Fairy Wrasses, need identifying

Rolldmntide88

New member
Hello all,
My first post here. I have been looking for some not so common fairy wrasses after growing bored with the usual suspects. Got these the other day but of course they come from the store with some pretty ambiguous names.
Anyone have any insight?
Thanks

I apologize for picture quality, I couldn't figure out how to upload original video.
 

Attachments

  • screenshot.jpg
    screenshot.jpg
    71.6 KB · Views: 0
I owned a pair of pintails once, great fish. Make sure your screened lid is secure.

Cirrhilabrus cf. lanceolatus I believe is the correct name. Note the "cf" this is the dwarf or smaller version of the pintail is what you have.

The Cirrhilabrus lanceolatus is the larger one.
 
Great, thanks for the information.
The one who's tail is not visible in the picture has a tail that comes to a point, unlike the more visible one with a forked tail.
Crimson, are you implying they are the same species (one being a subspecies) as I was under the impression they were two totally different fish.

When I google pintail fairy wrasse (thanks to yall's input) its pretty clear the fish facing the camera is what people are calling a pintail wrasse.
 
I have had fairy wrasse jump through a single 1/2 inch hole/crack, on a full canopy... more than once. Simply an open back on a full canopy is a guaranteed loss with time. Most frustrating species I have kept in that regard, just an FYI, but also one of my favorites!
 
Crimson, are you implying they are the same species (one being a subspecies) as I was under the impression they were two totally different fish...

Note the "cf" this is the dwarf or smaller version of the pintail is what you have.

The abbreviation cf. comes from the Latin word conferre, which means "œcompare to" or "œconfer." ... means that the person using the name is saying the fish should be compared to a given species, as it might not be exactly the same species...nothing to do with size
 
The one on the top is a Cirrhilabrus Isosceles and the one on the bottom is a Cirrhilabrus Lunatus. The Isosceles used to be labled as a Cirrhilabrus cf. Lanceolatus.
 
They are both in the Lanceolatus Complex, meaning one needs to become more dominant than the other and may lead to a lot of fighting till one becomes dominant.
 
No. There is only one pintail wrasse, the C. Isosceles. There is the Lanceolatus which is a multiple thousand dollar fish. Before the Isosceles had a name it was the C cf. Lanceolatus as Albano said, it was compared to the Lanceolatus, though it’s a whole different species.
 
No. There is only one pintail wrasse, the C. Isosceles. There is the Lanceolatus which is a multiple thousand dollar fish. Before the Isosceles had a name it was the C cf. Lanceolatus as Albano said, it was compared to the Lanceolatus, though it's a whole different species.

I owned two when they first started to be available back in 2013. They were expensive. I remember having conversations with you before about them. Anyway, I haven't been keeping up on fairy wrasses since I downsized and did not know the name change.

Ended up selling them and my rhomboid to a local who was very happy to have them.
 
Very nice. Both tend to be on the less side. Depending on the size of the tank, since they were added at the same time, should be fine together.
 
I was wondering if that was it. I plan to admire from afar in that case. Maybe someday, lol. Too new for that!
 
Back
Top