Can you Help ID this clown?

[EllisJuan]

I picked up a pair of these misbared guys from the LFS. They both look almost exactly the same with this one being the larger of the two. I was told they were tank bred percs...but after looking at some pictures on ORA's site I am not sure.

 

[EllisJuan]

Is the picture not good enough to tell? Is it a complete newb question not worth answering? Is he too ugly to even look at?

 

[chimmike]

Wish I could answer you eLeSJuan

camaro? trans am?

 

[sTefaniA]

I'd say occelaris

 

[chimmike]

it's not a true ocellaris, they've got full stripes
ocellaris:
http://www.bluezooaquatics.com/productDetail.asp?did=1&pid=731&cid=14

looks similar to a misbar:
http://www.orafarm.com/products/fish/clowns/misbar-ocellaris.html

 

[Tahoe Reefer]

He looks like a misbar ocellaris to me

 

[EllisJuan]

wish i could answer you elesjuan

camaro? Trans am?

'04 gto

ls1>*

Go Noles!
<<< Season ticket holder

 

[EllisJuan]

He is definitely a misbar I was just not sure if he is a ocellaris or a Perc. I was told he was a perc by the LFS, but have never really seen an extreme misbar Perc

 

[chimmike]

'04 gto

ls1>*

Go Noles!
<<< Season ticket holder

Good man! :lol:

 

[BeanMachine]

I'd say occelaris

me too, looks like my ORA naked clown.

 

[Sheol]

That is an A. ocellaris, though it does look like a percula at first glance.
Yep, you found 'Nemo". Please, don't shoot the messenger of that joke! <white flag raised> LOL

Matthew

 

[EllisJuan]

So the consensus here is Ocellaris...I wish they would stay still enough for me to count the spines...lol.

Either way, I think they are pretty cool.

 

[chimmike]

Honestly I think it's a misbar ocellaris. If you can trace the history it could be an ORA.

 

[LukFox]

The softer profile makes it look like percula, and from the photo it looks to have a clear iris which is also a percula trait.

 

[jt_milstead]

Misbar Percula.

 

[roushmustang]

i would say misbar occelaris clown

Wish I could answer you eLeSJuan

camaro? trans am?

not bein rude but FORD is where its at
all stock black 2000 v6 stage 1 roush mustang (1 of i believe 185 made) with less than 13,000 miles on it............i destroyed a trans am with the Ls1 engine in it on a straight 1 mile strip where i live :spin3:

 

[chimmike]

i would say misbar occelaris clown



not bein rude but FORD is where its at
all stock black 2000 v6 stage 1 roush mustang (1 of i believe 185 made) with less than 13,000 miles on it............i destroyed a trans am with the Ls1 engine in it on a straight 1 mile strip where i live :spin3:

OT, but:
can't find no specs on the 2006 v6 stage 1 roush, but the stock 3.8 v6 in those made what, 180-190hp? A stage 1 roush would add what, 60hp, maybe? Plus those cars are said to have terrible transmissions........If you beat one, that's a fluke. If you beat five, that's somethin to talk about.

Without forced induction, the v6 mustang pre-2009/2010 was, well, laughable.

I'd put money on my 07 mazdaspeed3 with cold air intake puttin a whoopin' on you.......just like I did an e46 bmw m3 on the highway last month.....well into triple digits

 

[roushmustang]

OT, but:
can't find no specs on the 2006 v6 stage 1 roush, but the stock 3.8 v6 in those made what, 180-190hp? A stage 1 roush would add what, 60hp, maybe? Plus those cars are said to have terrible transmissions........If you beat one, that's a fluke. If you beat five, that's somethin to talk about.

Without forced induction, the v6 mustang pre-2009/2010 was, well, laughable.

I'd put money on my 07 mazdaspeed3 with cold air intake puttin a whoopin' on you.......just like I did an e46 bmw m3 on the highway last month.....well into triple digits

dont want to really start an argument or anything like that

all im saying is i beat it and it was the year with the hood that had 2 scoops that went inwards somewhat and idk if it had a LS1 engine or not ( dont know much about anything gm, pontiac, chevy unless it is the classics)

i cant find specs anywhere as well.... its a 2000 not a 2006 and its puting about 260 hp to the rear wheels and im going to eventualy get it dyno tested for torque as well....

i think roush did a few things to the transmission
here is what is done to the car
1. short throw shifter
2. headers ( i think)
3. cold air intake
4. throttle body (i think)
5. body kit
6. side pipe exhaust
7. lowered ( it sits like 2-3 inches off the ground)
8. big brake kit
9. suspension kit
10. handling kit
11. wheels
12. maybe gears but idk

"horsepower sells cars, torque wins races"-Carroll Shelby

 

[Toddrtrex]

Let's keep this thread on topic.

 

[EllisJuan]

The softer profile makes it look like percula, and from the photo it looks to have a clear iris which is also a percula trait.

The iris is def. clear.

i cant find specs anywhere as well.... its a 2000 not a 2006 and its puting about 260 hp to the rear wheels and im going to eventualy get it dyno tested for torque as well....

"horsepower sells cars, torque wins races"-Carroll Shelby

My GTO made 357hp/361 ft-lb to the wheels...and does ok at the track