wooden_reefer
New member
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15738994#post15738994 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jtrasap
Cycling, as we use the term in this hobby, is nothing more than bringing the bacteria up to a level that can remove the introduced waste. When you add a fish, you introduce more waste.
A large bio-load will obviously be diluted to a less toxic level, exponentially with increase in tank volume.
I don't think I should let this slide. This is important understanding on the science of nitrification.
What you are describing is true during cycling, not after cycling.
During cycling, the volume of the water dilutes ammonia and nitrite toxic to fish.
After cycling, ammonia and nitrite are both transcient chemical species in a tank. Their concentration should be virtual zero. The difference between dividing by 220 or 330 or 440 is still the same, near zero. If you need the volume dilution to ease the toxicity of ammonia and nitrite to fish, your tank is not cycled and the fish are in serious trouble. 550, 660 gals makes little difference. The nitrification capacity is all in the substrate. The amount, type of filter medium, the setup, and for a while the history and method of cycling, are what determine nitrification capacity and effectiveness, not the physical volume of a tank. Large fish need large tank, for the most part, for swimming room, not greater nitrification that comes with a larger tank.
Say if one uses damsels to cycle a tank (damsel in distress), the damsels will experience what you have described during cycling.
One does not need damsels to cycle a tank. You can just use artificial ammonia source and bacteria seed. Seed and waste method of cycling.
A cycle can be a weak one or a robust one. If at the end of the cycle the nitrification bacteria population is still low, the cycle is weak. Say if there has been one brief ammonia concentration of 0.5 ppm during the whole cycle, there will still be a cycle but a weak one.
If you provide high enough sources of ammonia and multiple times, say 3-5 ppm 3-5 times during the cycle, you will have a robust cycle resulting in very high nitrification bacteria population, which will be enough for all of most conceivable bioload all at once right after cycling. The bacteria population will likely decline in the months to come due to low bioload.
The seed and waste method of cycling is not to speed up any cycle but to make sure that after cycling the bacteria population is very high. Actually this method may well take a week or so longer for high ammonia and nitrite to drop to zero.
And, nitrification bacteria do not die quickly for lack of ammonia and nitrite. It takes weeks of no ammonia or nitrite for the such bacteria popluation to decline. The aquarist can take advantage of this fact.
Mini-cycling weeks after cycling is 100% preventable. One just has to make sure that one aims for a robust cycle.
Also, mini-cycling is also avoidable even a year or two after cycling. All one has to do is to prepare robustly cycled medium in advance of introduction of much greater bioload, and then add such mature filter material to the tank just before introduction of much higher bioload, best in the sump with return water dripping on such medium.
Mini-cycling is 100 percent avoiding in DT and almost 100% avoidable in QT (except when you have to use a drug that depresses nitrification).
In order to master practical application of nitrification, one has to really know the science well first.
I think the voodoo that mini-cycling is unavoidable is the legacy from "damsel in distress" cycling. Otherswise, how could such appalling myth continue?
Last edited: