How to FEED your reef tank so that your corals will really GROW, instead of ho-hum...

Perfect Cape,

You know if everyone would really post the sources just like you did, then this board would be far less full of hearsay, and a much more powerful, and valuable tool. There would be so many fewer posts that start out ,"take this with a grain of salt", "I heard it somewhere but I can't remember" etc.

Cheers,
Aaron
 
"There are many things besides zooplankton which reefers can use to feed their corals, just like the ocean does. Some of the less-obvious ones (because they are invisible) are DOC and DOM. These are Dissolved Organic Carbon, and the larger category, Dissolved Organic Matter. The general definition of 'dissolved' is that it is a particle less than a half micron in size:"

"Encyclopedia of Earth:"

"Marine dissolved organic matter is a complex mixture of molecules of diverse origins found in seawater from throughout the world ocean. The concentrations of individual molecules are low, but there are tens of thousands of different molecules in seawater, and the volume of the world ocean is large, making this a major global reservoir of non-living organic matter. The total amount of marine dissolved organic matter is most commonly measured as the organic carbon in seawater that has passed through a filter with a pore size of about 0.5 microns to remove large particles and organisms."
.
.
.
.
"In-situ [in the ocean] release of mucus and DOC-lipid from the corals Acropora variabilis and Stylophora pistillata in different light regimes. Coral Reefs, July 1987:"

"Scleractinian corals release particulate and dissolved organic carbon (POC, DOC), of which a major constituent is mucus, an important component in coral reef trophodynamic [feeding] processes.
.
.
.
.
"Linkage of small-scale spatial variations in DOC, inorganic nutrients, and bacterioplankton growth, with different coral reef water types. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, March 2001:"

"Coral reefs are characterized by relatively high gross primary productivity [growth from the sun] sustained by the symbiosis between corals and symbiotic algae, and the large photosynthetically active area of reef surfaces, ample light, and inorganic carbon [CO2 etc]. Moreover, coral reefs are well known to trap [eat] particulate organic matter and nutrients from the overlying water. Nevertheless, the gross respiratory consumption [what reefs "give off"] in reef systems is approximately equal to the gross photosynthetic fixation [what reefs "take in"], and the net flux [movement] of organic matter is typically small. [meaning a reef recycles the DOC and DOM, just like an aquarium does]"

"It has been recognized that in coral reef waters, a flux [movement] of dissolved and particulate material [food] emanates from benthic [sea floor] algae and corals, and from the underlying sediment. Dissolved organic matter accumulates over coral reefs and in lagoons, compared to adjacent oceanic surface waters, indicating that in reef waters the production of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) exceeds the loss. Part of the gross primary production of corals is released as mucus, DOC, and DON [dissolved organic nitrogen]."

"In the mucus layer of stony corals, extremely active microbial communities have been found, compared to ambient water [the microbes eat the DOC/DOM]"

"The highest DOC concentrations of all reef water types were found in the Coral Surface. Live coral is apparently the main source of DOC in the reef structure. It is well known that corals allocate 50 percent of the gross primary production into mucus. DOC apparently emanates from the mucus layer of corals, into the Coral Surface and ambient water."

"The primary consumers of DOC are heterotrophic bacteria, which take up the bioavailable organic matter [and the bacteria then feed other corals]."
.
.
.
.
"Aspects of the biomass, feeding, and metabolism of common corals of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Proceedings of the Fourth international Coral Reef Symposium, 1982:"

"The opinion that corals with small polyps are more autotrophic [using the sun instead of food] as compared to corals which have large polyps seems to be incorrect."

"These data prove that dissolved organic matter (DOM) can be recognized as a real and important source of food. [...] The second important source of food for corals are planktonic bacteria which can cover 8-25 percent of [the corals'] respitory expenditures. The ingestion of bacteria occurs together with the ingestion of detrital aggregates and pseudo-plankton, captured with the aid of mucus filaments excreted by the coral's epithelium, and which are then swallowed by the polyps."

"The highest rates of predatory feeding [the eating of pods] were found in corals with small polyps like Acropora, Stylophora, and Pocillopora. [...] This means that these corals can cover daily respiration losses by purely predatory feeding at normal concentrations of zooplankton in the reef waters at night."
.
.
.
.
"On The Feeding Of Some Scleractinian Corals With Bacteria and Dissolved Organic Matter. Limnology and Oceanography, May 1973:"

"Polyps are believed to have additional sources of food, both particulate and dissolved."

"Feeding experiments were carried out with 6 species of common scleractinian reef-building corals from reefs of the Bismarck Archipelago. Their ability to utilize planktonic bacteria and dissolved organic matter as food was demonstrated."

"During [a boat cruise] in the western tropical Pacific, I had an opportunity to measure the assimilation of dissolved organic matter and phosphorus by coral polyps."

