270 Gallon SPS tank for JBNY
- Thread starter JB NY
- Start date
Lunchbucket
Premium Member
JB NY - can't believe you have a thread started!! that means we are one day closer to your new tank. your old tank got so many of us into SPS or reefs i can't wait to see what the new tank (whatever size it will be) will bring
keep us updated and post lots of pics!
Lunchbucket
keep us updated and post lots of pics!
Lunchbucket
Joe, my tank is almost exactly like yours 72x30x24 three sided starfire and Eurobracing, but with the overflow in the middle. The overflow box is very small and doesn't take up much room, but at the same time, doesn't give you much room to work with inside. You really don't notice it much if you put reefceramics or rock on the back.
I love the size of the tank and can't wait to see how it turns out.
He is a link to my build if your interested,
My new tank is in (the garage)
Pierce, a new tank?? How does Cindy put up with it!
I love the size of the tank and can't wait to see how it turns out.
He is a link to my build if your interested,
My new tank is in (the garage)
Pierce, a new tank?? How does Cindy put up with it!
kelhuffman
Premium Member
Joe, my miracles 72x36x25 starphire tank was just set up this week with the overflow on one side. its an external though but relatively small. the overflow grate is only 11 inches long. I turned on the circulation last night (Running iwaki 50) with sump room below tank and about 10 feet away. big concern was too much flow for my overflow grate size but its worked out perfectly. the biggest gamble I'm taking is running all circulation from that same external box using tunzes. nothing on the other side for aesthetic reasons. We'll see if it works out. Pics taken of my construction so far but not posted yet. Definitely still a work in progress.
JB NY
Active member
Hmm maybe I'll have to stop by your house and look at your setup again. I really don't want to put 2 overflows in the tank. In my head I've been coming up with some cool aquascaping ideas and coral placement that would work so much better with only one overflow in the corner. Also the flow I have worked out seems to be better suited to one overflow.
Here is what I am currently thinking of doing with flow and the placement of returns and powerhead.
The top and the bottom left powerheads would be 1" rotating Wavy Seas. The other two powerheads on the right would be Tunze streams.
Yeah, I'm a little concerned about not being able to get to the overflow if it is in the middle. With the old tank there were many times, over the years, that a fish or something had gone into the overflow. With the tank on against the wall and the overflow in the middle and 3 feet of tank in between, I'm not sure I would be able to get to the inside of the overflow if needed. Having on the side just makes it more accessible.
JB NY
Active member
Thanks for the feedback. I've given up hope of not using powerheads in the tank. With the last tank, I was constantly moving or adding powerheads to cope with the corals growing in different directions and cutting off flow to other sides. It seems that no matter what I would do a coral would think it's a great idea to grow right up and towards the flow, effectively blocking all the corals behind it. So for my own sanity I think I am better off just planning on the same thing happening rather than going with a static flow pattern that is not easy to modify.
jjjimmy
Premium Member
JBNY, the biggest problem that I can see with the corner overflow is that it would really distract from the viewing on that side where a center overflow would give you better 3 sided viewing. You could always put some screen over the top of the overflow to keep fish out.
I am curious why you are considering using powerheads and/or streams when you are starting from scratch with a new tank. I for one when looking at a tank want to see the beauty of the livestock and not the mechanics (i.e. powerheads) keeping it running. Why not just go with a closed loop right from the beginning, that way all of the equipment will be incognito (sp?).
Also, I just re-plumbed some of my 180 and decided to go with the Sequence Manta Ray pump. It is an absolutely kick butt pump and runs everything that I have with pressure to spare. Just a thought.
I like every one else am looking forward to seeing the progress to another TOTM.
Jimmy
I am curious why you are considering using powerheads and/or streams when you are starting from scratch with a new tank. I for one when looking at a tank want to see the beauty of the livestock and not the mechanics (i.e. powerheads) keeping it running. Why not just go with a closed loop right from the beginning, that way all of the equipment will be incognito (sp?).
Also, I just re-plumbed some of my 180 and decided to go with the Sequence Manta Ray pump. It is an absolutely kick butt pump and runs everything that I have with pressure to spare. Just a thought.
I like every one else am looking forward to seeing the progress to another TOTM.
Jimmy
JB NY
Active member
JBNY, the biggest problem that I can see with the corner overflow is that it would really distract from the viewing on that side where a center overflow would give you better 3 sided viewing. You could always put some screen over the top of the overflow to keep fish out.
If you look at the picture from the last page you will see that the tank will sit between two shelving units. They come out about 12" from the wall, so having the overflow about 9" out into the tank shouldn't really be noticeable from the side. (I'm hoping
)I am curious why you are considering using powerheads and/or streams when you are starting from scratch with a new tank. I for one when looking at a tank want to see the beauty of the livestock and not the mechanics (i.e. powerheads) keeping it running. Why not just go with a closed loop right from the beginning, that way all of the equipment will be incognito (sp?).
Well for flow. I can get more flow for less wattage using streams rather than a closed loop. Also with the closed loop, I am stuck with were the returns are. In my last tank, I had to move powerheads more than a few times to make corrections in the flow because of coral growth. Also, in the old tank, the sea swirl on my left side of the tank had a millepora grow right next to it, completely cutting off the flow to everything on the right side of the tank. So by just not putting a closed loop in I am trying to leave myself the flexibility of being able to move my sources of flow to different areas of the tank when the time comes.
