Fast/slow growers, really?

Fast/slow growers, really?

  • Yes

    Votes: 82 88.2%
  • No

    Votes: 7 7.5%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 4 4.3%

  • Total voters
    93
  • Poll closed .
ugly brown palies grow faster then any other polyp out there lol.

mucho that question would be a hard to prove one. and people get confused from a paly to a zoa, i do feel the palies grow at a much faster rate then zoa's, now that would be a question also and why would they? alot of the test done reguardless how alike or close can never truelly be compared, for the simple fact of a inch differance in placement can effect everything
 
Part 1


Remember the day you established your first tank or maybe even the current system you have, and the excitement of anticipated growth of your new acquisitions? Remember all the tanks you've viewed on line, in your LFS and via any research you might have performed with hopes of replicating those stunning reefs and their exceptional growth? Then it happened, your system didn't yield that growth, some no growth at all and still others whose polyps simply withered and crashed within days or weeks of arrival.

I created this thread/poll to help prove or dispel a prevailing belief. I will allow you to decide what is fact or fiction and hopefully we can continue to discuss it. We will respect everyone's opinion, good or bad, right or wrong, it's just an opinion ok?

The question remains, are their inherently fast and slow growers as it relates to zoanthids and palythoas in aquaria? In my opinion, I would say emphatically, NO, not in captivity/aquaria, but there’s a reason I say that. "But Mucho, my LFS, the on line vendor who sold them to me, the guy at the frag swap, all assured me when I purchased them that they were fast/slow growers". In my above post, you will see tons of very insightful feedback you all provided, great stuff by the way. I chose to wait before replying in hopes that many would do just that and say what I've always held to be true and have stated for nearly 10 years now. Definitive labels of fast and slow growers in captivity is a myth in my opinion and should be placed in the same category of most of what's in this link below. The specific captive care you give your tank is the sole determining factor in your polyps rate of growth and not by virtue of its name or label someone gave it. ( No disrespect to my reefing buddies who believe otherwise :). "Fast growers" is most often used as a marketing/selling tool, to generate excitement, because it’s what others have been told and the myth is perpetuated. Don't attack me, just read a bit longer and we can discuss it.


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1590992&highlight=myth



Zoanthids and palythoas are found in the wild in diverse yet similar conditions throughout the world. Each of course is thriving in that particular environment which is obviously most conducive for optimal growth I would say or they wouldn’t be there or thriving at all in the first place. Keep in mind, even the vast oceans of the world themselves are not stable and there are varying degrees of flucuation of the exact parameters we strive so hard to maintain. Thus in the wild, I believe they will grow at their optimal rate due to optimal conditions or the conditions they thrive in. Keep in mind however that some of those conditions seem less then optimal or favourable to the average reefer. They've been found at depths of 5600 meters as well as in shallow tidal pools and being completely exposed during low tide. Some are thriving in pristine clear water while others have been discovered near sewage run offs. “But Mucho, you’ve proven nothing.” Hang with me a minute longer.


Take a look at this photo from the Kusu Island in Singapore. Notice the vast mature colonies proliferating in a carpet-like manner in every direction. Can anyone specify which ones are the fast growers and which are the slow growers? NO !!!!!! they are all thriving. Why?

zoafield.jpg



Below you find a series of pictures from TCU’s tank.

In the first picture you’ll find a fairly decent size colony of zoanthids.

TCU1-1.jpg


In the second picture you’ll notice what appears to be the same zoanthids which are now propagating like weeds across the substrate.

TCU2-1.jpg


In this photo you’ll see propagation in every direction with exponential growth.

