Diatoms and how they deal with low phosphate found in the open ocean.

Efficient phosphorus use by phytoplankton
December 20, 2010
http://www.brightsurf.com/news/headlines/61598/Efficient_phosphorus_use_by_phytoplankton.html

Rapid turnover and remodelling of lipid membranes could help phytoplankton cope with nutrient scarcity in the open ocean.

A team led by Patrick Martin of the National Oceanography Centre has shown that a species of planktonic marine alga can rapidly change the chemical composition of its cell membranes in response to changes in nutrient supply. The findings indicate that the process may be important for nutrient cycling and the population dynamics of phytoplankton in the open ocean.

Tiny free-floating algae called phytoplankton exist in vast numbers in the upper ocean. Through the process of photosynthesis, they use the energy of sunlight to produce organic compounds required for growth, which draws large amounts of carbon dioxide down from the atmosphere. However, they also need other nutrients such as phosphorus, which is chronically scarce in many oceanic regions.

"We are interested in the adaptations of phytoplankton living in regions where nutrients are in short supply," explained Patrick Martin.

Under normal growth conditions, the cell membranes of phytoplankton contain phosphorus-based lipids called phospholipids. However, it has been appreciated for some time that phytoplankton can exchange their membrane phospholipids with non-phosphorus lipids when phosphorus is in short supply. This substitution saves the cells some phosphorus, which can then be used for other important growth processes such as making new DNA.

"Until now, it has been unclear how rapidly phytoplankton cells are able to change the phosphorus composition of their membranes, and hence whether this process is important over the life-time of individual cells" said Patrick Martin.

To address the issue, he and his collaborators from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in the United States performed growth experiments with a species called Thalassiosira pseudonana, which biologists use as a model species representative of a very important group of phytoplankton called diatoms.

They found that when the diatoms were starved of phosphorus their membrane phospholipids were replaced with lipids lacking phosphorus over a couple of days. Moreover, when the diatoms were re-supplied with phosphorus, they rapidly renewed the phospholipid content of their cell membranes, removing the lipids lacking phosphorus.

"Our research now shows that this substitution, at least in the alga we studied, can take place within 24 hours, and is clearly a physiological response by individual cells to the phosphorus concentration in their environment - as opposed to a longer-term adjustment over successive generations," said Patrick Martin.

The researchers also show that when cells have ample phosphorus, their phospholipids contain a surprisingly large amount of phosphorus. Therefore, if these cells suddenly encounter low phosphorus conditions, they have quite a substantial phosphorus reserve in their lipids, which might be significant for supporting further growth.

"Phosphorus concentrations in the ocean can be locally enhanced by physical features such as eddies in the water, and rapid remodelling of lipid membranes might allow phytoplankton to exploit such conditions," said Patrick Martin.

National Oceanography Centre, Southampton (UK)
 
Cliff,
Another excellent article! Thank you! After reading this many questions come to mind:
1. Are these phytoplankton in our aquariums?
2. Are protein skimmers removing these beneficial phytoplankton? Is there a way to preserve them in our aquaria?
3. Could a sustained supply of these dripped into the reef aquarium cause phosphates to drop. And feed my corals?
4. Could my vodka/ lighting be feeding these phytoplankton in my aquarium today?
5. Could we run a special refugium with these guys and really clean up our tank water?
And the list goes on. I love these types of article's that give me hints into what could be going on in my tank. And what could change the way we reef! Maybe next year I will invest in a nice microscope if time and dollars permit.
Thank you Cliff.........
 
First, I have not read the actual research article and perhaps it has not yet been published. ;)

This article is a bit misleading in that apparently their research was completed on a diatom, Thalassiosira pseudonana. The title of the article and wording used throughout the article implies to me that they are assuming this discovery can apply to all phytoplankton which is a very diverse group of organisms. How they can research one species of diatoms & then refer to all phytoplankton is beyond me, unless there is more to their research than stated in article. :lol:

This is the diatom they researched:

http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Thaps3/Thaps3.home.html

From it:

Tpseudonana.jpg



The Thalassiosira pseudonana genome sequence is composed of "finished chromosomes" (Thaps3) and "unmapped sequence" (Thaps3_bd), which were annotated separately. Please use both portals to make a complete analysis of the genome.

Diatoms are eukaryotic, photosynthetic microorganisms found throughout marine and freshwater ecosystems and are responsible for as much as 20% of global primary productivity. A defining feature of diatom is their ornately patterned silicified cell wall or frustule, which displays such species-specific fine scale nano-structures that diatoms have long been used to test the resolution of optical microscopes.

The marine centric diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana was chosen as the first eukaryotic marine phytoplankton for whole genome sequencing because this species has served as a model for diatom physiology studies, the genus Thalassiosira is cosmopolitan throughout the world's oceans, and the genome is relatively small at 34 mega base pairs.

The clone of T. pseudonana that was sequenced is CCMP 1335 and is available from the Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton. This clone was collected in 1958 from Moriches Bay (Long Island, New York) and has been maintained continuously in culture.

