Philosophos
New member
Sk8r, I would be surprised if there weren't studies on marine ich; any disease that can impact fish farming pops up as a subject of study. What I question is how many hobbyists actually read that study? The sticky from Snorvich may be very useful in treating the disease, but it definitely isn't sourced to any academic research. If it were, I would not suspect the average hobbyist would read the sourced material.
My comments regarding alternative answers were more about the option to be honest about what we don't know. At very least, regardless of personal belief, we should all be on the same page that faith isn't part of science. Offering only 'yes' or 'no' caters strictly to the absolute knowledge claim of faith; it is not scientific. Most of the time I wouldn't care, but in this case the OP brought the issue up almost immediately; it's a major topic within the thread.
My comments regarding alternative answers were more about the option to be honest about what we don't know. At very least, regardless of personal belief, we should all be on the same page that faith isn't part of science. Offering only 'yes' or 'no' caters strictly to the absolute knowledge claim of faith; it is not scientific. Most of the time I wouldn't care, but in this case the OP brought the issue up almost immediately; it's a major topic within the thread.