Mr. Wilson, I dont mean for this post to sound rude, but i'm questioning some of the things you're saying.
By all means, question away. We are all here to learn, myself included.
- There shouldn't be more than one defnition for an algae turf scrubber, it is a system that uses high water flow over a screen and with high light to grow attached filamentous algae as a means of water purification. It's used both commerically and in home aquaria.
I said a refugium is "an algae turf scrubber of sorts"; I should have said, an Algae Turf Scrubber is a form of refugium to be more concise. The refugiums I use are as shallow as an ATS, the water is just as rapid, and the lighting is more intense. The only difference is I use higher form of algae (Chaetomorpha & Gracileria), free-floating without a screen. Refugia are not a new idea, I have a Saltwater Aquarium magazine from 1967 showing a marine tank with a remote refugium full of algae in an adjacent sunroom.
-Hair algae is exactly what should be used on an ATS because it is a fast growing algae that readily takes up nutrients. And although some "bleeding" may occur when you are harvesting the algae, the same thing happens when you trim chaetomorpha, as you pull it out from the sump the water drains out, and detritus that has piled up falls into the tank, so i'm not sure that there is much of a difference there.
Harvesting Chaetomorpha does not require the breaking of the thallus or release of its contents. Conversely, hair algae must be torn to harvest the trays. A better ATS system would be to keep the trimmed algae turf trays in a "hospital tank" for a day or two to repair itself. This will not only limit nutrient leak, but also avoid hair algae from spreading to the display tank.
Macro algae will grow equally as fast as hair algae providing the conditions are right. Chaetomorpha will adequately remove Po4 and No3, so there is no need for other forms of algae.
-You say that "algae release (alleopathic) chemicals into the water that may restrict the growth of invertebrates" although this may be true, chaetomorpha is also an algae so it would be do the same thing. As far as i know alleopathic chemicals are usually released by plants during chemical warfare to outcompete eachother, Having only one type of algae should limit the amount of competition therefor the release of these chemicals should be small.
Walnut trees and many terrestrial plants produce these same competitive agents (secondary metabolites). The Walnut tree doesn't need to have neighbours to exude these chemicals and either does algae in any form. The stress of cutting/tearing hair algae will however cause it to react more competitively. Alternating trays with ones in a hospital tank will minimize this problem.
- Simply using activated carbon in the tank will take out any "yellowing" of the water.
Yes, as will protein skimming, UV, Ozone and water changes. Many ATS proponents recommend discontinuing these filtration methods however. Macro algae will also yellow the water to a certain degree, but as you have mentioned, carbon is more than enough to deal with tannins.
-You also state that vertical ATS are a poor design because the vertical pannels cause the algae to tear off and fall, by using turf algae and having a rough screen you should be able to prevent this from happening as turf algae grows in high flow areas. If the hair algae happens to fall off it shouldn't create a problem, it will just be pushed back into the tank and your herbivors will take care of it.
Importing damaged hair or turf (nuisance) algae into the display tank is never a good idea. Neither of these forms of algae grow above the water level so they have not adapted well to do so in aquaria. Vertical ATS cause salt creep, noise, electrical hazard (lighting), add microbubbles, increase evaporation, use too much vertical space, and require too much maintenance.
-The chetomorphia algae also goes through photosynthesis, and respiration so you'll have the same thing happening. Many people just run a reverse cycle on their refugium/ATS lighting so as to have a steady pH, so why not just do this?
Yes, from a photosynthetic standpoint they are the same.
-I'm not sure how the cheatomorpha leaches nutrients at night, it would still be using what it gained during the day for respiration; the same byproducts would be produced during this as in photosynthesis (with the addition of CO2).
It probably doesn't add up to much, but algae does release some of its trapped nutrients at night. They take up nutrients during the day, and cease this action during the night.
In my opinion, elaborate ATS systems are a reinvention of the refugium wheel. ATS gained moderate attention in the late 80's with Addey's book, but anyone who set one up discontinued after a few months or years. Addey had never kept a marine tank at the time he wrote his book on the subject. The tank he set up at the Smithsonian has never been a success story, despite millions of dollars in resources and over 20 years of hard work. There is a promotion company trying to revive the ATS idea to sell plastic screens, but they are banned from more aquarium forums than I can keep track of. The misinformation and junk science offered by these companies give a viable idea like ARS a bad reputation. Yes ATS can work, but they don't offer anything you can't get with a simple refugium.