already real clean. My skimmer pulls this stuff out of thin air.

I'm waiting to find someone to play the "take detailed shots of the inside of your glass everyday for 2 weeks" game with me.
 
yeah i was thinking that, so my tank must be real dirty then? are there ways you can tell....and personally i still think my tank is still slightly cycling, even after 4 months...does this affect the skimming process?
 
Back
Top