ReefEnabler
Premium Member
Hi Randy,
I was just going over your article on Refractometers and Salinity measurement.
I got confused by the whole salt vs seawater refractometer reading, and some numbers reported in a data table for % NaCl to reach various refractive index and PPT values.
Are you saying that a SALT refracometer would actually measure 35ppt using the 3.5% NaCl solution, and would be 1.7ppt off when testing a NSW sample, and vice versa (ie, SEAwater refractometer is accurate with NSW, and 1.7ppt off when testing 3.5% NaCl solution)????????????????? Or would any refrac
Basically, whats the different between a salt and seawater refractometer that would lead to different readings? Wouldn't they both suffer innacuracy testing 3.5% NaCl since they can only read refraction, not ppt (even if the results are on a ppt scale).
Would anybody happen to know if the Sybon refractometers are true seawater refractometers? I'm guessing no....
Then in this table slightly different information is provided:
In this table the 35ppt solution is 3.65% NaCl.
Why is the information different? Are the PPT values simply corrected to match NSW at the given Refractive Indices?
I am able to find some 35ppt NaCl solutions, like this one from DIY reef: https://diyreef.authsecure.com/shop/product_info.php?products_id=36
But how do I know if that is a solution thats 3.5% or 3.65% NaCl??
Thanks for clearing up any confusion!
Ryan
I was just going over your article on Refractometers and Salinity measurement.
I got confused by the whole salt vs seawater refractometer reading, and some numbers reported in a data table for % NaCl to reach various refractive index and PPT values.
... These are often called salt or brine refractometers. Despite the scale reading in ppt (‰) or specific gravity, they are not intended to be used for seawater. Unfortunately, many refractometers used by aquarists fall into this category. In fact, very few refractometers used by hobbyists are true seawater refractometers.
Fortunately for aquarists, the differences between a salt refractometer and a seawater refractometer are not too large. A 35 ppt sodium chloride solution (3.5 weight percent sodium chloride in water) has the same refractive index as a 33.3 ppt seawater solution, so the error in using a perfectly calibrated salt refractometer is about 1.7 ppt, or 5% of the total salinity.
Are you saying that a SALT refracometer would actually measure 35ppt using the 3.5% NaCl solution, and would be 1.7ppt off when testing a NSW sample, and vice versa (ie, SEAwater refractometer is accurate with NSW, and 1.7ppt off when testing 3.5% NaCl solution)????????????????? Or would any refrac
Basically, whats the different between a salt and seawater refractometer that would lead to different readings? Wouldn't they both suffer innacuracy testing 3.5% NaCl since they can only read refraction, not ppt (even if the results are on a ppt scale).
Would anybody happen to know if the Sybon refractometers are true seawater refractometers? I'm guessing no....
Then in this table slightly different information is provided:
NaCl (weight %)---------Refractive Index---------------(ppt)
3.3-------------------------1.3388-------------------------31.65
3.4-------------------------1.3390-------------------------32.8
3.5-------------------------1.3391-------------------------33.3
3.6-------------------------1.3393-------------------------34.4
3.65------------------------1.3394-------------------------35.0
3.7-------------------------1.3395-------------------------35.6
3.8-------------------------1.3397-------------------------36.7
In this table the 35ppt solution is 3.65% NaCl.
Why is the information different? Are the PPT values simply corrected to match NSW at the given Refractive Indices?
I am able to find some 35ppt NaCl solutions, like this one from DIY reef: https://diyreef.authsecure.com/shop/product_info.php?products_id=36
But how do I know if that is a solution thats 3.5% or 3.65% NaCl??
Thanks for clearing up any confusion!
Ryan