TropTrea
New member
Here is the actual setup that I have (more details):
B- Royal Blue (XTE's)
G- Green (XPE's I think)
C- Cool White (XP-G's)
N- Neutral White (XP-G's)
B-C-B-B-N-B-B-C-B-B-N-B (Row 1)
B-N-B-G-C-B-B-N-G-B-C-B (Row 2)
B-C-B-B-N-B-B-C-B-B-N-B (Row 3)
I'm thinking of going to
B-C-B-B-N-B-B-C-B-B-N-B (Row 1)
N-B-G-C-B-B-N-B-B-C-G-B (Row 2)
B-B-N-B-G-C-B-G-N-B-B-C (Row 3)
B-C-B-B-N-B-B-C-B-B-N-B (Row 4)
My questions are:
Is this too much Green?
Is there enough Red?
Should I replace some royal blues with blues?
Thanks,
Dan
I'[m not real found of the Cool Whites, and much less found of Warm Whites. I personly think the Neutrals are the best with the exception of the CRI-90's. But the CRI=90's are very hard to find at a reasonable price.
Royal Blues are Strong between 450 and 465 nm
Blues are strong between 465 and 485 nm
Cyan are strong from 490 to 510 nm
Greens are strong from 520 to 535 nm
All the whites lack light in the 490 to 500 nm range compared to what they put out at the other frequencies. So regardless wwhich whites you use a little boast in the 490 to 500 range is helpful.
Idealy with all the LED's running together you should have a strong peak in the 465 range and the total light should gradualy diminish as you go to longer wave lenght. If you graphed it, it should look more like slope than a straight line.
Looking at your set up I see no need for the green LED's as your whites should be doing a good job of covering this frequencies. I do think that some blues and Cyans would help you though. I'm running an equal number of blues and royal blues on my set ups to better cover the blue area. I'm also using a few Cyans but no greens.