Which is easier lps or sps?

Status
Not open for further replies.

mjc041800

New member
and which lighting should I have for lps in a tank with also softies? my tank is 30" long and 19" height. I am on a tight budget. I am keeping some of the easier corals thank you
 
I think what's harder is mixing them. Like a bare bottom sps tank with no fish can be pretty low maintenance, and a fish tank with softies isn't that big of a deal. I don't think I would call any of it "easy" though, cause like Heath said you have to learn about what you want to keep.

Same with the lights, are you asking which bulb type will work, or for a recommendation on a brand and model you should buy?

The best way to save money is read and read and read some more. The stickies on "setting up" at the top of this page are a good place to start.
 
This must be a trick question... They're both easy if you give them what they require.

Well said! I think sps are the easiest.
Just cheap on line leds will be cool for the softies of cool white and standard blue diode with 80 degree optics and a 100watt fitting.
 
SPS is more expensive.....generally they require cleaner water, higher flow and more intense lighting or you could translate that as a better skimmer, more pumps and higher end LEDs/ higher power T5.
 
My bottom tank with a $98 led light and no skimmer and no water changes for near 2 years, it was lots of work but sps is very easy.
bottom%20tank%20before%20oswald_zpstxycvj3d.jpg
 
SPS are hard just because of rtn imo.

I haven't had a LPS just randomly up and die on me, I have had a large SPS colony growing out for 2 years then just over the course of a few days completely die.
 
SPS remains the bleeding edge of the hobby: failures are frequent. LPS is a little more stable, and some grows quite readily, while softies have gotten to be pretty aggressive growers with our equipment.
 
In my case, I decided to go LPS and I have 4-5 Montis which I can are most forgiven of the SPS group. My nirates range from 5-10ppm and the Montis are doing good.
 
LPS tend to be a little more forgiving (although there are some LPS that are more difficult than the easier SPS corals).
 
My bottom tank with a $98 led light and no skimmer and no water changes for near 2 years, it was lots of work but sps is very easy.
bottom%20tank%20before%20oswald_zpstxycvj3d.jpg

Beautiful, natural looking overgrown tank!
Looks like you don't have any fish? I'd also like to know what brand of light you have, looking for one.

Ivy
 
Definitely the exception to the rule here!! When you say lots of work what do you mean?

skimmer is a placebo.

+1 no waterchanges. no skimmer. sps mixed reef.

i do need my chiller though. very critical for me.


SPS are hard just because of rtn imo.

I haven't had a LPS just randomly up and die on me, I have had a large SPS colony growing out for 2 years then just over the course of a few days completely die.



stop jacking up your alk above 7.5-8 then
 
How many fish do you have in there and how often/what do you feed them?

cbb, yt, regal tang, watchman goby, 2 mandarin dragonettes, melanarus wrasse

twice daily. cube of mysis. lunch on weekends get a pinch of algae pellets, and a cube of cyclops, acropower 20ml, oyster feast 20ml, nutricell (buncha scoops)

point is if you monitor your weekly nitrates and pull the skimmer, chances are they wont change. all you are doing is pulling the lowest rank of the foodchain out and letting it die in a cup

if you are overstocked to hell... may be a bit of a difference
 
Last edited:
My bottom tank with a $98 led light and no skimmer and no water changes for near 2 years, it was lots of work but sps is very easy.
bottom%20tank%20before%20oswald_zpstxycvj3d.jpg

You forget to mention you live on the beach just beyond barrier reef and your sump is the ocean..


Gorgeous tank .
 
If a skimmer is a placebo, then what's all this brown gunk I have to pull out of it every few days? just fish poo?
 
If a skimmer is a placebo, then what's all this brown gunk I have to pull out of it every few days? just fish poo?

It probably breaks down along these lines:
C: 21.08 %
H: 2.39 %
N: 2.22 %
Ca:17.43 %
Mg: 1.35 %
Si: 4.76 %
P: 0.16 % ("Assuming that all of the P is present as phosphate ... This amount equals ~ 4900 ppm")

This test dried the skimmate for measure, and could not see the inorganic phos that gfo takes out. But it's an interesting study http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/2/aafeature
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top