TCU3-3.png


So why did I choose these photos? This particular morph is one of the first zoanthids I ever owned. Knock on wood, I was able to grow everything in my system to the point that every single inch of rock in my system was covered literally with thousands of polyps. I treated my tank as if it were another human and just treated it like a baby. I mean I could grow anything, I had the proverbial blue thumb. But guess what? I couldn’t grow this particular morph no matter how I tried. But wait a minute, everything else grew like weeds, so why not this particular zoanthid? I mean just look at the growth in TCU’s tank, isn’t it a fast grower by todays beliefs and standards? Doesn’t that mean it’s a fast grower? True enough, we don’t know the time frame of said growth in his tank, but it sure looks like a fast grower doesn’t it? Here’s my point, again, in my opinion, there is no such thing as a fast grower or slow grower in captivity, just variables which dictates growth rate, fast or slow, and that’s you, what you do and how you do it as it relates to your system. If something is a fast or slow grower by virtue of what you were told or its label, then it is going to grow as such in your tank, my tank and Peter’s tank. But we all know that doesn’t happen. More specifically, what dictates growth is tank maturity, lighting type, source, wattage, height of placement, thus PAR, parameters levels/readings i.e. PH, KH, Cal etc, salinity, minute fluctuations, nutrient levels/source, temperature, bio load, current and type, reduction of stress via keeping your hands out of your tank thus not fragging every new polyp you see, not moving your corals around constantly and overall sound husbandry is what will more specifically dictate your growth rate or growth at all.


Here’s a series of pics from my buddy Geoxman's tanks. Again, can anyone pic out the fast and the slow growers? Again, you can’t. What grows well in one tank, doesn't mean said rate can and will be reproduced by another.

geo2-1.jpg


geo4-1.jpg


geo3-1.jpg




Pics of Archie's tank

archie-1.jpg


What you can see are two very diligent reefers who listened to their systems and knows what thrives in their particular systems and what doesn’t. Every morph isn’t going to thrive in your or my system no matter what you do. Not because they won't survive in captivity, not because they are perpetual melters, but some require a slightly different parameter level than what you may or may not maintain or even have knowledge of. I have taken polyps which my buddy who locally told me they are impossible to keep, and they thrived in my tank. Conversely, I have given small colonies to local reefers who grew what I couldn't grow in my system. One was labeled a fast grower and the other a slow grower, yet both prospered in our own individual tanks in conditions best suited for optimal growth.

Zoanthids and Palythoas are not baseball cards or Beanie babies that we buy, place in our systems, then take them out, then trade, sell, buy a new set then repeat the process. In fact, the process of persistent movement, hands in your tank constantly and the lack of diligent husbandry is even more detrimental to your polyps in the short and long term.


If a polyp is a fast grower…then it’s a fast grower. No web site, no seller and certainly not even Peter the Polyp Pimp is going to tell you they are fast growers if you do A, B C and D. If it is a fast grower, then it’s going to grow fast in your tank, my tank and Peter the Polyp Pimp’s tank right? But his is not the basis of corals reproduce. There is no posted growth chart or scale of expected growth if you buy this polyp or that polyp. What grows fast in my tank doesn't necessarily mean it will grow equally as fast in your tank, and maybe not at all and vice versa.

We can now add to those variables which might be to the detriment or success of your growth rate, these factors. In 2005 we saw the beginning of excessive, redundant, improper and premature fragging of frags with the advent of names and sky high pricing which began in 2005. We now have 4 polyps on a plug being referred to as a colony and when the 5th polyp sprouts, it is chopped off. I have personally spoken to hundreds of reefers over the years here and on other sites as well as here in my own town whom had issues with growth. Through discussion via Q & A, the results of their polyp mortality, slow growth or no growth was due to many of those variables listed above. Yes, improper, excessive, premature and excessively redundant fragging will stunt growth rate and in many cases cause the very mortality we all try to avoid. Polyps which were sold as fast growers in fact never grew at all and most died within days. “Sorry, still not convinced yet Mooch.”


Some even say the more expensive they are, the slower they grow. Think about that, we’ll come back to it later.

Something else that truly makes me smile are all the list on the web There’s a list of the fast growers, the slower growers and the perpetual melters. There are those who will say emphatically that this or that particular morph can’t be grown in captivity………solely because they couldn’t, Billy Ray couldn’t and not even Peter. This simply means they did not meet the individual requirements for that particular polyp to thrive. Remember, diverse conditions, you can’t possibly meet the conditions to house every zoanthid and palythoa from around the world. I feel my success with growing polyps was due to the overt attention of just listening to my tank. Then tweaking my system and all of my parameters to find a happy medium for most all of what I acquired to grow and thrive to the point of explosive growth covering every inch of live rock.

