<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6534817#post6534817 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by algaeguy
I am interested in your thoughts on the rubble as an efficient denitrification zone. I, too have thought about this, and I'm inclined to agree with you! I recall reading somewhere (Maybe in Sprung and Delbeek) about denitrification ocurring within the rock itself,
I agree that it may not be as efficient at denitrification as a DSB, but it may be a very viable alternative.
Scott
I doubt that the Rubble Bottom can out-perform a DSB, BUT, with some consideration of the "rubble" selection, it might come a lot closer than many people would think.
No amount of "depth" is going to affect denitrification significantly, because the amount of water around the rock will diffuse oxygen to levels that cannot support denitrification in the "interstital water". Interstital water is just the water between the rocks.
HOWEVER, If the rock selected, has a lot of surface area, like danieljames stated, that is a
very big PLUS ! Also, if rock that is very porous, is selected, that will also increase the denitrification capability TREMENDOUSLY.
A REALLY NICE FEATURE, here, is that Hydrogen Sulfide production, and heavy metals "sinking" would be NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE to occur ! ! ! ! !
Watta ya tinks of dem apples, heh ? ?
> Barry
