how much brighter are the xte compared to the xpe anyways??
The best royal blue XP-E bin is rated minimum of 500 mW at 350mA and drops 3.2v. The best XT-E bin is rated minimum of 550 mW and drops 2.85v.
So, effectively, at a given
current the XT-E is about 10% better. But to get the real picture, you need to look at power levels, since as gpx mentioned the XT-E drops less voltage. The XP-E is doing ~446 mW/W while the XT-E is doing 551 mW/W. So it is roughly 20% more efficient.
The way this plays out in a build will depend on a few variables, but it basically means you can use 20% fewer LEDs at the same power level or you can use the same number of LEDs and run at 20% less power, etc.
Again though it's important to consider the
power you're running at, not the current. If you try to do the math based on current (i.e. switch from 10 XP-E at 700mA to 8 XT-E at 700mA) then you'll get less light than you think, since XT-E drop less voltage and hence run at a lower power for a given current level.
Another inherent advantage of these LEDs is that you can fit more on a given driver, since they drop less voltage. Regardless of how you work out LED count and power level, this can mean you need fewer drivers and are hence saving on upfront cost and longterm efficiency losses.