sarcophyton ehrenbergi is a good guess but i'd also guess s. flexuosum.
it seems to match pretty well imo to Verseveldt's (vague) description but i haven't yet seen Tixier-Durivault's 1966's description/drawing which he refers to though.
but i've found her descriptions show the coral in a more natural state (albeit only rough drawings) and closer to what we'd see with the living specimens than squashed and deformed preserved specimens that Verseveldt depends on. otoh, it being in french doesn't help me.
i'm also not 100% convinced of relying so heavily on spicule identification but that is what the professionals rely on (even in gross morphological differences).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.