The pic below is the situation I am writing about. The Green millepora started off as a 1" frag that was about 8" below the surface. Eventually it grew to fill the space you see plus about 3-4" more. When I took out the coral the main section it was growing from was almost 4" thick!! That coral had been fraged many times, in more than a few cases I fraged pretty big sections of 6" or more.
Here is the same section less than a year later. You can not even see the sea swirl anymore as the corals have grown right around it. I ended up putting a small powerhead in the back to get more flow to some of the other corals that were starting to recede do to lack of flow at this point.
So my thoughts are that if I go with a configuration that hides all my plumbing I will have to rip it out later due to growth.
Also, I just re-plumbed some of my 180 and decided to go with the Sequence Manta Ray pump. It is an absolutely kick butt pump and runs everything that I have with pressure to spare. Just a thought.
I've had a Sequence 6000 for the last 4 years. Over 3000GPH at 20' HP it's a great pump. I use it to run my return as well as my skimmer and chiller. You'll be happy with that pump for a long time.
steve68
New member
Joe i say go with the corner overflow, like u said u are not really going to see it do 2 the shelf on the side, & i know u will have plenty of water movement in there, i put a corner overflow on my 125 (6 feet long) & water flows great, u have to work with the room u have, cant wait to see the tank go up.
REEF-DADDY
New member
I have a 280 72"x36"x25" with end overflows, mine are huge but I was able to blend them in well. I can post pics if you would like to see. The end overflows do really hamstring the wavebox to a very great extent, I'd say almost cuts its effectiveness in half.
dgasmd
New member
JB NY:
I knew you'd be back before too long. Too hardcore to just quit altogether. Although I am sure that the no tank time brought some needed rest and lack of preocupation.
Seems to me you are dead set on having an overflow. As others have mentioned, the external overflow is a great option, but one that seems not practical for your particular tank's location. I hate overflow boxes myself, so I would go way out of my way not to have one. Another solution is to have 2 drains on the back walls of the tank, one toward each top corner. They become practically invisible when coated with coralline or painted black. Here is a picture to illustrate them. You can still use an external modified durso to quiet them just like a regular durso pipe. If you make them in 2" bulkheads, you can use a 2"x3" piece of PVC and put it upside down like I did with mine making a sort of funnel. They are completely maintenance free unlike overflow boxes, and are great at skimming the surface despite the looks of them not leading you to believe that.
By the way, about the Tunze waveboxes. I very very highly suggest you see some tanks with these on working properly before spending the money on them. I was kind of suspect of their advertised ability. I saw a couple working on some tanks and was sorely disappointed by their poor performance. I guess they were far from what I expected of them.
I knew you'd be back before too long. Too hardcore to just quit altogether. Although I am sure that the no tank time brought some needed rest and lack of preocupation.
Seems to me you are dead set on having an overflow. As others have mentioned, the external overflow is a great option, but one that seems not practical for your particular tank's location. I hate overflow boxes myself, so I would go way out of my way not to have one. Another solution is to have 2 drains on the back walls of the tank, one toward each top corner. They become practically invisible when coated with coralline or painted black. Here is a picture to illustrate them. You can still use an external modified durso to quiet them just like a regular durso pipe. If you make them in 2" bulkheads, you can use a 2"x3" piece of PVC and put it upside down like I did with mine making a sort of funnel. They are completely maintenance free unlike overflow boxes, and are great at skimming the surface despite the looks of them not leading you to believe that.
By the way, about the Tunze waveboxes. I very very highly suggest you see some tanks with these on working properly before spending the money on them. I was kind of suspect of their advertised ability. I saw a couple working on some tanks and was sorely disappointed by their poor performance. I guess they were far from what I expected of them.
Last edited:
SERVO
New member
Awesome, saw that you are posting an upgrade and was really happy to see you back for the SPS attack!!
So after reading through the above posts here is my 2 cents. I would highly consider dgasmd's advice. I have a 400 gallon with three monster overflows splitting the tank into 3 sections. I would love to tear the things out, but I can't drain the tank.
If I could change anything, I would have an external overflow or even an internal "Calfo Style" overflow across the back of the tank. IMO this will prevent problems with flow dynamics as well as limitations for aquascaping.
As for the CL. I have a CL and I hate the thing. I have been running both Tunze streams in addition to the CL (Dart) from day one. I don't like the laminar flow that is generated by the CL and the flexibilty of a 6200 is incredible.
I have a Tunze wave box. I need an extension. I have seen 4 different tanks and IMHO, the amount of wave generation is very impressive. All of the tanks are much smaller than mine BTW. Currently one wavebox in my tank generates a very small shift in the water. Not happy with it in MY tank.
Looking forward to seeing you progress with your project!
So after reading through the above posts here is my 2 cents. I would highly consider dgasmd's advice. I have a 400 gallon with three monster overflows splitting the tank into 3 sections. I would love to tear the things out, but I can't drain the tank.
If I could change anything, I would have an external overflow or even an internal "Calfo Style" overflow across the back of the tank. IMO this will prevent problems with flow dynamics as well as limitations for aquascaping.
As for the CL. I have a CL and I hate the thing. I have been running both Tunze streams in addition to the CL (Dart) from day one. I don't like the laminar flow that is generated by the CL and the flexibilty of a 6200 is incredible.
I have a Tunze wave box. I need an extension. I have seen 4 different tanks and IMHO, the amount of wave generation is very impressive. All of the tanks are much smaller than mine BTW. Currently one wavebox in my tank generates a very small shift in the water. Not happy with it in MY tank.
Looking forward to seeing you progress with your project!
Similar threads
