Flake Food Only?

goldmullet

New member
Hey,

I was talking to a lady who services fish tanks and she was saying on a couple of her tanks, she has automatic feeders set up cause the owners dont want to feed the fish.

And in the tank she has tangs, triggers etc. So she goes by every 2 weeks and refills the feeders with dry food and all the fish are healthy and happy. She says on one tank she has done this for over 7 years.

Is it true that these kinds of fish can live on only dry food?
 
I have heard that some people use NLS pellets exclusively. I cannot say if this is a good thing, but NLS is an excellent food and I do use it as one of the foods I feed.
 
NLS also makes flake food, which should be pretty good. As to the original question, there doesn't seem to be any reason fish couldn't thrive on a flake only diet if it was a good quality food and selected to meet the needs of the fish in the tank (e.g., with lots of greens for tanks with tangs). It seems to be preferable to offer many different types of food to provide the broadest nutrition, but good flakes could suffice.
 
So I could set up my tank on all automatic feeders and only have to swap out food every 2 weeks? I have a new 240 galloon by the way. Fish only.
 
I have done this for the last 6-7 months and it works. I don't feed it exclusively anymore because some angels/tangs/finicky eaters will not eat pellets for the first few months. So right now, I'm missing in NLS pellets and frozen together.
 
I feed NLS pellets 99% of the time. I'd say my fish get frozen food once a month if any. My regal angel and potters angel have been with me for years, and their growth and coloration is spectacular.
 
I'm old school, I feed good foods, but can't imagine feeding anything exclusively, especially flakes---there's too much waste
 
I have heard that some people use NLS pellets exclusively. I cannot say if this is a good thing, but NLS is an excellent food and I do use it as one of the foods I feed.

I'm one of those; at least nearly exclusively. I feed mysis and nori as treats. I've had 2 of my fish for 4 years, when I set up my tank, that have been on the 99% NLS diet and they are fat, colorful and healthy. I typically feed 3 times daily. I don't feed Thera A, just the "standard" pellets.

That being said a lot of aquarists who have much more experience than I feed a variety of foods daily.

Also, I wouldn't trust an automatic feeder. I'd rather take the 30 seconds to feed them myself.
 
I think it's very difficult to tell long term what type of impact/result on our fish if fed exclusively on a particular type of food especially not many manage to keep fishes over 5 or 10 years. If we feed children pizza or burgers exclusively they will look pretty good too.

If we can vary diet why wouldn't we want to give it to our fish? I think if we offer a variety the chance is higher that we miss less of the essential vitamins they require. If people don't like to bother with feeding their fish why have them? Personally feed time is a joy especially on homemade food. Just my 2 cents.
 
I would personally use NLS pellets as a staple, not flake, for many of the reasons mentioned already. But I also agree to adding a wide variety of frozen foods in addition, not just instead.
 
I sure haven't looked at the science behind NLS foods, I do know its a good staple food for lots of fish. But triggers & tangs eating the same food for a lifetime just doesn't add up. Either the triggers miss the protein they need or the tangs miss the bulk. I know some tangs can live off a good reef tank without ever being fed, feeding on algae & tiny crustaceans, but that is a rare exception. Packing everything carnivores, omnivores, and herbivores into a compact pellet? Maybe, but I'm very skeptical. If this stuff really provides for long term nutrition; maybe the same science should should be extended to human survival rations and 3rd world emergency aid.
 
3rd world emergency aid.

This may sound snarky, but it isn't intended too... Isn't the bulk of human nutrition covered by rice and beans? I'm not saying its the best diet ever, I just remember learning in school (been a long time since I was in school, so it could just be mixed memory) that the bulk of what you actually "need" is taken care of in rice and beans.
 
29/30*100=96%

LOL, ok you got me.

As for equating this to 3rd world rations... The same could be argued for cat and dog food. All I know is I raised an juvie Emperor angel into adult, and have kept two finicky angel species(Potters and Regal) fat and thriving for years with a diet that is 99%...err...96% NLS. My pair of Solomon Percula's spawn like clockwork as well. I'm sure they get additional nutrition from grazing my reef tank, and I may not have had the same success in a FO tank. I don't mean to sound like a NLS endorsement. I imagine I could get the same result with any high quality pellet food. However, I have only used NLS for the last few years. Therefore, I can only state that NLS works for me in this situation.

By all means, I will not dispute that a varied diet is best. But the OP asked if it is possible to keep marine fish happy on just dry food. And I say yes.

4874302025_7bcc747261_z.jpg

4832218462_9a2f3b41fd_z.jpg
 
Last edited:
Almost all food aid we send to the 3rd World is rice, beans, or grain. Unfortunately, most of it is stolen before it reaches the truly needy.
Beautiful Angels, as you said, I suspect their ability to gaze has a lot to do with their success.

As to cats & dogs; that's apples and oranges when comparing nutritional needs to fish. All domestic dogs are the same species, Canis lupus and subspecies familiarus; or something close. ( except schnauzers, which are Canis yappus). They are all the same (sub) species, so have the same basic nutritional needs. Tangs and triggers aren't even the same genus; probably as far apart as dogs and goats. I like NLS pellets and have never heard anything negative; my (possibly flawed) logic just says ''not one food for all fish, all the time".
 
Last edited:
Back
Top