I wrote this piece over a year ago, and believe it or not, most of it details exactly what many of you have stated in post #38 which is why I waited until today to reply. “Sorry Mooch, still not convince”.

Well, I’m not trying to convince you my friend, just stating my opinion is all. You don’t have to agree with anything I’ve said. I just want to spark a discussion on a topic of great interest and misperception.

Let’s take the ultimate test here for any skeptics. What if I told you, for every polyp or named polyp that someone has stated right here in this forum or any zoanthid forum as being a fast or slower grower, I can show you another reefers who has stated just the opposite about that exact same polyp. WHAAAT !!!!!! …how can that be true? Well, I’ve already done it, been doing it for years. Whenever I see or read that someone has stated something is a fast grower or a slow grower, I instantly begin to do some searching. If I didn’t find a polar contradiction right here in this forum, I took to the web and Googled it, other zoanthid forums and true enough, I always found that contradiction. As much as I hate names, stop here and search this forum and look at the growth experience of RASTAS.

I recently visited visited a region far away rom my home state. I stopped by a LFS there and just browsed. I struck up a conversation with a guy and sooner than later, it evolved into a discussion on growth. I listened as he pointed to a small frag of 10 polyps in the display tank and he told me those were rare and they are very slow growers and that’s why no one has bought them. My jaw dropped but I closed it quickly. I listened to the point of stopping him. I walked over to the store owner whom I had just spoken to for 20 minutes. I asked if I could pull up something on his PC. I went to a picture on line that I posted back in 2003. I then pointed to nearly 200 polyps of what he was purporting to be both rare and a slow grower. I assured him they were neither, but this is what he had been lead to believe for many many years.

Take a look at a collection of very informative threads on growth. There are many reefers who have contributed to these threads and there’s a vast array of knowledge, opinions and detailed information which I hope you’ll enjoy reading.


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=729863&highlight=growth


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1861820&highlight=fast+growers+mucho


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1449744&highlight=growth+rate+goldmaniac


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2148330&highlight=fast+growers+mucho


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2223468


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1975481&highlight=fast+growers+mucho


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2117947&highlight=growth


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=729863&highlight=growth


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=729863&highlight=growth


http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2210927&highlight=growth



In closing, polyps can and will thrive in the wild. In captivity, their morphology can and will change due to all those growth variables Iisted above. Color, polyp size, length, growth rate, skirt length all are affected by what has been discussed in this thread.

That said, I’ll leave you with a quote by NyReefNoob regarding the topic of fast growers. “Mucho that question would be a hard to prove one”.

And I agree.

Thanks for taking the time to read along. Don’t shoot the messenger, just post your opinion even if it is a complete departure from my beliefs, I want to hear your opinion as well. I yield the floor.


MUCHO REEF
TOTM – August 2003


PS. I want to leave you with this picture of a mound of Palythoa Caribearum. Just listen to your reef, read and research as much as possible, keep your hands out of your tank, and just allow them to grow.

palythoacaribeaorumgreebseamats.jpg
 
Last edited:
Mooch

I figured I would address this to you since you are running this pony show as the OP but as always anyone who has an answer please respond.

When this thread first started and I thought about my answer there was something that was in the back of my mind that was bothering me but I did not know what until I looked through the links. Though I have read them before and will again I have missed something important.

How do we define fast and slow growth? Because we are discussing growth we are discussing a rate therefore we are describing a change over a specific period of time.

Often people make statements saying they had a growth of 10 polyps in a month's time but not always. Exactly where is the break point between the two?

Also would you consider the size of the colony or frag as part of this?

For example we could say colony #1 had 1 polyp of growth per 5 colonial polyps per 30 days and colony #2 had 1 polyp of growth per 2 colonial polyps per 30 days.

Obviously #2 has a faster rate than #1 but is #2 a fast or slow grower?

This line of thinking is outside the original context of your question but it is relevant and another fun topic of discussion.
 
Mooch

Yes sir

I figured I would address this to you since you are running this pony show as the OP but as always anyone who has an answer please respond.

