ridiculous! Heed your own advice.
Your point being?
ridiculous! Heed your own advice.
I believe there are already several threads on ULNS and zeovit methods.You mean like the post you just made? This thread has the real possibility to help others learn at least something about the Zeo system, that is if people can resist the urge to turn it into something else.
So you don't have anything constructive to add?
You mean like the post you just made? This thread has the real possibility to help others learn at least something about the Zeo system, that is if people can resist the urge to turn it into something else.
So a lot of the ULNS system I see, some of the more Easter egg ones, the corals don't look healthy. Bleached and starved. And that you bleach them on purpose with zeo? Bleaching corals makes absolutely no sense for me whatsoever.
You think so?
Well, yes. I'm not colorblind and the sand is certainly not close to white in any of those photos.
The sand will always be a little off when taking pictures of blue lighting.
The guy is running 22 T5 BLUBS OVER that tank.
With a trained eye you can clearly see the colors through the lighting.
You can't bring out colors that are not there no matter how you adjust the spectrum after, a brown coral will still be a brown coral.
Thats why no one here is questioning the tank but you,
we have seen hundreds of systems on this board to know when somthing is not really there.
The guy has tabling acros that are 25 inches across. Your really think with growth and maturity like that they are brown some how?
The guy is running 22 T5 BLUBS OVER that tank.
The guy has tabling acros that are 25 inches across. Your really think with growth and maturity like that they are brown some how? Did you see the picture I posted?
good post. This goes right back to the OP's original question at the top of the thread.ULNS is an idea, zeo is a method, I used the Blu coral method for a while, I've tried Berlin too. I have a simple understanding of zeo and have used some of the additives in the past, they work OK. Elos works well, Seachem Fuel works well, but none of this is going to make up for what good ole Blue lights can do for you. If you run a 6500k bulb you can get good colors but never the look of a 20k or overly blue tank. It's like comparing a regular old lightbulb to a blacklight or actinic, it changes the appearance or what your eye sees. Ifigure the lighter colored(poisoned if you must) coral are more easily influenced/enhanced by the choice of lighting. Examples are endless but simply put get a neon colored object and put it under actinic lighting vs CFL or sunlight, you know the difference. Is it the natural color no, but can a box full of water really be natural in any aspect when compared to the vast ocean?
1) More than a little in this case. 2) This means the coral colors in the tank photograph are also wrong.
What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
This is 6 x 39 t5 bulbs. Notice that everything looks the color it would be in real life:
What's wrong with actually seeing the real colors... period?
This is a complete crock, and anyone who has grown corals under 6500-10000k bulbs knows it. Browned out corals can look completely different depending on lighting.
You can add me to that list. ESPECIALLY after the bucket/tub photos.
The former statement is not causative for the latter claimed ability.
Sure. Seen thousands of them in the wild. Entire monospecific fields.
Completely brown with the stag having some blue tips? Nothing special at all there. First bucket is even more brown. Bad photos. Photograph them under 5500-6500k with a high color rendering index, then we'll talk.
Perfect. This is much closer to what I would expect these corals to look like under natural light.
This is a staggeringly beautiful reef tank, but it doesn't look substantially different to me than well maintained tanks that don't use the Zeovit method. I guess what I (and others) are looking for is justification for the method if the results are equivalent.