Samala
New member
Now, I am all for enriching foods for larvae, fry, juveniles, finicky fish, sick fish.. you name it and I've probably enriched some food for it. But, after looking at the label of one of my enrichments, I am not so sure I want to be using this particular product anymore.
Kent Marine's Zoecon, which is 'nitrate and phosphate free, yeast and sugar free' is not exactly the most ecologicaly sound choice in the world of enrichments. For its omega 3/6/9 source it lists shark liver oil.
Last I checked shark populations world wide were not in such a grand state (after finning for soup, targeted by tournaments or being caught for fish n chips after codfishes demise) that we should be using their livers to round out our reef fishes' dietary needs.
Now, I can hear the argument that, if we're going to kill sharks for their meat/fins we could at least use all the organs - ie. shark liver oil for reefers, shark cartilage for the holistic medicine bunch, teeth for the tourist trinket trade, etc.
But, what a sad and lifeless argument that makes. Any demand for any shark product increases a caught sharks' 'value' to watermen who would otherwise choose another fishery, right?
I just feel that there has got to be another way for Kent Marine to turn out an enrichment product that does not do such a disservice to the oceans. Agree or disagree?
Now, what about the other enrichment sources.. what is Selco/Selcon made out of? Anyone know? Are there any 'green' enrichment sources other than garlic, spirulina, astaxanthin, flax seed oil and using live phyto strains through gut loaded live food?
I'm hoping to spark some intelligent discussion and see what is the best enrichment for me to be using to beef up omega 3/6/9's in my fishes food without using the dreaded shark liver oil. (I would also like to avoid using fish products from fishery's that are unstable or poorly managed, like cod, or cod liver oil.)
>Sarah
Kent Marine's Zoecon, which is 'nitrate and phosphate free, yeast and sugar free' is not exactly the most ecologicaly sound choice in the world of enrichments. For its omega 3/6/9 source it lists shark liver oil.
Last I checked shark populations world wide were not in such a grand state (after finning for soup, targeted by tournaments or being caught for fish n chips after codfishes demise) that we should be using their livers to round out our reef fishes' dietary needs.
Now, I can hear the argument that, if we're going to kill sharks for their meat/fins we could at least use all the organs - ie. shark liver oil for reefers, shark cartilage for the holistic medicine bunch, teeth for the tourist trinket trade, etc.
But, what a sad and lifeless argument that makes. Any demand for any shark product increases a caught sharks' 'value' to watermen who would otherwise choose another fishery, right?
I just feel that there has got to be another way for Kent Marine to turn out an enrichment product that does not do such a disservice to the oceans. Agree or disagree?
Now, what about the other enrichment sources.. what is Selco/Selcon made out of? Anyone know? Are there any 'green' enrichment sources other than garlic, spirulina, astaxanthin, flax seed oil and using live phyto strains through gut loaded live food?
I'm hoping to spark some intelligent discussion and see what is the best enrichment for me to be using to beef up omega 3/6/9's in my fishes food without using the dreaded shark liver oil. (I would also like to avoid using fish products from fishery's that are unstable or poorly managed, like cod, or cod liver oil.)
>Sarah