GIRS Members-Please read

Coralfreak

Premium Member
Hi Everyone,

The Board has been discussing some changes to some of the structure of the club and has come up with a plan that will, we believe, make things run a little smoother and more importantly, keep some of the politics out and put the fun back in. Lets face it, being a part of a club like this should be fun, it shouldn't feel like work.

With that said, we aren't going to have local "Trustees" per say, instead we would like to form a "Local Events Committee". While this may seem a big change, it was a unanimous decision by the current board. Their are several advantages to this. Even though the BOD will be smaller, it will increase communication between Board members and will make it much easier to get things done. It is also our hope that since their is not as much obligation to being on the Committee, that more members will participate. As you are all aware, all of these positions are voluntary, even so they can get somewhat stressful at times, hopefully this will take some of that away as well, again it should be fun not work. Of course, their is some work involved in this, the idea here is to delegate that out some. The Board will work on the getting speakers, setting up the frag auction etc, while the Local Events Committee can work on setting up some local activities.

The next thing is to look for some volunteers to be on the committee. The only real requirement is that you be a current member of the GIRS. As far as what is to be expected as a committee member, when the club plans an event in your area, we would like to count on you to help us out some in getting things setup. Other than that, we would ask that you work together as a team to set up some activities in the various areas a few times during the year. This could be a local tank tour, BBQ at someone's house, or whatever.

What we would like to find is at least one volunteer from Des Moines, Iowa City/Cedar Rapids, Waterloo and Davenport. If more than one member is interested in one area, that's ok as well.

I know their will be some questions regarding this change, feel free to ask any questions and myself or one of the other board members will get back to you.

Allen
 
Allen:

1. Is the GIRS members list u-pdated on the GIRS website? If so ca we nominate people?

2. What other structural changes or is this just it. Removign the Trustees and going with a local area group sounds great - but I am also assumign we will still have an overall leader - correct?

3 - Thank you for all your work and all the work of everyone who is in a leadership role for GIRS
 
1. Is the GIRS members list u-pdated on the GIRS website? If so ca we nominate people?

I believe the members list is fairly up to date. Well, we'd like to see members sort of volunteer, but I suppose it would be fine to nominate or suggest someone for a spot on the Committee. Just like the elected spots, you can either accept or decline.

2. What other structural changes or is this just it. Removign the Trustees and going with a local area group sounds great - but I am also assumign we will still have an overall leader - correct?

No other changes, its myself, Jason, Jeremy and Brad. We are just trying a different approach to the idea of having local meetings.

Allen
 
Well I'm always willing to help out wherever the need may be so you can count me in. I will gladly do my part and help the club out!

Thanks again guys for the hard work you've done so far and more importantly the work ahead of you!

Matt
 
Matt I was going to nominate you for the loo/falls area if Jason wasn't able to do it with being the vice and all. If you ever need help just ask.
 
Allen

What is the idea of shrinking the board of directors going to do to the ability of the very few board members left to hold events, plan the frag auction, etc?

Will this not require a further burden on the directors left and possibly negatively impact the ability of the club to have functions into the future as well as make the board position more like work to those who have them?



Billy
 
Billy,

The reason behind shrinking the main Board really comes down to communication, a smaller group can communicate with each other much better than a larger one.

One of the challenges to this club has always been how far we are spread apart across the state. With this committee, and others to come, we can delegate out the work much better. And yes, the board will have the job of arranging speakers etc, but what you want to keep in mind is that committees are not completely seperate entities from the Board, they are just an extension of it. We have an event in say Davenport, we will look to committee members there to help out etc. We could also, and most likely will, form a committee to help with the frag auction. The idea is to get everyone more involved in the club. I dont believe it will place an additional burden on the board.

Allen
 
Something I wanted to bring up, and this is only a suggestion.

I have had a chance to see the behind the scenes of a larger volunteer group. Mainly the Mississippi Valley Blues Society http://www.mvbs.org/. My dad is a board member. Their a non-profit all volunteer group but the put on a 3 day show with a budget of over $300,000.

One thing they do that I like is they have their elections in their slow time of the year. Mainly the majority of the work is done in June and July and then they have there elections in September. The advantage to this is that the incoming new leadership has a chance to get use to there duties and the have a whole year to set up new events.

We don't put on a $300,00 show but I think it would be to our advantage to considering moving the GIRS elections to the slow part of the year, the summer. Basically when its nice outside and no one wants to do anything with their tanks. To me the winter is prime time for indoor hobby stuff. We have the elections at the end of November and it dumps the new club business on the new board. Also summer elections would give the incoming board a chance to plan out ahead their new year. I am sure the big name authors scheudule their travels well in advance and I believe that the summer elections would make it easy to scheudule.

Just a thought what do you guys think?
 
Allen

Thanks for the information. I do appreciate your response.

