stony_corals
New member
Hahn - You're taking that too personal, hence my smiley face... again You're one of the few people on this board that knows his stuff.... I won't respond to the other OT stuff.
Like I said in my original post that I don't think lph/wattage is a good measure of a skimmers effectiveness. Imagine 1000 lph in a 6" dia NW, I don't think that would be efficient...
"I think becketts vs. needlewheels should be looked at more. If there was some scientific testing done to determine what the real differences are, perhaps becketts would be justified in the end to some extent, or, the beliefs that some have about them would be shown to be myths."
Well, this was why I posted my initial post in this thread. The consensus is that NW are superior, case closed. I do not think that a true, scientific, study would every be done. It'd end up being like the salt "studies"... I simply presented some anecdotal information on what I found, I have an MBA, I know how to setup up experiements, analyze data, etc. I also did not say that I think becketts/downdrafts are superior, only the results that I found over a short period of time... the systems were not exactly the same in that I didn't measure out the food I fed during that time, and there's a lot of variables that I can not test for without a $1k colorimeter (may be in a couple of months) that can measure organic phosphate levels... The only comment I made was simply that I believe the processing power (turnover) has been underestimated, and this is clearly an area where many (not all) becketts/downdrafts shine relative to many (but not all) NWs....
Like I said in my original post that I don't think lph/wattage is a good measure of a skimmers effectiveness. Imagine 1000 lph in a 6" dia NW, I don't think that would be efficient...
"I think becketts vs. needlewheels should be looked at more. If there was some scientific testing done to determine what the real differences are, perhaps becketts would be justified in the end to some extent, or, the beliefs that some have about them would be shown to be myths."
Well, this was why I posted my initial post in this thread. The consensus is that NW are superior, case closed. I do not think that a true, scientific, study would every be done. It'd end up being like the salt "studies"... I simply presented some anecdotal information on what I found, I have an MBA, I know how to setup up experiements, analyze data, etc. I also did not say that I think becketts/downdrafts are superior, only the results that I found over a short period of time... the systems were not exactly the same in that I didn't measure out the food I fed during that time, and there's a lot of variables that I can not test for without a $1k colorimeter (may be in a couple of months) that can measure organic phosphate levels... The only comment I made was simply that I believe the processing power (turnover) has been underestimated, and this is clearly an area where many (not all) becketts/downdrafts shine relative to many (but not all) NWs....