"Specimens of some of the common species of reef-building corals, including species of Montipora, Pocillopora, Porites, Pavonia, and Acropora were used in experiments carried out at field laboratories set up on islands in the St. Andrew reefs and at Ninigo atoll (Bismarck Archipelago)."

"Natural bacterioplankton, planktonic algae (maintained in culture), and dissolved organic matter (DOM) were labeled and used as food."

"The [amount] of assimilation of planktonic algae by corals was 10-20 times less than that for their feeding on bacterioplankton. Of the two kinds of algae tested, the mixture of flagellates (Platymonas) was utilized to a lesser extent than the flagellates Amphidinium samples. Some of the corals (e.g. Porites and Acropora) were virtually unable to feed on the algae tested. Montipora and Pocillopora can consume and digest algae to a limited extent."

"The mechanism of selective filtration by corals is based on their ability to change the direction of movement of their cilia under the influence of the type of particles present in the water. In the presence of edible particles, ciliary movement is directed to the mouth. In the presence of nonedible material, the movement reverses under the influence of chemo-reception so that this material is removed from the surface of the polyp's body."

"The relative amount of labeled metabolic CO2 evolved by corals during the relatively short second stage of the experiment was much higher when they were fed bacteria than when they were fed algae, showing that the assimilation of bacteria consumed is greater than that of algae."

"The experiments involving the feeding of corals with labeled dissolved organic matter revealed their ability to utilize it at very low concentrations [...], close to natural concentrations of low molecular-weight organic matter in neritic waters. Their intensity of feeding on DOM was even higher than on the equivalent amount of labeled bacterioplankton. The DOM consumed was quickly assimilated and incorporated, shown by the intensive evolution of labeled CO2 during the respiration of corals previously fed with DOM. The consumption of labeled DOM by corals was so high that a colony of 10-12 grams wet-weight consumed up to 50 percent of the initial DOM amount from 1 liter of water. These data indicate that under certain conditions, low molecular weight DOM can serve as one of the sources of food for corals, and possibly for other coelenterates having ciliary epithelium [hairs] increasing the contact surface."

"It is apparent that as well as phosphorus, the polyps and their symbiotic zooxanthellate can also receive other important nutrients, e.g. nitrogen, iron, or vitamin B12, as a result of feeding on bacteria. Therefore the ability of corals to filter feed, as well as their capacity for preying on planktonic organisms and for utilizing DOM, provides not only energy and organic matter for biosynthesis by the polyps but also provides the nutrient supply for photosynthesis of their symbiotic algae."


I found links!
http://www.eoearth.org/article/Marine_dissolved_organic_matter
http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=k317742p504rnw5p&size=largest
http://www.int-res.com/articles/ame/24/a024p017.pdf
http://www.reefbase.org/download/download.aspx?type=10&docid=9350 (needs free account)
http://www.aslo.org/lo/toc/vol_15/issue_4/0579.pdf
 

Attachments

  • Acropora variabilis.jpg
    Acropora variabilis.jpg
    16.4 KB · Views: 7
  • Stylophora pistillata.jpg
    Stylophora pistillata.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 7
  • Great Barrier Reef.jpg
    Great Barrier Reef.jpg
    11.9 KB · Views: 8
  • St. Andrew islands.jpg
    St. Andrew islands.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 9
  • Ninigo Atoll.jpg
    Ninigo Atoll.jpg
    6.2 KB · Views: 10
So is DOM something you can buy and put in?

Sure!!

It's called fish food. The fish eat the food and poop it out thus adding to the total dissolved organic matter. As bristle worms, hermits, snails, fish, corals, and every other living animal eats the various sources of food throughout the tank (the food you feed, the algae growing in the tank, detritus that settles on the rock, etc...) the waste that gets expelled is what primarily contributes to the total DOM. Decomposition of various organics also contributes, but in a reef system most waste and particulate matter gets eaten by something until it's broken down small enough to be considered DOM (a reef tank with proper diversity of micro and macrofauna is a well oiled recycling factory). Before it's DOM the larger particles are considered POM (particulate organic matter).

Jeremy

**EDIT/ADDITION****

Here's a good article by Randy about dissolved and particulate organics.
http://www.reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-10/rhf/index.php
 
Last edited:
I originally posted this in the chem forum but didn't get a response. My second choice is here since it deals with methods of feeding corals

"NPBioPellets replacing carbon dosing?
I was given this sheet on NPBioPellets from my supplier. apparently alot of reefers are using it in our area and getting good results. I am a little skeptic of what it says it can do and how it says it is doing it.

"the positive effects of NP-reducing Biopellets on alter quality are based on the principle of immobilization. Waster products from the water, mainly nitrate and phosphate, are converted into bacteria. This keeps the aquarium clean.