One other area I have concerns about are how the club events will be scheduled. If the entire BOD is from one relatively small area, as is the case now I believe, that their will not be adequate input from the more outlying areas as to scheduling the frag auctions, speakers, and etc.

What I am getting at, is that I would hate to see this become a local club, instead of the Greater Iowa club. I see you point in a smaller board being better able to communicate, but I can also see the contingency of the board being a tight nit group that schedules events around their own schedules/needs, instead of the needs of the whole.

Billy
 
Actually the BOD is pretty spread out with the exception of Jason and Jeremy, they both live around the W-loo area, but Allen lives down in southern Iowa (oskaloosa) and I believe Brad lives in Ames???
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8680459#post8680459 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by got2lb
Actually the BOD is pretty spread out with the exception of Jason and Jeremy, they both live around the W-loo area, but Allen lives down in southern Iowa (oskaloosa) and I believe Brad lives in Ames???
The board, in terms of the state, is really not that widely distributed.
112294Snap1.jpg


I am just not one to see a massive reduction in the governing body of any organization. There gets to be too much control if just a few people run the organization and it is easy for people to get alienated from the group just because one person in the governing body doesn't like them.

And I am not saying that is what is happening, but, it is surely something that can happen in this situation. Better communication or not, I feel we are a more stable group with adequate representation from all areas.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8680549#post8680549 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by bgreenlee

I am just not one to see a massive reduction in the governing body of any organization. There gets to be too much control if just a few people run the organization and it is easy for people to get alienated from the group just because one person in the governing body doesn't like them.
And I am not saying that is what is happening, but, it is surely something that can happen in this situation. Better communication or not, I feel we are a more stable group with adequate representation from all areas.

I think the goal (and correct me if I am wrong here) is to have people from all areas step up to have smaller groups plan things locally ... Like the waterloo meeting (or is itt davenport??) anyhow the idea being that we in smaller local areas need to plan local happenings and the larger meetings are the BOD ....

I think things can get too complex if we over think them and - truthfully - as a group - people tend to get that way....

OBTW - I'll assist whomever wants to be the main POC in the Des Moines area..... just have a lot of time demands on me right now or I'd volunteer full time....
 
I think the goal (and correct me if I am wrong here) is to have people from all areas step up to have smaller groups plan things locally ... Like the waterloo meeting (or is itt davenport??) anyhow the idea being that we in smaller local areas need to plan local happenings and the larger meetings are the BOD ....

I think things can get too complex if we over think them and - truthfully - as a group - people tend to get that way....

Well said.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8680378#post8680378 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by bgreenlee
Allen

Thanks for the information. I do appreciate your response.

One other area I have concerns about are how the club events will be scheduled. If the entire BOD is from one relatively small area, as is the case now I believe, that their will not be adequate input from the more outlying areas as to scheduling the frag auctions, speakers, and etc.

What I am getting at, is that I would hate to see this become a local club, instead of the Greater Iowa club. I see you point in a smaller board being better able to communicate, but I can also see the contingency of the board being a tight nit group that schedules events around their own schedules/needs, instead of the needs of the whole.

Billy

Grrrrr Stupid RC lost my post
 
Time for me to say a few things.....

First off we down sized the BOD because of the lack of participation we had last year, it's easy to stand up and volunteer for the spot but it seems to be much harder to stand up when things need to get done. We struggled last year trying to communicate with 8 members, usually only recieving responses from 3 to 4. This is the reason for dropping the trustees


Secondly the location of the BOD has nothing to do with the clubs events for the year, it never has. The events are planned with much more than making us happy and accomodating our schedules. Some speakers need certain locations and so do certain events, it's not as easy as it looks to find locations that are cost effective, easy to find, and can hold all the members.

Thirdly, no offense but if there was a huge concern about the governing powers in the club why was nothing said when elections were going on? The trustees hold no real power on the BOD other than input and votes. They don't decide anything on speakers or frag auctions. If you feel that the club would be more stable with representatives in your area volunteer for the commitee
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8680648#post8680648 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by overanalyzer
I think the goal (and correct me if I am wrong here) is to have people from all areas step up to have smaller groups plan things locally ... Like the waterloo meeting (or is itt davenport??) anyhow the idea being that we in smaller local areas need to plan local happenings and the larger meetings are the BOD ....


It seems to me that the local groups have been planning events such as local tank tours and BBQ's.

My concern is the major events, such as speakers and the frag auction, will not have the full input of all the areas when it comes time to schedule it.

No matter how much a pain in the rear it is, the trustee's are really a necessary evil in my opinion. Them having the ability to bring the thoughts, ideas, and concerns to the regular meetings is imperative to have a well governed group.

I really feel that with this few people on the board we will not have all of the input that is needed to do what is ultimately the best for the entire group.
 
Back
Top