Difference between BK mini 200
- Thread starter scuzy
- Start date
slief
RC Sponsor
Just the footprint. The slim has a slightly slimmer footprint due to the orientation of the pumps inlet and wedge pipe.
The Mini 200 VS13 Extra Slim has a footprint of 220mm x 300mm
See Spec Sheet with detailed dims.
http://royalexclusiv.net/images/content/mbk/eng/mbk_200_VS13_M_eng.pdf
The standard Mini 200 VS13 has a footprint of 265mm x 265mm
See Spec Sheet with detailed dims.
http://royalexclusiv.com/images/content/mbk/eng/mbk_200_VS13_eng.pdf
slief
RC Sponsor
The 200's can handle a heavily stocked 265 without issue. Funny thing is that all too often I hear the term heavily stocked by people who think they have a large load.. A truly heavily stock 250 gallon tank would have in excess of 125" of fish in it or the equivalent of 1/2" of fish per gallon. Most people don't realize that and only think they have a heavy load.
Are you limited on sump space? If not, why aren't you looking at the SM200 or Double Cone 200? Don't get me wrong, the Mini 200 is a GREAT skimmer.
slief
RC Sponsor
That explains the choice in the Mini. I had just edited my previous comment in inquire about sump space.. I think you will love the skimmer. It's a great skimmer and the RD3 pump makes it even better. This is by FAR the best space saving skimmer on the market in every aspect and the build quality is second to none. Something you will notice the moment you pick it up. It's made of very heavy material and the RD3 pump is also much heavier compared to competitors DC style pumps. It's truly a no compromise skimmer in very respect.
slief
RC Sponsor
I wouldn't recommend the Double Cone 180 on anything over a moderately stocked 180 gallons. The specs say it's rated up to 160 gallons but these skimmers are very conservately rated. You could go larger in terms of tank size with a lighter load.
slief
RC Sponsor
That would be my suggestion if space is an issue.
Similar threads
