Maybe you need to post a thread for help with your Ca++ reactor???
In eight months you should have gone through several pounds of aragonite, unless there is almost no (or very little) alk/Ca++ demand. If that is the case, then just kalk-water or two part are a better choice for your system at this time. But this may (liekly will) change over time.
My experience is that:
Kalk water (and baking soda) is (are) great for tanks with minimal alk/ca++ demand This is the easiest (simplest) method and it works well for a primarily soft coral, some stony corals, a clam or two and some fish. This method does not work when there is limited evaporation from the system, or when ca++/Alk demand of the system is very large. E.g., I ran a 100 gallon acrylic with full acrylic covers and the evaporation rate/top off volume was only about 1 gal. per week. I simply could not add enough CaOH in this volume of makeup water.
Two part solutions (actually three parts) is a better method where more stony corals are providing greater alk/ca++ demand (I.e., the Concentraton of Ca++ that can be added with CaCl is much greater than with CaOH). However, in large systems and even in smaller systems with high stony coral loads, dosing becomes costly, more time consuming, and the system salinty can be increased too much. (You end up having to make dilution water exchanges or manipoulating your SW mixing routine.) So, while two part works well, it is not "the simplest" method for these systems. For example, I ran a 55 gal tank with a 40 sump (about 60 gal water volume total) of almost all acro stags and the demand reached/exceeded three ounces daily of each part of two parts. But, I could not add three ounces at once, so I had to manually dose morning and evening, and bedtime. (Yes, a dosing pump would alleviate this). So, when a system's alk/Ca++ demand increases to the point where you are constantly preparing two part solutions and are having to make dilutions (essentially extra water changes), then Ca++ reactors become "the simplest method"- even though previously for the same system, the Ca++ reactor was the more complex choice.
Lastly, keep in mind, all of these "tools" do not necessarily need to be used alone.
--- Ca++ reactors can be run on minimum alk settings and two part dosing can be used for finer control of parameters.
--- Ca++ reactors can hold dolomite, and when used as described above, can eliminate the third part (Mg) additions.
--- And, a kalk reactor for makeup water combined with Ca++ reactor works better to keep the Ca++/Alk balance in check then does just running a ca++ reactor alone, or a kalk ractor with occasional baking soda.
I hope this info helps you see there is no one best choice. But rather there's what is best for me and my system today. (Tomorrow, it may change,even if you have the same DT and sump, but have a differnet population.)
Chuck
If I do make the switch I would probablly keep the kalk reactor and ditch the CA reactor. Would this be the way to go if I go that route? I would hate to give up the calc reactor but im just not sure what it is doing. My media hasn't gone down since i have been using it (8 months) and my ph remains kind of low. My levels all seem to always be were i want them but that could just be because of my weekly water changes. Non of my sps would be considered colony size and most are still 1" frags but have been that way for a while only to see short growth sperts every once and awhile. I think that 2 part would be an easier way for me to supplement since I can't seem to dial in the reactor.