LOL, that would be me runnin the pony :deadhorse1: LOL.

When this thread first started and I thought about my answer there was something that was in the back of my mind that was bothering me but I did not know what until I looked through the links. Though I have read them before and will again I have missed something important.

I'm all ears

How do we define fast and slow growth? Because we are discussing growth we are discussing a rate therefore we are describing a change over a specific period of time.

Hmmm, I was hoping those who make the claim or have made it in the pass in reference to fast growers would tell us just what rate of growth fast growers consist of. Since I don't believe there is a list of fast growers in captivity as the contradiction are many in both directions.

If Peter can produces 10 polyps on average or per month in his tank, and they have been labeled fast growers, then by virtue of this broad claim from Peter and the vendor he purchased them from, then 10 would be the minimal standard. I say if Timmy purchased those same polyps from the same vendor at the exact same time and date, he is not going to produce 10 polyps in the exact same time frame. I have seen it more times than you can imagine. Those polyps will not reproduce at the same rate in everyone's tank. It's not going to happen, yet when Peter sells his first 2 new polyps that he frags at the end of the month and sells them to Tina, they may very well grow at an even slower rate then Timmy's polyps who only produce 4 polyps that same month. The myth is then perpetuated and the trend continues.


Often people make statements saying they had a growth of 10 polyps in a month's time but not always. Exactly where is the break point between the two?

I have no idea my friend. I would hope those who make the claim would share their experience on this. I want to know what is the rate of growth that makes it a fast grower? I have seen something labeled a very fast grower and it didn't produce a single polyp in an entire year.

Patience is vital in reefing. I never spent a waking minute watching, waiting, counting, hoping my polyps would grow and neither did my group of local reefing buddies. We didn't split polyps, we didn't target feed either. My focus was and is husbandry, documentation, maintaining a strict maint schedule, keeping my hands out of my tank, watching my parameters and allowing my reef to do what it wanted to do and when. That's when I had explosive growth.


Also would you consider the size of the colony or frag as part of this?

Could you be more specific?

In my opinion, it doesn't matter. When I see these 2 and 3 polyps, not all but some, on a flat head plug being sold, they are telling reefers on the spot it is a fast grower. I have never heard anyone say it is a fast grower once it becomes a mother colony. So I guess I would say it doesn't matter. Shipping, bagging, moving, handling, dipping etc are all stressful albeit tolerable stress to new acquisition, thus they will need time to adjust, acclimate and settle in. This is why we see periodic retraction upon initial placement. ( btw, I know you know all of this already, just speaking in general here) I would say after this period, hey, I'll say let's give it a month, 30 days after that we should be seeing that fast growth that is labeled as, wouldn't you agree? But it just doesn't work that way.

LOL, I'm talking too much man, I wann know what you think. I want to just listen to what you guys/gals think and feel on this topic.


For example we could say colony #1 had 1 polyp of growth per 5 colonial polyps per 30 days and colony #2 had 1 polyp of growth per 2 colonial polyps per 30 days.

Obviously #2 has a faster rate than #1 but is #2 a fast or slow grower?

This line of thinking is outside the original context of your question but it is relevant and another fun topic of discussion.


I guess I want to here what a fast grower is before I reply. I had a rock slightly larger than a baseball that I seeded wih 6 red/burgundy polyps many years ago. I placed it in a sweet spot in my tank. In less than 2 months, that rock was covered. I even have a picture of it. That's not fast growth, that is steroid growth. So is the growth I had the standard? I did the same with a slightly smaller rock, it took about twice as long, even growing faster than mature and stable mother colonies. Again, since I don't believe there inherent fast growers, I would have to yield to the floor on this one.


I do see your point and would love to hear what you think my friend and thank you for your reply and feedback.

Mooch
 
Thank you and I appreciate all your work.

I don't think you are going to get answers to your questions because:

1. There really isn't an answer ie no one really knows since it is subjective.
2. Those that may have an answer such as a seller really wouldn't want to give that answer would they? "But you said they were fast growers and I have had one new polyp in 6 months...."

