justnmatt79
New member
Mucho, agreed 100%.
The problem lies in the lack of true knowledge about these zoas. People call them LE, or rare or whatever, but they could all just be different variations of the exact same thing. Has anyone ever seen two A. ocellaris that looked identical? Some will have wider white stripes, some will have wider black lines, but they are still the same species. So a true Red Hornet and a Vivid Red Hornet may look different, but they may be the same thing. As of now, no one is qualified to answer that question.
I have seen Red Hornets. They looked different than what I see pictures of. Same as Rastas and any other named polyps. Because there is variation in every animal in existence. These corals may color up, or brown out in different environments, and thus will look different. So someone will buy some named polyp, and then it will change and adapt to their system, and BAM! A new named polyp has come into existence.
With macro photography, and photoshop, we are seeing all sorts of corals that look absolutely nothing like that to the naked eye. And that, to me, is what counts.
I do not have any dealing with Vivid, but from everything I have heard, they are an upstanding and respectable store. I take them at their word that they were not trying to deceive.
What is in a name? These are not scientific names, and are thus completely unofficial. Vivid stated exactly how unscientific this specific zoanthid was named. "Hey, lets call it this..." Some store in Arkansas may have the exact same polyp dubbed some other wacky name. So now that everyone knows that, they should ignore the names and buy what they like.
I do not condemn someone for buying something I deem to be priced outrageously. It is their money. I do not condemn someone for selling at prices I deem outrageous. The market will judge them. But I do not agree with this debate of names. It is convoluted. If any store can get a zoa in and slap a name on it, then that should be enough evidence that the zoanthid naming craze is just that, crazy.
The problem lies in the lack of true knowledge about these zoas. People call them LE, or rare or whatever, but they could all just be different variations of the exact same thing. Has anyone ever seen two A. ocellaris that looked identical? Some will have wider white stripes, some will have wider black lines, but they are still the same species. So a true Red Hornet and a Vivid Red Hornet may look different, but they may be the same thing. As of now, no one is qualified to answer that question.
I have seen Red Hornets. They looked different than what I see pictures of. Same as Rastas and any other named polyps. Because there is variation in every animal in existence. These corals may color up, or brown out in different environments, and thus will look different. So someone will buy some named polyp, and then it will change and adapt to their system, and BAM! A new named polyp has come into existence.
With macro photography, and photoshop, we are seeing all sorts of corals that look absolutely nothing like that to the naked eye. And that, to me, is what counts.
I do not have any dealing with Vivid, but from everything I have heard, they are an upstanding and respectable store. I take them at their word that they were not trying to deceive.
What is in a name? These are not scientific names, and are thus completely unofficial. Vivid stated exactly how unscientific this specific zoanthid was named. "Hey, lets call it this..." Some store in Arkansas may have the exact same polyp dubbed some other wacky name. So now that everyone knows that, they should ignore the names and buy what they like.
I do not condemn someone for buying something I deem to be priced outrageously. It is their money. I do not condemn someone for selling at prices I deem outrageous. The market will judge them. But I do not agree with this debate of names. It is convoluted. If any store can get a zoa in and slap a name on it, then that should be enough evidence that the zoanthid naming craze is just that, crazy.