Kill-a-watt $14.99

Hey KDB you can borrow mine.
It's pretty much the unofficial MARS unit.
It's been to countless people in the club now...

LMK if you want to borrow it..
~Steve~
 
Wattage for most of our devices is available on the device's label and online.

Mag 9.5=93watts. A bit less than $10/month to run 24/7.
 
If you look at the label and assume it correct.
Thank again....

Just like Sanjay was showing us a 400W ballast and lamp "should" pull 400 watts right?

NOT SO, in some cases it was pulling like 600 watts.
They REALLY help you find out things about your equipment you did not know.
 
http://www.pumped101.com/

http://www.pumped101.com/efficiency.pdf

http://www.motorsanddrives.com/cowern/motorterms8.html

http://www.driedger.ca/ce1_cp/CE1_CP.html

So I searched and searched for some good recources that would explain your question about power and pumps that was easy to read and straight forward with all the information related to our application. So rather than type and type and type it all.....you can read, and read and read it all.

Here is the deal, and the key are pump curves and knowing where you lie on that curve. One of the most confusing and misunderstood things that people do when setting up thier tank are the return pumps. Most of the time, the mistakes we make are so minor, it doesn't matter, however when you get into larger flows and pressures and larger pumps the problems of a mismatched system are evident, and costly. This is why we get away with ignoring pump curves and buying the pumps FIRST rather than designing the system. Instead we go about it backwards and wonder why we have so many "problems" Pump selection should be based on the required flow, with a given and prededermined Total Dynamic Head, that is based on the plumbing design. Most problems occur when this is ignored for personal observations of others, based on what is usually a different setup than what you will have.

The key to pump selection is finding a pump that operates at it peak effeciency based on your system conditions. If not, the pump will not preform at its peak flow, pressure, which may vibrate or cavitate. The relations between these characteristics in pump applications such as ours are governed by the Affinity Laws as seen in one of the links. There is such a law that relates power used as discussed here, but there is nothing for free and the efficiencies and pump performances are changed.

It is true, throttling the suction does decrease the amperage draw, but this also shifts the duty point of the pump, creating a less efficient pump, which in turn can lessen flow or TDH. The main concern with suction throttling is it effect the Net Positive Suction Head and the increase possibility of cavitation, (another misdiagnosed reefer problem that is usually air entrainment instead), if the pump was already poorly matched with the system, this can only compound the system.

The Affinity laws also relate to impeller diameters, which I am suprised is not played with more in the hobby, by trimming or increasing the diameter of the impeller one can bring the system and pump curves in line to match the two, which in turn relates to Variable Frequency Drives that could be thought in regards to as "infinitly adjustable impellers". VFD's are cool because the shift the Best Efficiency point (BEP) of the pump.

Well, I didn't write "that" much.......lots going on though and may not be worth the pennies you may save in doing so.
 
Last edited:
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11908245#post11908245 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jtarmitage
Hey Gresham, what exactly do you do now? I see marine farmer, and everyone seems to know you, but being relatively new to the world of reef clubs, I can only guess.

Click on my little red house ^^^^^ :D
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11910203#post11910203 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by funman1
If you look at the label and assume it correct.
Thank again....

Just like Sanjay was showing us a 400W ballast and lamp "should" pull 400 watts right?

NOT SO, in some cases it was pulling like 600 watts.
They REALLY help you find out things about your equipment you did not know.

I think Sanjay was referring to a magnetic ballast. He was saying how the ballast was trying to provide the current the lamp was asking for when the lamp was old. In terms of electronic devices, magnetic ballasts are a very crude device.

I don't think an electronic ballast will allow for a current flow much beyond it's design. My IceCap 660 ballast label says it has a maximum line draw of 4.4 amps. I think accurate labeling is a requirement for UL listed devices.

It should be noted that there are losses in an electronic ballast (not nearly as much as in a magnetic ballast) and if 500 watts is going to the lamp there could be another 10+% in power used within the ballast because of how they function. Not that you can do anything about that anyway...

Aside from all that, using a killawatt meter, what devices have shown higher than rated current draw, and how much higher was the draw than the rating?
 
Warren,

Other uses for the Kilowatt is to determine the amount of energy usage on products that aren't on all the time or on at a preset amount of time. For example, heaters and chillers are not always on all the time, so using a kill-a-watt device is good. I also have used it on my refrigerator to see how much electricity it actually uses. The label on devices also does not show the spikes during startup. The kill-a-watt can be used to look for these spikes.

Last - I use the kill-a-watt for non-reef related items such as my computer and fridge. Just because I have a 200 watt power supply doesn't mean that I am always using 200 watt on my computer.

Steve - I used to have two of these devices. I loaned one out and can't remember who I loaned it to. Oh well....

Minh
 
Does the kill-a-watt show how much electricity your fridge uses during a period of time, like a day?

Once you have that information from the kill-a-watt, what do you do with that information?
 
I plan on starting a spreadsheet for aquarium devices I have on my soon to be 5 tanks. I'll post once I've had a chance to review the data.
 
Warren,

yes, the Kill-a-watt does show how much electricity you use over a period of time. The first time I used a kill-a-watt device was to determine how much electricity my old fridge was using. My old fridge was not very energy efficient. Using the number provided by the kill-a-watt, I determined that a new fridge would pay for itself in a few years (I can't remember the exact number). With that information, I purchased a new fridge.

I also used it on my computer system to determine how much it would cost to leave my computer on. We have also used the kill-a-watt at work to determine how much electricity some of our devices used in order to load balance our equipment over several circuit.

For some stuff, reading the UL label would be pretty accurate. For other devices, I would not trust the UL label for actual usage.

Minh

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11913622#post11913622 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by WarrenG
Does the kill-a-watt show how much electricity your fridge uses during a period of time, like a day?

Once you have that information from the kill-a-watt, what do you do with that information?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11914282#post11914282 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Reefugee
Warren,

yes, the Kill-a-watt does show how much electricity you use over a period of time. The first time I used a kill-a-watt device was to determine how much electricity my old fridge was using. My old fridge was not very energy efficient. Using the number provided by the kill-a-watt, I determined that a new fridge would pay for itself in a few years (I can't remember the exact number). With that information, I purchased a new fridge.

I also used it on my computer system to determine how much it would cost to leave my computer on. We have also used the kill-a-watt at work to determine how much electricity some of our devices used in order to load balance our equipment over several circuit.

Good stuff. My in-laws will not give up their old fridge. I should buy a kill-a-watt to show them what it's costing them.

So, to answer the age-old question, should we leave our home computers on overnight, and what's the cost of doing that?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11914374#post11914374 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by WarrenG
So, to answer the age-old question, should we leave our home computers on overnight, and what's the cost of doing that?

I just put a new motherboard in mine and upgraded to Vista. My PC goes into standby after 30 minutes and takes all of 20 seconds to come back on. I'm curious how much that is saving me.
 
I let my tower of power run 24/7
room2.jpg


I can't stand waiting 20 seconds for a machine to be up and running, when I sit down, I want it ready NOW.
I'm very impatient :)

Also I have my systems setup to run Virus Scans, defrags, and spyware scans late at night so it needs to be on for those.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11915855#post11915855 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by funman1
I let my tower of power run 24/7

I can't stand waiting 20 seconds for a machine to be up and running, when I sit down, I want it ready NOW.
I'm very impatient :)

Oh, I just timed the restart from sleep with Vista and 2gb ram. 4 seconds, and another 6 after I enter my password.
 
Back
Top