drummereef
Team RC
The rockwork looks great. The different angle shots, show the depth & openness very well. It looks like you nailed it!:beer:
Thanks 110! It's really starting to look good underwater.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aeb5/3aeb5f3d55a367644c1d14977f963bfad23769a9" alt="Big grin :D :D"
The rockwork looks great. The different angle shots, show the depth & openness very well. It looks like you nailed it!:beer:
You only have 68 lbs in there!? It looks like a lot more then that.
Is 68# enuf for a 180??
Or you gonna dump a bunch in a fuge??
I think the lb/gallon thing is a pretty bad rule of thumb. It looks like you will have plenty of surface area for biofilm growth, especially since you also have sand in the display.
Its going to be really fun watching this tank mature. Thought of a fish list yet?
Just read the hole thread ha, excited to see pics with the whole thing up man....are you going to have more sps, mixed, or softy tank?
UPDATE:
Sump is almost full so I started up the return pump. Everything looks good. There were a couple of minor leaks but got those taken care of. So far I've added the 200g box of IO salt but the salinity is still a little low. Need to pick up another bucket tomorrow. As I'm adding salt I'm trying to figure total running gallons of the system while I can. Something I didn't do with my 40g I wished I had.
On another note... I'm thinking about starting the cycle with a piece of raw cocktail shrimp. Anyone opposed to that?I'm also going to get a tiny bit of live sand, possibly from the LFS, to seed the tank but it will be a couple days before I can get over there. That's why I was wanting to get it moving with the shrimp.
Thoughts?
UPDATE:
On another note... I'm thinking about starting the cycle with a piece of raw cocktail shrimp. Anyone opposed to that?I'm also going to get a tiny bit of live sand, possibly from the LFS, to seed the tank but it will be a couple days before I can get over there. That's why I was wanting to get it moving with the shrimp.
Thoughts?
It is my own opinion, but I think the cycling thing is a tad overrated. Maybe for fresh water Chiclid tanks where tap water is used, etc.
I started my cycle with my a fresh raw piece of shrimp, just put it in a high flow area. Another option is to just let your live rock start the cycle.
Brett,
I found that it took far less the cycle my new build when I put online. I was a bit nervous too and only had hours not days to switch the two tanks over. I simply cycled 120 lbs of dry rock in saltwater brute drum, used LiveSand, some old pieces of rock from existing tank and about 25% of the old water. It is my own opinion, but I think the cycling thing is a tad overrated. Maybe for fresh water Chiclid tanks where tap water is used, etc.
As mentioned, I did not have the luxury of time and did the transition in 6-hours. I only lost one fish and no sps. I think you will be in good shape to slowly start adding some coral and hardy fish from your 40-gl setup at the end of the week imo.
HTH
When using live rock which has been shipped from far places, or been brewing in those nasty vats at the LFS, a cycle is not over-rated. When there's a good amount of death and decay on the rock, you're going to have elevated ammonia for a time.
In this case, though, I may agree. When using base rock, there's nothing that will rot, so you're unlikely to have a true cycle. I would NOT bother adding any dead shrimp (why introduce decay when that's what you're trying to avoid in the first place?), simply start seeding the tank to allow bacteria to colonize (grab some rubble from your other tank, or LFS sand), then start adding livestock SLOWLY. You've got to take your time when adding livestock to allow the bacteria colonies to properly adjust to the new bioload. After a couple months, you'll be in great shape.
If you add livestock too quickly, I've read that bacteria will reproduce very rapidly, get to the point of not having enough food source, much of it will die off, and then your tank has inadequate denitrifying bacteria to handle the bioload, at which point you may notice elevated ammonia levels (and serious issues with coral/fish). By adding livestock slowly, while some of this still happens, it is not to the affect that you would cause problems. Make sense?
I dunno if it would be a waste of money, but maybe not the best allocation of funds.You may be just as well off getting a small piece of rock from your other tank, but if you're worried about cross contamination, maybe it's worth the couple bucks to buy the Seachem product.
which brings up the topic... what kind of QT setup are you going to employee? Have you mentioned that yet?
:lol: Yeah, my 40g is too high risk to transfer anything but fish at this point. The rock in there is literally from over 10 years ago. The hobby was much different then and we didn't know a lot about pests when I bought the rock. Needless to say my 40 has a major hydroid and spionid worm issue. It's a functioning tank but I wouldn't think of transferring anything but fish from it.All the coral will be sold to my LFS for store credit.
As for a QT setup I have a 10g tank that would work but I might go by a 20 or 29g so I have a more versatile setup. I'll just use the foam from an Aquaclear HOB filter and seed it from the sump. I have a leftover heater that will work too. Am I forgetting anything?
Probably not. So that's for fish only, or would you use it for corals as well? It may be a bit small for tangs or other larger fish. I've found they're as likely to be lost from inadequate QT size as from pests/disease. that's something I'm excited about once I get a new display tank running... the 120 gallon stock tank I built will be run independently from the main display, effectively making it a QT (though I'll grow out coral there as well).