Are you sure that these figures are correct?I'm willing to share the main metals which are iron maganese zinc and copper thses level are on
Iron 0.34 ppm
Maganess 0.98 ppm
Zinc 0.45 ppm
Copper 0.35ppm
We make up a solution with 1lt
Mn is 245mg
Zinc is 89mg
Copper is 67mg
Iron 2grams
Then we dos 40ml x 2 per 11000lts
We are not wanting to keep it at NSWFrom what I gather the palintest9100 is just an entry level deuterium-tungsten UV-Vis spectrophotometer. So by itself it can't really measure any metal concentration, at least not at the low levels we are talking abiut. They would need colorimetric reagents to measure anything. So it's accuracy would depend more on the accuracy of the reagents and experimenter, in addition to the intrinsic accuracy of the spec. Unless I'm missing something.
It is very strange, I have approximately the same dosage Mn,Zn,Fe, but the level is kept 1000 times less.Yes I am sure in a closed system the trace elements need to be a lot higher
I will post up all my results of the trace metals test
I will only put up zinc iron maganese and copper
Sustainable Reefs Cairns Australia.
https://m.facebook.com/sustainablereef
At the moment we are doing a paper on trace metals should be finished in February with Southern Cross University the paper contents will be trace element uptake growth and colour.
What i have notice is when different trace metals are added Alk and Calcium would drop
Alk would drop from 135ppm to 115ppm over a 12 hours and calcium would also but only 30 to 40ppm per day in saying this we have about 6000 frags in each system which is 11000 lts each all under natural sunlight
I'm willing to share the main metals which are iron maganese zinc and copper thses level are on
Iron 0.34 ppm
Maganess 0.98 ppm
Zinc 0.45 ppm
Copper 0.35ppm
We make up a solution with 1lt
Mn is 245mg
Zinc is 89mg
Copper is 67mg
Iron 2grams
Then we dos 40ml x 2 per 11000lts
I can post up photos of photos tomorrow of growth or look on our facebook site or have a read of the fram forum
Cheers chris
Sustainable Reefs Cairns Australia.
https://m.facebook.com/sustainablereef
I agree there's also more then enough to show Fe and Cu are important too.
Absolutely. But I don't add those. I found that limited Fe doesn't seem to affect tissue growth the way that Zn, Mn, and Cu can. I dose Mn as well but have been cautious of adding Cu due to the bad rap it has always had. I do know a few people who have recently started adding Cu and they have not had problems so I may start to play with it in 6 months or so.
I thing the papers you mentioned , wrote for the importance of fe/Zn and fe/Cu. Why do you focus just on Zn and mn , and not their analogy with fe?Absolutely. But I don't add those. I found that limited Fe doesn't seem to affect tissue growth the way that Zn, Mn, and Cu can. I dose Mn as well but have been cautious of adding Cu due to the bad rap it has always had. I do know a few people who have recently started adding Cu and they have not had problems so I may start to play with it in 6 months or so.
We have played with Fe and Mn in higher levels works well for growth not so much colourBecause strong biomass growth happened with even the lowest amounts of Fe in their tests. But not so with low Cu and Zn. Deficiencies of either Cu or Zn resulted in poor growth for S. kawagutii in the study. Also found was with low Zn/Cu was elevated Mn and Fe quotas.
So for me, I took that to mean keep Zn and Mn in the water column for absorption and you are setting up the right conditions for good growth.
Thanks for the input. I'm very interested in reading the results but honestly highly skeptical of the methods and accuracy.
smhhighly skeptical? I think our results speak for themselves....