phender
Active member
I am a little confused by your statement (not trying to sound argumentative), however you say the water on the reefs is devoid of nutrients yet at the same time if it were not for the reefs the tropical seas would be deserts. Those points seem to contradict each other, but perhaps I am misunderstanding what you are saying?
And I respectfully have to disagree with the assertion that coral reefs are low in nutrient levels, in fact the entire reef biome is driven by nutrients. That is why abundance of life (ie. reefs, tropical, temperate and otherwise) are centered around land masses such as continental shelves or volcanic guyots where they recieve nutrient rich water via wind blown sediments, runoff and upwelling.
And as you said microscopic organisms so prevalent in reefs, which is of course due to the nutrient induced phytoplankton blooms.
Just my $.02
Like the rainforests, reefs sort of create their own nutrients. Run-off from inhabited islands/areas tends to harm coral reefs more than help them.
Compared to temperate and cold seas, the tropical seas don't support much life outside of the coral reefs. The water in tropical seas is very clear compared to temperate and polar seas. This is because the amount of plankton is quite low in the tropics compared to other areas. One of the reasons is that it is harder to float in warm water than cold water.
Some whales visit tropical seas to have their babies and mate, but they can't live there year around. They have to go back to the polar seas to get enough food.
Last edited: