Anybody Else Shoot the Moon????

[Misled]

Moon's as close as it will be for the next 18 years. My first time.

 

[SushiGirl]

Nice shot, thanks for the reminder LOL.

 

[Misled]

It could be sharper, thought about it after I got home, but I'll go out again tomorrow and give it a shot again. It's very bright!!!

 

[SushiGirl]

I noticed it was pretty big and bright last night. Forgot to look when I went out earlier. 'bout to head out again & check it out.

 

[Brett9917]

Uhh, this wasn't from tonight, but this is my moon shot...

 

[Recty]

Of course, my brother has my 100-400 this weekend...

 

[Asureef]

This was my first attempt at shooting the moon when I first got into photography about 3-4yrs ago. Shot using a Canon S3 IS. May try again, since I have access to better equipment now.

 

[XSharkboyX]

I shot some last night... nothing amazing, I only have a 55-250. Will share when I get a chance.
Nice shots to all BTW.

 

[BlueCorn]

Here's mine.

 

[gabew]

The moon was so bright even my crappy p&s could get a photo! I have to say this may be the best photo of the moon I have ever seen.

 

[Jabrams]

I didnt shoot it but, I love this photo by Paco Bellido:

 

[jbmathwiz]

This is cropped way down. But yeah, moon, cool stuff!


Moon

 

[iamwrasseman]

nice pictures and thanks for sharing ! i was fortunate enough to see it last night and it was really cool ,very low though .

 

[XSharkboyX]

I didnt shoot it but, I love this photo by Paco Bellido:

Is this shot a double exposure?

 

[IPT]

Is this shot a double exposure?

No, probably not. Most Likey just had a very distant buliding and a wicked telephoto lens. Funny how optics work like that. It could be a double exposure, but it looks really clean if it was. My guess is it is the real deal.

The image is from some other site I saw and the guy said he looked for the coordinates of the moon rise and planned out the shot accordingly. A lot of planning went into it. If it was a double exposure he could have "made' that shot anytime.

I took some shots but haven't really looked at them yet. I wasn't near anything that really magnified the size so they are "just" moon shots anyway.

 

[marino420td]

Here's mine.

Doug,

Is there anything you're not good at photographing? Nice shot.

It was cloudy in Missouri and we didn't get to see it.

 

[XSharkboyX]

No, probably not. Most Likey just had a very distant buliding and a wicked telephoto lens. Funny how optics work like that. It could be a double exposure, but it looks really clean if it was. My guess is it is the real deal.

The image is from some other site I saw and the guy said he looked for the coordinates of the moon rise and planned out the shot accordingly. A lot of planning went into it. If it was a double exposure he could have "made' that shot anytime.

I took some shots but haven't really looked at them yet. I wasn't near anything that really magnified the size so they are "just" moon shots anyway.

It looks unproportional to me, but i am no expert. I dont think it takes away from the integrity by being a multiple exposure, if it is, its still a great shot imo. I will ask my photoshop instructor on thursday to see what he thinks. I have seen some of his multiple exposure work, and it looks very "clean."

 

[abaralnek]

i tried shooting it but my 45 just couldnt reach,haha..nice pics..

 

[DJ88©]

D7000, 70-300MM VR 4.5-5.6.

 

[BlueCorn]

Doug,

Is there anything you're not good at photographing? Nice shot.

It was cloudy in Missouri and we didn't get to see it.

:lol: - kids and pets.