Why do reefers hate zeovit? I loved it when I ran it. I just got lazy and looked for easier hands off method.
I'd still use Lanthanum chloride but my po4 stays low so it's no longer needed
^^^I think that is a pretty reasonable explanation.
The argument along the lines of "we don't know how it works, it just does, just look at the tanks of the people who use it" is used to sell Air Jordans and magnetic necklaces too. And a fair number of products in the aquarium industry, for that matter.
Because it's not transparent and we've been sold a lot of snake oil the past so some people are skeptical.
There are so many things in this hobby that we have no idea what the ingredients are, yet we all dose them anyway. People don't like zeovit because of the stigma that goes along with it.
Huh? What stigma is that? Your defensiveness in this thread has reached ludicrous speed multiple times. This seems pretty typical of zeo-thumpers: if there's any stigma with the method, it's folks like you that have their ego tied up in it.
I don't put anything in my tank without full ingredients listed. Instant Ocean, B-Ionic, food-grade vinegar, food grade Ca(OH)2, RO/DI water, APBreed TDO...
I wouldn't assume that serious reefers and aquarists don't do the same, if I were you.
Zeostart3 is vinegar mixed with something else but the main active ingredient is vinegar.
Zeobak is microorganisms/bacteria that help reduce no3 and po4. Can I name each and every organisim? No
Zeolite are stones that harbor the bacteria we dose.
That's it, no mystery here...
It's a complete system that's lower both no3 and po4.
They don't have that glowing vibrancy. Yes people have amazing tanks but you can spot a zeo tank from a mile away.
There are so many things in this hobby that we have no idea what the ingredients are, yet we all dose them anyway.
Because it's not transparent and we've been sold a lot of snake oil the past so some people are skeptical.
Okay, so anybody with vinegar, a bacteria source, and stones that harbor bacteria could reproduce the same results in their tank, right?
Because earlier in the thread you stated the following about tanks that do exactly that:
So clearly you believe there is some component of the Zeovit system that sets those tanks apart from others. What is it?
We all? Not true.
Yes that is the basic four. The system really lowers nutrients very well, maybe to good at times. The other additives are for color tweaking.
Okay, so what's the difference between doing that and doing Zeovit?
I find this interesting and i have thought about this when researching for my ZEOvit project this fall.Zeolite are stones that harbor the bacteria we dose.
I do not agree. GFO is just one way to get around N limited carbon dosed tanks. But it might be that we have different views on "basic".Basic carbon dosing still require the use of gfo.
agreed, but it has been around for 10ish years now, although you may not know whats in it you know it works. :thumbsup:
There's not a while lot different. It's more of a complete system, bio pellets require the use of gfo, Basic carbon dosing still require the use of gfo. Also with basic carbon dosing you still sometimes need to add elements that are depleted. Zeovit is a whole system that lowes both no3 and po4 very effectively and then there is additives to help replace what's being exhausted.
Zeovit is just means to help keep lower nutrient environment. People make it out to be the secrect system that magically transforms colors. I don't look at it like that. I used to run bio pellets and always had po4 still so I now use zeovit and I don't have to use anything else but the basic four.
That's what mean when I say stigma. People feel zeovit is some secrect community and when left out feel the need to criticize. They see the success but hate on it cause they aren't sure about it.