EnglishAl
In Memoriam
IMO the size of complexity of a company has little or nothing to do with the quality of the product. Ford and GM are huge organizations but this does not mean that they make bad products (okay, okay before anyone flames me about the problems with their Taurus I am making a point here!!!).
What I am saying is that unless the size and complexity of the company has led to lazy QA practices or cutting costs by not doing frequent equipment calibrations or validating a process change, then the day-to-day operations should not be affected. I assume these companies have been making these products for quite a while. And I also assume that they train new operators on the correct mixing procedures (if theyââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢re not computer controlled).
Maybe a lot of assumptions but in my experience this is the norm. Having said that, do mistakes happen? Of course they do. I know of a situation with a company I worked for, where bulk material from a tanker truck was pumped into the wrong storage tank. The mistake was caught before it got into the process (by good QA). IMO what seems to have happened here was a mistake with one (or more) batches or there would be far more instances of problems. How just one bucket of salt in a batch delivered to a particular LFS was ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œbadââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ and how these ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œbadââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ buckets got to different parts of the country ââ"šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ I donââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢t know. It depends on how the manufacturer pulls the orders and how many ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œhandsââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ they pass through before they reach the LFS. Maybe LFS owners can let us know if the manufacturer ships direct or through a wholesaler.
One thing that concerns me is that there appears to be no batch codes on the buckets. I know it takes a little extra cost to do this but IMO itââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s money well spent for just such a case as this - the manufacturer can determine what plant, machine, day and time the batch was made so they can go back and determine what happened and prevent it from happening again.
Of course it doesnââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢t help the poor guys like Megalodon and Thomas 712 who lost fish. It would only work if the company found the ââ"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“badââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ batch by routine testing and posted an alert on Forums like RC. Perhaps Megalodon could let us know if, in his talks with IO, he found out about any batch codes.
Cheers
Alan
The above are my opinions and observations based on the information posted in this thread.
What I am saying is that unless the size and complexity of the company has led to lazy QA practices or cutting costs by not doing frequent equipment calibrations or validating a process change, then the day-to-day operations should not be affected. I assume these companies have been making these products for quite a while. And I also assume that they train new operators on the correct mixing procedures (if theyââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢re not computer controlled).
Maybe a lot of assumptions but in my experience this is the norm. Having said that, do mistakes happen? Of course they do. I know of a situation with a company I worked for, where bulk material from a tanker truck was pumped into the wrong storage tank. The mistake was caught before it got into the process (by good QA). IMO what seems to have happened here was a mistake with one (or more) batches or there would be far more instances of problems. How just one bucket of salt in a batch delivered to a particular LFS was ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œbadââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ and how these ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œbadââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ buckets got to different parts of the country ââ"šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ I donââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢t know. It depends on how the manufacturer pulls the orders and how many ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œhandsââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ they pass through before they reach the LFS. Maybe LFS owners can let us know if the manufacturer ships direct or through a wholesaler.
One thing that concerns me is that there appears to be no batch codes on the buckets. I know it takes a little extra cost to do this but IMO itââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s money well spent for just such a case as this - the manufacturer can determine what plant, machine, day and time the batch was made so they can go back and determine what happened and prevent it from happening again.
Of course it doesnââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢t help the poor guys like Megalodon and Thomas 712 who lost fish. It would only work if the company found the ââ"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“badââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ batch by routine testing and posted an alert on Forums like RC. Perhaps Megalodon could let us know if, in his talks with IO, he found out about any batch codes.
Cheers
Alan
The above are my opinions and observations based on the information posted in this thread.