Amphiprion
Premium Member
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8450810#post8450810 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by PrangeWay
This is actually a very very common misperception and tends to be wildly inaccurate over time. It may hold relatively true if your tank is a few months old, but as your tank gets older they drop constantly..
Ex:
You're Element X is 1 ppm. It is very slowly used and at your 15% waterchange at 2 weeks it's at 0.95 ppm. You change 20% with a new salt mix at 1 ppm and it is now at 0.96 ppm. At the end of the month it is at 0.91 ppm and you do another 20% water change so it's pushs up slightly to 0.93 ppm. So you've lost 0.07 ppm or 7% even with your water changes. Now even using up 1% you'll lose um .8% a month or almost 10% over a year.
Anything that is being "used" in your tank will deplete over time even with water changes, because it's only returning it to a set level, not making up what has been used. Now I don't advocate dosing everything, we don't know what 9/10ths of it does and if we need it, or how to measure it. But do realize that as your tank gets older it's deficent in ALOT of trace elements, and nothing outside of 100% wc will fix that... It's something to think about...
PW
Very true and it does make you think. However, it is considering only water changes as the sole outside source of certain elements. In reality, we know that a good bit comes from foods and additives (sometimes incidental in the latter, otherwise purposeful). Without even those small 15% changes, those levels could potentially build up, despite depletion by other mechanisms. Unfortunately, this is all difficult, if not impossible to quantify, as you mentioned, due to the fact that we have no clue what may use some of this stuff and to what extent they use it. The safest bet, which is implied by your statement, is to approximate seawater as best as possible (whether we know what uses what or not).