EC,
I'm not going to sift thru your comments and quote/ retort some of your statements but you are waaaaaay off base on some of your assumptions. There are other corals present on the lagoon side aside from what is shown on the photo's of the coral propagation rack. It's not "˜full' of rubble and dead coral like you assume.
I'm not the one doing the assuming here. I didn't say that "lagoons" were "full" of rubble and dead corals. If anything, I said the area where these racks are, is full of rubble and dead corals. Of course there are corals that live in lagoons. "Coral" can live in many habitats, including the deep ocean. I never said there wasn't living coral in a lagoon. There are many different habitats that can be found in lagoons. Silt beds, sandy areas, rubble zones, grass flats, hard bottom, patch reefs................ A lagoon is still a lagoon, no matter what habitat you happen to be in within the lagoon.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...HxgT-DXFKXW2AWxmZWACA&ved=0CFwQ9QEwBg&dur=818
The types of corals that are growing in the shallow lagoons vary a bit from what you'll find at deeper depths, but nevertheless it's a growing reef,
See the diagram above. A lagoon is a lagoon. It is not a "growing reef". It may contain patch reefs that are growing, but a lagoon is a lagoon.
The internet is a double edged sword. It provides information to everyone that wasn't available to masses 20 years ago but there's no substitution for actual experience and seeing and observing the environment"¦"¦"¦verses attending "˜Google State University' behind a computer screen.
look at the date I joined this site. That's the date I became active on the internet. Roughly five years ago. I have twenty years of studying, and swimming on and around coral reefs, prior to that. It's hard to say I'm simply a graduate of "Google State University".
My concern is someone is going to read some of your posts, and take it as gospel;
I don't know about "gospel", but if someone reads my posts and it causes them to keep their pets in a clean, nutrient poor, and healthy environment where they can flourish, I haven't wasted my time.
however a large percentage of your assumptions are just plain full of holes, at best.
Please, by all means. Show us these holes. It is completely meaningless to say that someone is wrong without the ability to explain how they're wrong, or provide evidence that shows they're wrong.
Corals are more resilient than you think
I think we/I understand full well how resilient corals can be. We farm them in very harsh environments, we stuff then in tiny bags and ship them all over the globe, we package and unpackage them multiple times, we expose them to extremes of temperature, we mix them in containers exposing them to infectious microbes and parasites they may have never come in contact with, and yet many still manage to survive and make it to our tanks.
It's not about how "resilient" these animals can be. It's about providing them with a habitat they can grow and flourish in. We want our corals to grow, prosper, and be with us for years to come. For that, they need clean, healthy, nutrient poor, environments. Not nutrient laden swamps.
and nutrient levels are not the driving factor whether a reef prospers or is in decline.
What is "the driving factor"????
I'll quit posting to this thread, seems a moot point, albeit good for info-tainment.
So you post to say I'm wrong, while providing absolutely nothing to back up your statements, then leave. Well......bye bye then.:wave: