xJake
Active member
I made some comments on thread in another thread, and I was asked to post them here.
This was my original post in that thread, regarding feeding, along with several replies.
quote:Originally posted by capn_hylinur
a great list Jake
this thread also has a great introduction on what and how to feed nutritionally
It was also written by a biologist--you guys are handy to have around
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/s...25&pagenumber=1
I don't agree with a lot of what he has posted in that thread. The following jumped out at me, forcing me to question his credibility:
quote:
No matter the types of foods you use, you must use some supplements. Your fish are caged. They can't seek out the tidbits that provide those trace compounds (e.g., vitamins and fats) they need to round out their optimal health. Fish can't produce all the vitamins and fats they need to live. So, you have to provide it.
If you provide your fish with a varied diet containing items that they would feed on in nature, then you don't need to supplement your foods for "optimal health." Just the simple fact that he states "No matter the types of foods you use..." should make you question the accuracy of his claims. He provides absolutely no evidence to support his claims, so unless I see a comprehensive study that even comes close to supporting this statement then I won't believe it.
quote:To a small degree the health of our fish depend upon obtaining some nutrients directly from the water they swim in. They need and use trace elements found in their water environment. Where we fail them sometimes is keeping them long term in water that doesn't contain these elements or contains these elements in concentrations too low for them.
The use of synthetic sea salts and saltwater mixes isn't the problem. The problem is sometimes we aquarists 'over clean' the water. The worst offender is activated carbon. Activated carbon removes organics the first week it is put into our system. After that it removes trace elements (and sometimes adds phosphates). It's the removal of trace elements we need to be watchful for. I've had long-term success with using carbon or carbon-like substances every other week and each time no more than 5-7 days, then removing it from the system to prevent the abnormal depletion of trace elements.
Adding small quantities of trace elements to a fish only aquarium is recommended.
In addition, for this reason (if not for the many other reasons) make sure you perform regular water changes (10% per week; 25% every three-four weeks; or more often).
Again, his claims seem rather sketchy. He doesn't support them with any credible sources, and I've never heard of a fish being able to directly absorb elements (or anything, except water, for that matter) from the water column, so this sounds extremely far-fetched to me.
Also, I've never heard of a fish's health being negatively affected by a "lack of trace elements" in the water column due to overusing activated carbon. Commercially produced flakes and pellets designed for ornamental marine fish provide virtually every major and minor element that a fish needs for "optimal" health.
Feeding a varied diet that is appropriate for your individual animals is enough to maintain their "optimal" health. If I were to be worried about a lack of trace elements negatively effecting ANYTHING in my tank, the first thing I would consider is my corals - NOT my fish. It just doesn't make sense to me.
Most of his "suggestions" and ideas (which he seems to be stating as "fact") seem to be supported only by speculation and his own hypotheses, and it doesn't seem very accurate to me. I'm sure he meant well, but I just don't buy into most of his claims.
This was my original post in that thread, regarding feeding, along with several replies.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14962826#post14962826 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by xJake
Basically, I feed w/e is available in our lab or w/e live food culture I have ready to feed out.
The list includes:
Frozen/Refigerated Foods:
Raw "Cocktail" Shrimp (chopped)
Raw Whitefish (Cod or Pollock) (chopped)
Raw Squid (chopped)
Silversides (chopped)
Raw Muscles or Clams (or w/e bivalve we have in stock) (shucked and chopped)
Jumbo Krill
Baby Krill
PE Mysis
Hikari Mysis
Cyclop-eeze
Blood Worms
Daphnia
Brine Shrimp
Baby Brine Shrimp
Spirulina Enriched Brine Shrimp
Herbivorous "grazing" foods (provides limited nutritional value, but allows for behavioral enrichment for grazing animals):
Blanched Chinese Cabbage (Bok Choy)
Blanched Romaine Lettuce
Blanched Spinach
Blanched Iceberg Lettuce (only occasionally, usually as a last resort; almost no nutritional value - cellulose and water are the two main components)
Blanched Collard/Mustard Greens
I simply "blanch" the greens in the microwave by wetting the leaves with water and then heating them for a few seconds just to soften everything. I'll usually do this in a plastic bag or another partially-sealed container.
Live Foods:
Mysid (Mysidopsis bahia)
Baby Brine Shrimp
Rotifers
Phytoplankton (only occasionally; about twice a month)
Various Marine Macroalgae/seaweed (we will occasionally have leftovers from research projects and classes where it was needed; it is kept refrigerated)
Cultured Caulerpa, Ulva, and Chaetomorpha Macroalgae (to those fish who will eat them)
Freeze-Dried/Dried Foods:
Raw "Sun-dried" Nori (un-toasted) (ordered in bulk wholesale packages)
Pellets and Flakes (only occasionally)
Jumbo Krill
Blood worms
Cyclop-eeze
Daphnia
Baby Shrimp (Sun-dried Gammarus Shrimp; Tetra-brand)
Red, Brown, Purple, and Green Dried Marine Algae (TLF-brand mostly, but sometimes SFB-brand)
We have a few dozen types of HUFA, and Vitamin supplements, but I don't normally use them for feeding the reef systems.
These supplements include:
Garlic Guard
Vitachem
Super Selco
Selcon
Zoecon
Various Vitamin tablets and pastes for certain animals and for animal research purposes (the only one that specifically comes to mind is a shark/ray nutritional supplement)
etc. (chances are if it exists then we have a bottle of it somewhere)
We also feed gelatin-based mixes. You can buy commercially manufactured mixes (herbivorous, carnivorous, or omnivorous blends) and then simply add hot water and refrigerate or freeze (then thaw; obviously). These are great for feeding doses of internal medications as they can be blended right into a whatever amount of food the animal will eat in a day/week. Then the animal receives the correct dosage when fed the correct amount of the medication-laced food. Also, the gelatin creates a much more rubbery/meat-like texture, which I assume is more appealing to most animals than hard/crunchy/dry pellets or flakes.
Basically, you can pretty much feed w/e you'd like or w/e is most available and affordable. Most of the meaty foods contain the same basic nutritional profile, and most herbivores (notably your Yellow Tang) will eat the dried marine algae that I mentioned above.
quote:Originally posted by capn_hylinur
a great list Jake
this thread also has a great introduction on what and how to feed nutritionally
It was also written by a biologist--you guys are handy to have around
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/s...25&pagenumber=1
I don't agree with a lot of what he has posted in that thread. The following jumped out at me, forcing me to question his credibility:
quote:
No matter the types of foods you use, you must use some supplements. Your fish are caged. They can't seek out the tidbits that provide those trace compounds (e.g., vitamins and fats) they need to round out their optimal health. Fish can't produce all the vitamins and fats they need to live. So, you have to provide it.
If you provide your fish with a varied diet containing items that they would feed on in nature, then you don't need to supplement your foods for "optimal health." Just the simple fact that he states "No matter the types of foods you use..." should make you question the accuracy of his claims. He provides absolutely no evidence to support his claims, so unless I see a comprehensive study that even comes close to supporting this statement then I won't believe it.
quote:To a small degree the health of our fish depend upon obtaining some nutrients directly from the water they swim in. They need and use trace elements found in their water environment. Where we fail them sometimes is keeping them long term in water that doesn't contain these elements or contains these elements in concentrations too low for them.
The use of synthetic sea salts and saltwater mixes isn't the problem. The problem is sometimes we aquarists 'over clean' the water. The worst offender is activated carbon. Activated carbon removes organics the first week it is put into our system. After that it removes trace elements (and sometimes adds phosphates). It's the removal of trace elements we need to be watchful for. I've had long-term success with using carbon or carbon-like substances every other week and each time no more than 5-7 days, then removing it from the system to prevent the abnormal depletion of trace elements.
Adding small quantities of trace elements to a fish only aquarium is recommended.
In addition, for this reason (if not for the many other reasons) make sure you perform regular water changes (10% per week; 25% every three-four weeks; or more often).
Again, his claims seem rather sketchy. He doesn't support them with any credible sources, and I've never heard of a fish being able to directly absorb elements (or anything, except water, for that matter) from the water column, so this sounds extremely far-fetched to me.
Also, I've never heard of a fish's health being negatively affected by a "lack of trace elements" in the water column due to overusing activated carbon. Commercially produced flakes and pellets designed for ornamental marine fish provide virtually every major and minor element that a fish needs for "optimal" health.
Feeding a varied diet that is appropriate for your individual animals is enough to maintain their "optimal" health. If I were to be worried about a lack of trace elements negatively effecting ANYTHING in my tank, the first thing I would consider is my corals - NOT my fish. It just doesn't make sense to me.
Most of his "suggestions" and ideas (which he seems to be stating as "fact") seem to be supported only by speculation and his own hypotheses, and it doesn't seem very accurate to me. I'm sure he meant well, but I just don't buy into most of his claims.