oreo57
Well-known member
Tell jda that, not me..News flash...T5 will always be more energy efficient than T12, that is one of the reasons it replaced T12.
so it takes 2 T5s to equal a VHO
It takes 2.5W of t12VHO to equal 1 W of t5
Tell jda that, not me..News flash...T5 will always be more energy efficient than T12, that is one of the reasons it replaced T12.
so it takes 2 T5s to equal a VHO
Growing healthy corals isn't always about energy efficiency. I prefer T5 to T12 as a main light but for actintics the T12 VHO still rules. I have yet to see any other bulb or light source with the same look. If you have never used them, you would never know.
(NOTE: none of this has anything to do w/ usability.. separate subject.. it just "is what it is".)
Corals can "look" substandard in coloration but are quite healthy..
VHO is less efficient than HO..
http://www.t5fixtures.com/ho-vs-vho-t5-fixtures/
Oh sooo close...
2 t5HO's 10000lumens.. 1 T5VHO 7200 lumens..off by 39%...
Same spectrum's, PAR will be the same ratio..
Granted all generalizations..
Wow vho ballasts only last 6 months???
I turned a radion on once will it was sitting face down on my chair and it burnt 11 holes in my chair in about 10 seconds
I was surprised by that statement as well. The article is "greenhouse" centric so there is that.Wow vho ballasts only last 6 months???
is a primary selling point..Fully Repairable
That doesn't make sense. I had them running MUCH longer than that in the '80s and '90s.
I'm an electrical engineer too and while I agree that photons are photons, the biological response to spectrum intensity distribution is not. The same goes for the directional nature of the light sources- single source vs multiple directional sources.
I know you're trying not to sound like a know it all, but laughing at people isn't exactly supportive of different ideas.
I'm not taking a side because I think the light sources compliment each other, but they're not the same.
In terms of historical stances, I personally think HQI double ended and mogul designs are not equivalent either. There's room enough in the discussion for everyone to disagree
they just think of the zooxanthellae and photosynthesis with chlorophyll.
All reef-forming corals depend on the photosynthesis performed by their algal symbiont, and such corals are therefore restricted to the photic zone. The intensity of light in this zone declines over several orders of magnitude—from high and damaging levels at the surface to extreme shade conditions at the lower limit1. The ability of corals to tolerate this range implies effective mechanisms for light acclimation and adaptation2. Here we show that the fluorescent pigments3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (FPs) of corals provide a photobiological system for regulating the light environment of coral host tissue. Previous studies have suggested that under low light, FPs may enhance light availability4, 5. We now report that in excessive sunlight FPs are photoprotective; they achieve this by dissipating excess energy at wavelengths of low photosynthetic activity, as well as by reflecting of visible and infrared light by FP-containing chromatophores. We also show that FPs enhance the resistance to mass bleaching of corals during periods of heat stress, which has implications for the effect of environmental stress on the diversity of reef-building corals, such as enhanced survival of a broad range of corals allowing maintenance of habitat diversity.
Acropora coral shows blue colours in response to mechanical damage. Wiedenmann / D'Angelo, Author provided
The ocean has plenty of proof of that. I am curious if you even have a reef tank? You certainly have the ability to look up specs and are a Whiz with Google. I am wondering if all of your knowledge translates into a nice tank as well?
Not picking on you, just curious. Having a nice tank is certainly not required here, many of us are between tanks but still share our years of experience.
Wow vho ballasts only last 6 months???
Here's a good example of DIY LED succeeding or at least sustaining a reef with pictures. I would guess he has before pictures if we ask nicely. On MH/T5 combo prior. Past 2 years on LED. Some coral did well, some not so well. Lessons to be learned here. I've seen this tank in person. Even got frags. I was impressed.
http://reefkeeping.com/joomla/index.php/current-issue/article/162-tank-of-the-month
The tank was switched to use LED lighting 2 years ago. For the prior 6 years, the tank was running on 400 W Radium and four T5 bulbs running on ice cap 660 ballast. Not all corals liked the LED switch. I lost most of my milliporas, after the switch. I should say that all the stags love the LEDs. I am seriously thinking of switching back to Halide and T5 combination or T5 and Led combination.
I think hybrid fixtures are really the way too go when it comes to led.
To be honest. He runs some t-5 with the leds.
He also states:
so he is thinking of switching back too halides or possibly led t5 combo even though he really is now.
I think hybrid fixtures are really the way too go when it comes to led.
I was surprised by that statement as well. The article is "greenhouse" centric so there is that.
And as I was corrected on earlier, T5VHO, not T12..
http://www.coralvue.com/icecap-660-vho-ballast-120vac-60hz
One does have to wonder when this:
Fully repairable
is a primary selling point..
Well it isn't the 80-90's anymore.. Cheap Chinese power caps..
I don't think asking to see evidence of your success is some kind of ridiculous request. I look through the post history for everyone who makes claims here looking for pictures, opinions, past declarations.
If i see page after page of posts about DIY LEDs, but no posts with pictures of an aquarium, all that tells me is that the person may be an expert on creating light with LEDs. Sorry, but I need evidence that corals grow well under that light to believe.