The complete T. pseudonana genome sequence will provide a foundation for interpreting the ecological success of these organisms.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If this information discovered somehow applies to many of our pest algae, diatom & perhaps cyano species, this may help to explain why hobbyists have such a problem eradicating some of these pests from a reef tank, even when phosphate is extremely low in concentration. This a a real jump though. ;)
 
Cliff,
Another excellent article! Thank you! After reading this many questions come to mind:
1. Are these phytoplankton in our aquariums?
2. Are protein skimmers removing these beneficial phytoplankton? Is there a way to preserve them in our aquaria?
3. Could a sustained supply of these dripped into the reef aquarium cause phosphates to drop. And feed my corals?
4. Could my vodka/ lighting be feeding these phytoplankton in my aquarium today?
5. Could we run a special refugium with these guys and really clean up our tank water?
And the list goes on. I love these types of article's that give me hints into what could be going on in my tank. And what could change the way we reef! Maybe next year I will invest in a nice microscope if time and dollars permit.
Thank you Cliff.........

Saw this and it piqued my interest...the oligotrophic oceans are very interesting places to say the least. But to answer your questions:

1) Probably not; plankton from the oligotrophic oceans like the sub-tropical gyre in the N. Pacific have evolved specifically for those conditions (with mechanisms such as the ability to alter their phospholipid composition). These adaptations, however, are energetically costly and their possessors tend not to compete well in more nutrient-rich environments like our tank.

2) Protein skimmers remove a lot of phytoplankton, but whether they decimate the population is a matter of debate. As long as you're not overskimming you probably have a healthy crop. More important to plankton health is nutrient concentration, so skimmers probably do more damage by removing organic matter they could grow on.

3) Again, probably not, but for different reasons. Diatoms tend to be either nitrate- or silicate-limited, rather than phosphate limited (that's the general rule for marine environments). In our aquaria the picture is much the same, especially in regards to silicate limitation. So, if only your phosphate is high, other nutrient limitation will prevent them from drawing it down significantly. As far as feeding corals, most corals feed on larger zooplankton; increasing phyto levels may encourage more zooplankton growth, but it won't feed corals directly.

4) See above re: silicate limitation. Diatoms are unique in their need for silicate, so you likely feed other phytoplankton (that can be just as beneficial for the ecosystem food chain).

5) An interesting thought, but it might be hard to do (once again, the growth limitation issues). Also, you would run into export problems, because for such a filter to really work, you would need to remove the biomass of diatoms. Otherwise, the nutrients just release back into the tank when the plankton die and get degraded.

I teach marine sciences, so I couldn't resist answering those ;)
 
Cliff,
Ahhhh, I wondered about the heading and then "Diatoms" popped????
Ok, well that indeed throws a big wrench into the mix then. Not sure how or why they are generalizing all phytoplankton in with this one project??
Still a interesting article. Seems the nano-world may be as vast as the heavens above is! Really is amazing!
Thanks!
 
Amphiprionocellaris,

I appreciate your posts. :)

From my understanding the phosphate level found around pristine reefs is very low as well as the open ocean. Do you know what the phosphate level difference between a pristine reef and the open ocean might be?
 
Amphi,
Thank you for taking your precious(Christmas break) time to elaborate on some of my questions.
I currently have a 34 gallon SPS tank thats been running for over a year. This little tank has really made me aware of "BALANCE" and how important it really is in all reef tanks.
The skimmers have gotten to be so efficient and people just love to over skim. MYSELF INCLUDED!
I have been schooled some pretty good lessons with this little tank. It's giving me a more magnified look at the dynamics of reef aquaria and whats going on within it.
I do indeed have a healthy population of zooplankton that come out every night after the lights go off.
On occasion, I like to direct them with my flashlight into my plate corals for food!
Thanks again for all the info!!
 
Amphiprionocellaris,

I appreciate your posts. :)

From my understanding the phosphate level found around pristine reefs is very low as well as the open ocean. Do you know what the phosphate level difference between a pristine reef and the open ocean might be?

The levels tend to be very low because the organisms there are very effective at taking up any available nutrients. However, the actual pool (phosphate locked up in biomass etc) is pretty significant as it is with most coastal oceans. The productivity is just so high that the turnover time is very fast and measurable levels are still low. In contrast, the open ocean tends to have both low measurable levels and a low pool size/turnover time (sorry for not giving exact numbers, but I'm away from my work desk which has my books). Of course, as this article suggests, even in the open ocean, life finds a way to sustain productivity.

And reefkeeping is what I do on my break time anyway ;)
 
Like Highland said- that could help explain why some of the pests strains that we have in our tanks are so hard to get rid of. The little btards store the phosphorus like animals store excess energy (ie- body fat.)

But then again- I would think they would focus more on storing silicate or nitrate if those are the factors that generally limit their growth.
 
I remember reading before how silicate becomes limiting in our tanks post initial startup after those diatom blooms die off and are removed. They supposedly are removed via skimming and the silicate as a result is removed. There are people that dose silicate so it would be interesting to see if this would be worthwhile as a nutrient export mechanism.
 
Back
Top