As far as the specifics to my answer what I meant was if someone had a 100 polyp colony and it grew 1 polyp each month, they fragged it, and sold it, they could claim that this was a slow grower because it only increased by 1% each month.

If someone had a 1 polyp "mini colony" (ok I have never seen anyone call something that small a mini colony but I have seen a 4 polyp mini colony being sold) and gets 1 polyp growth each month then it increased 100%. Is this the "fast grower" that everyone talks about?

Again I don't know but I am interested in the subject. This reminds me of something that I wrote back in October that I need to post that relates to this and a few other subjects.


I will leave you with this: The physical environment shapes the biological community.


This is why restoration efforts are so difficult. You can keep reintroducing the community but if the environment cannot sustain it then time, money and resources have been wasted.

Sounds just like our systems doesn't it?

Take care.
 
Thanks again, and you said something that I will zero in on that sticks out like a tonga branch and that is this statement.

"1. There really isn't an answer ie no one really knows since it is subjective."


If no one knows, and it's purely subjective, then why is it so widely used and excepted, believed and repeated? It's no different then the over used terms, "Rare, lineage, JPDW, just released, limited edition one of a kind, new to the market, the ocean is only releasing 5 of these this year :lol2:, etc etc etc yadda yadda yadda. People are actually spending hard earned money buying corals based upon a misleading statement with expections of fast growth from polyps which won't and quit often perish to say the least. There are no guarantees in reefing. I agree that it is a subjective marketing label used for a purpose, much like all the others. I mean, we can't even quantify what a fast grower is.

I think we should take the discussion even beyond what a fast grower is since growth in one tank will never be replicated on a consistent basis in another. I can revert back to what everyone has posted thus far and what is listed in the links I provided above. We can further proceed with debunking the fast grower claim by doing the search as I stated above on that particular polyp which reveals the contradictions across the board. Then again, I could be 100% wrong. I just wanted to create a discussion is all. Hey, I tried.

There's another part of this that I would like to discuss with you, but me eyes are getting a we bit tired, LOL. Talk tomorrow my friend and thanks again.


MUCHO REEF
TOTM - August 2003
 
Last edited:
Thanks again, and you said something that I will zero in on that sticks out like a tonga branch and that is this statement.

"1. There really isn't an answer ie no one really knows since it is subjective."


If no one knows, and it's purely subjective, then why is it so widely used and excepted, believed and repeated?

I believe it is accepted because when people hear they are fast growers they buy them hoping to make their money back. It could also be that the people that get slow growth hates to admit they get slow growth for fear of people thinking they don't know what they are doing. With the so called slow growers people buy them thinking they are rare because they are slow growers hoping they can make the big bucks off of them.

It's no different then the over used terms, "Rare, lineage, JPDW, just released, limited edition one of a kind, new to the market, the ocean is only releasing 5 of these this year :lol2:, etc etc etc yadda yadda yadda. People are actually spending hard earned money buying corals based upon a misleading statement with expections of fast growth from polyps which won't and quit often perish to say the least. There are no guarantees in reefing. I agree that it is a subjective marketing label used for a purpose, much like all the others. I mean, we can't even quantify what a fast grower is.

I think we should take the discussion even beyond what a fast grower is since growth in one tank will never be replicated on a consistent basis in another. I can revert back to what everyone has posted thus far and what is listed in the links I provided above. We can further proceed with debunking the fast grower claim by doing the search as I stated above on that particular polyp which reveals the contradictions across the board. Then again, I could be 100% wrong. I just wanted to create a discussion is all. Hey, I tried.

There's another part of this that I would like to discuss with you, but me eyes are getting a we bit tired, LOL. Talk tomorrow my friend and thanks again.


MUCHO REEF
TOTM - August 2003
 
I agree with the growth criteria being subjective. I have grown many morphs of zoas and palys over the years and I must also agree that is depends on many variables but one is key which I will mention later.

I remember when I fed my nightmare colony it exploded with new polyps (I no longer feed them...too lazy and no time with teaching). Before I had a chiller I would also notice different growth in my tank with seasonal changes with winter having "faster" growth (temp was usually around 82F with the heater). During summer the temp would swing several degrees daily and the growth slowed. Now here is another variable which I can not accurately answer since I do not recall but during the summer I would also buy more corals and move things around in my tank. In other words I had my hands in the tank more often during this period.

