skimmer or no skimmer, one can have a successful reef. however, to suggested that a skimmer is like adding tetracycline to your reef is idiotic!!!
nevertheless, a "dry zone" is a million dollar idea!!!:blown:
we all have our opinions. this is my old 220. same setup.
gfo, chiller, refugium chambers,ats
im enjoying the laughs though
if you think im the 1 in a million just check youtube. most of us did that carbon dosing, skimmer, etc and we all wind up in the same place. or just check these photos in this forum.
Yup I'm with you on that point.
youngins need some teaching up
I am a chemical engineer, so i understand what a skimmer is and isn't doing. I know it's not removing nitrates, it's removing things before they can break down into nitrates. I also understand that they remove photo and other microorganisms, as I designed a froth flotation column that would be used for concentrating algae to made into biodiesel. I always figured the benefits out weighed the costs.
I wouldn't be opposed to trying a large skimmerless approach and comparing it to my current system. No way I would try it on my established sps system without seeing consistent proof and probably trying it myself on a different system
yeah if you already are skimmered. you got a 3 month lag before it naturalizes. least it took that long in my 220 when i stopped with the nonsense.
better you do what you do. if it works, great. to me, its a placebo for newbs.
Last edited:
