<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7017187#post7017187 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by galleon
Therefore, your aquarium is relatively depleted in Sr relative to natural seawater (World Ocean surface average is about 8.55 mmol/mol)
Iââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢ve been wondering about my long-term use of natural seawater. For the past three years Iââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢ve used nothing but.
I normally change out around 5% a week through skimmate production and siphoning, and then, once every six months, perform back-to-back 30% changes about a week apart. Iââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢m wondering whether that routine is allowing some important elements to become too depleted and thatââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s affecting the health of my most sensitive animals.
I know, with some artificial salt mixes, some ions are available in quantities greater than NSW values (Sr++ being a good example). Maybe the chemists at Instant Ocean tweak those levels higher on purpose?
For the past year Iââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢ve supplemented nothing but Ca(OH)2. Maybe, with NSW, thatââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s simply not enough. This has led me to believe that it may be valuable to go back to using a calcium reactor, even though my alkalinity demand is low. Maybe dissolving calcium reactor media will restore some of those important ions that water changes and Ca(OH)2 supplementation just doesnââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢t adequately take care of?
Lots of questions... not a lot of answers...
The other alternative, of course, would be to perform larger water changes on a more frequent basis.