NP-reducing biopellets are composed of biologically degradable polymers that can be placed in a fluidized filter or filter canister. The pellets will allow aerobic growth of bacteria which consequently will consume nitrate and phosphate simultaneously. the bacteria will use up the carbon from the biopellets while nitrogen and phosphorus are taken from the water as nitrate and orthophosphate. this conversion or organic bio pellets into microbial biomass is called immobilization. In addition, anerobic layers will develop resulting in additional denitrification.
The surplus of bacteria will be consumed by filter and suspension feeding organisms such as sponges and corals or skimmed off by a protein skimmer. On average this "solid vodka method" takes 2-4 weeks to give rise to sufficient bacteria to allow nitrate and phosphate levels to drop. the main advantage of this method over using vodka or sugar as a carbon source is the NP reducing biopellets stimulate local growth of bacteria in a filter compartment, instead of all over in the aquarium where they may clog up pipes and hoses. they also prevent the growth of cynobacteria as the bacteria grown on the NP-reducing pellets will compete with these phototrophic nuisance microbes. finally NP-reducing pellets will save the aquarist a lot of time as no daily dosages of carbon are required"

It sounds like science fiction to me but I was asked to check it out----what do you guys think.
 
Capn', I cant' see anything in the bio-pellets claims that I would doubt.

Everything they seem to say (if somewhat over-adorned for publicity) is fairly true, so far as I can tell.


I've read that carbon-source dosing provides bacterial film (food) for corals and other animals. I know in my tank when i dose vodka or vitamin C in tandem with MB7, my nutrient levels remain very low but xenia and anthelia growth actually increase from a dead standstill to fairly prolific..... even as my coralline algae dies for lack of N and P.

Supposedly, as I'm told by a local coral farmer who owns a greenhouse, that some of these soft corals do consume, in some way, bacterial films or at least a by-product of these bacteria. From what I've seen in my tank, I have no reason to doubt it.
 
Where's that quote from Capn?? I'm interested to read all the info.

If they do as that quote says, then they would contribute to DOM or POM (based on the size of the bacteria). Sounds like there would be a significant release of bacterioplankton if the NP pellets were routinely stirred like what people do with zeolite reactors. Sounds like the NP bio pellets are nothing more than a solid form of a carbon source. Since carbon sources are a limiting bacterial proliferation nutrient in reef tanks then when you add these pellets and they slowly released a carbon source it could certainly add beneficial DOM and in turn decrease N and P at the same time.

I'm not familiar with the biopellets but I'd be interested to hear how they function and provide a slow release of or limited availability of a carbon source. It would be interesting to learn how the biopellets are able to provide a carbon source to the bacteria without releasing some of that carbon into the tank and contibute to the total organic load. If they significantly increase TOC's then they may do more harm than good. Kind of like a vodka, vinegar, or sugar overdose.

Jeremy
 
So is DOM something you can buy and put in?
DOM is something we usually strive to remove from a closed reef aquarium system ;)

cap- the biopellets are a relatively very expensive form of carbon dosing. They "work" as advertised but they're not a 'magical' solution for creating a successful reef aquarium.
 
DOM is something we usually strive to remove from a closed reef aquarium system ;)

cap- the biopellets are a relatively very expensive form of carbon dosing. They "work" as advertised but they're not a 'magical' solution for creating a successful reef aquarium.

I am a little confused here Gary----I thought the principal food for corals was dom as posted earlier on this thread.

I agree with you about the biopellets not being a magical solution for creating a successful reef.

My display tank

IMG00153-20100523-1717.jpg


is feed by these refugiums

IMG00165-20100523-1723.jpg


IMG00161-20100523-1721.jpg


I do not feed anything else to my tank. The bioload is also rather large--17 fish including 4 tangs so I imagine the corals get all the fish poop they need:lol2:
 
nice DT and 'fuge system!

nice DT and 'fuge system!

I am a little confused here Gary----I thought the principal food for corals was dom as posted earlier on this thread.
it depends on the types of corals.
I've never seen an Acropora chow down on a Tang turd. In fact- in my personal system I try to remove fish poop as quickly and efficiently as possible.
This allows me to grow more types of corals than if I allowed my system to run with high levels of dissolved organic matter.
 
Something that might be of note... bacteria that is floating in the water isn't always visible... and bacteria from a "Tang turd" starts to get dispersed into the water the second it comes out of the fish.
 
So it is okay to take the detritus laying on the bottom of my sump and feed it to my corals? Because, baby, I've got a lot of it, wouldn't want it to go to waste.


P.S.: Very informative article. Thank you for sharing.
 
So it is okay to take the detritus laying on the bottom of my sump and feed it to my corals? Because, baby, I've got a lot of it, wouldn't want it to go to waste.


P.S.: Very informative article. Thank you for sharing.


I think the general concensus is that 99% of reef tanks already have excessive amounts of DOC's. That's why we implement such expensive skimmers, ozonizers, GFO, GAC, etc.... for filtration. If you've got any significant amount of detritus accumulating I'd suggest siphoning it out.

Jeremy
 
Back
Top