What is with people?

[Cody Ray]

And I thought the picture of a carpet anemone in a nanocube was bad

How irresponsible can you get? It's like advertising a 1'x1' crib with 3 babies crammed in!

 

[AAA88]

there is no way that is real

 

[Blown 346]

I believe ads like that or similar just take fish and insert them in their tanks tyo make them more appealing to the consumer. Think about, you see a beautiful tank with beatiful fish and you want that tank and those fish. It is just a selling point. I dont think they woud cram that many fish into a tank that size, having it un cycled just for a picture. Photoshop does wonders.

 

[Cody Ray]

I completely understand the photoshopping, but IMO it still encorages poor reefkeeping. I think that if thoughs fish would be happy in such a small aquarium, it would be a beautiful setup too.

 

[ERICinFL]

You know some jacka$$ with no experience in reef keeping would try that exact set up. I agree with the photoshop angle, that plant in the back ground looks like one I've had in my freshwater aquarium.

 

[scubasteve247]

its not, its a print out, like a tank background pressed up against the glass, its that simple.

 

[keckles]

Everyone knows you can keep three tangs in that size of tank as long as they are all of a different genus. What is the problem?

 

[doody]

When I was getting my cousin started in the hobby, he seen something similar at an LFS. He called me asking how many triggers he could keep in his 5g minibow.

 

[hot4teacher]

And with the Internet, you know there is some joker ordering just that for his 6g nano-cube. We just don't see it.

 

[MAreefer1]

PHOTOSHOP IS A VERY AMAZING PROGRAM!


I use it all the time myself

 

[MAreefer1]

OH NO...Look at this ad tank!!!
SOMEONE PUT A RARE YELLOW MICHAEL JACKSON FISH IN IT... THEY NEED ATLEAST 500 GALLONS AND EAT LIVE CHILDREN!!!


<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img304.imageshack.us/img304/9640/fisg9bk.jpg" border="0" width="350" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" /></a>

 

[Drew Reed]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[MAreefer1]

lol...yeop, that fish is 800 bukks

 

[atreis]

You all seem to be assuming the tank is round. Maybe it's just rounded on the end, narrow, and is actually 15 feet deep.

 

[rbp 4 135]

no it is actually round, cause a lfs by me has them, i was looking at them thinking that it would make a cool nano the other day.

 

[dr.darkness]

Even though it is photoshop and is done for advertising only reasones I agree with chinchek and it souldn't be done. These companies need to be educated because there are people who will do exactly that.

 

[cwegescheide]

SOMEONE PUT A RARE YELLOW MICHAEL JACKSON FISH IN IT... THEY NEED ATLEAST 500 GALLONS AND EAT LIVE CHILDREN!!!

Ummmmmm..... I don't think thats all the Michael Jackson fish does with children... If I were you I would refer to the "whats the most in-humane way to kill a Michael Jackson fish" thread...

 

[keckles]

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6424678#post6424678 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by rbp 4 135
no it is actually round.

So, technically it is infinitely long, having no true end. Which means it is larger than the largest rectangular tank available. Therefore, it is completely acceptable to house several large tangs in it.

 

[donta42]

michael jackson tang . lol