Since I now have a chiller I noticed a "steady" growth rate but I just let everything grow now and rarely go in the tank. I still notice differences with growth amongst the different morphs with the same par/fow/nutrients. This leads me to believe certain morphs/strains do have a tendency to spread faster but even the slower ones still spread and there are always exceptions. Going back to the main variable I believe contributes the most for fast/slow growth is STABILITY which not only includes water chemistry/flow/light but also as mentioned earlier in previous post to leave them alone. This is where growth becomes subjective since everyone has a different routine and expectations. Ah you know what I have learned this whole time honestly? JUST BE HAPPY IT HASN'T MELTED ON YOU :lol:.
 
Does anyone else have an opinion? Anyone?


Mooch

Hi MUCHO!

There is one more observation to consider here. This thread is about growth rates and I was focusing directly on that (growth/reproduction of zoanthids) when I answered with my thoughts about the subject.

Well, after reading the last posts... I do have to point that if the original question/pool was essentially towards those marketing "fast/slow growing" cartoon names, the answer would be NO, of course. Just because those are just "last names" of the "cartoon first names", as you've pointed out. Agreed!!

I personally think that the discussion would be great if related to possibilities of better growth/reproduction rates instead focusing on the " cartoon names" and the crazy market $$$tuff that we see nowadays. Not saying that it was mainly for the cartoon names, bust bringing that up.

And yes!!! We're younger than that, my friend!! LOL!:D

Just couple more pennies into the bowl...

Good reading!!
Thanks! :thumbsup:

Please keep it rolling... :bounce1::bounce2::bounce3:

Grandis.
 
It is indeed about growth, growth rate, reproductive rate, whatever you want to call it, it really doesn't matter Grandis. I simply used the names to help support my opinion on the topic. If you remove the names and titles I'd still have the same belief. I have seen these claims long before the advent of names in 2004/2005 and have also witnessed them recently even without a name being attached, so it doesn't matter. I'm simply referencing the claims of expectant growth rate. Regardless of what it is, what you want to call it or how it is labeled.....and based upon many who have replied inculding yourself earlier, said growth and rate of anything is based solely upon tank conditions and not by virtue of who and what it is.

I didn't want to post all the threads I have found here and on other forums and trust me there are many, but I'll share just one. Again, if you do a search on the description, a picture or a name of anything, you as well will find a thread that states my ___________ never grow and another that says the exact same _____________ grows like weeds on steroids in their tank.

http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2223468&highlight=fast+growing

I think Kafuadfish also makes a great point that I'm hoping he'd expound upon regarding RNA relative to growth rate.

This thread is not about who is right or wrong, we will all believe what we wish and I think engaging the topic is all I was looking to do really. I really wish others would do that also. Tell us what you feel growth, growth rate and the variables you agree or disagree with that contribute to it or even the ones you feel are important or not. Or gives us your own spin on this topic which may be completely different than anything posted thus far. :thumbsup:


Thanks again everyone.


MUCHO REEF
TOTM - August 2003
 
Last edited:
Man no one told me there was going to be homework.

I will have to find the article again so it may be a few.
 
Man no one told me there was going to be homework.

I will have to find the article again so it may be a few.





LOL, that's because you dah man. We can all learn from your experiences. Take it as another feather in your cap my friend. Now go ahead and drop that knowledge on us will yah.:wavehand:

I have some info on it but didn't want to steal your limelight so I will sit on it. Take your time, start a new thread so everyone can see it since no one is responding to this thread :confused:


By the way, here's another great thread for everyone to read from Reef Bass who hits the nail square on the head. Check it out everyone.

http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1975481&highlight=what+factors+impact


MUCHO REEF
TOTM - August 2003
 


Jarred, I hear you. But if that is the true reason, I would simply think that is amazing, wow.


MUCHO REEF
 
My dog at my homework!

I looked for it the other day at work and was unable to find it but I will look again next week when there is nothing to do.
 
Back
Top