saintsnsinners
New member
oh ok. think brs sells both styles. maybe find someone who can add a back, then drill the back, drill the back tank and install with a bulkhead.
I think the biggest concern would be the torque on the box. The inside will not be completely full due to the nature of an overflow, so you're going to have a buoyancy issue. The far side of the box will exert vertical buoyancy and this will be magnified like a lever on the bulkheads. You don't generally want this kind of uneven pressure, eventually something is going to fail, whether that's a weak joint/bond or the bulkhead seal.
I would try to re-imagine this with a centrally located overflow, or maybe one that's not quite so long.
I like your idea about the larger section of the box for access to the bulkheads, that's what I was envisioning for one that was centrally located and just square - using the sides and front for the weir.
Something you might consider also is making the internal box out of clear on the bottom, this would reduce the amount of light blockage when you place it under a light fixture, and it won't detract from the aesthetics, meaning, a clear overflow box look ugly because you can see all the plumbing, black walls and clear bottom would still hide the innards.
If the eurobrace is wide enough near the area that you are placing the holes, and is otherwise constructed properly (most aren't), then putting return line bulkheads through the eurobrace is probably ok, as long as the holes are well cut. No matter where you put them I would suggest router cutting them using a template so the holes are as close to perfectly round as possible, because a round hole tends to transmit stresses smoothly around it.
But in general I would avoid large holes in a euro whenever you have another option.