Large volume laminar flow machine

You can always use Shapeways to run a quick online quote. They will be using an SLA printer (Stratsys or similar). Cost will be..high.
 
Your CAD renderings are frickin' awesome! Bask in the nerdy goodness…

I'm still confused on the overall system configuration. Is it a separate test mule, or is it going to be incorporated into your current system? Can you explain (and/or render) the overall configuration? I would be grateful, and it may help others following/helping as well.
 
Your CAD renderings are frickin' awesome! Bask in the nerdy goodness"¦

I'm still confused on the overall system configuration. Is it a separate test mule, or is it going to be incorporated into your current system? Can you explain (and/or render) the overall configuration? I would be grateful, and it may help others following/helping as well.

There are 3 implementations:

1. This is the desired final system (48" x 120" x 24" high, DT = 36" x 96" x 24" high)
8_zpsaf0mgtp1.png


2. Retrofit current
My current system is smaller (DT = 32" x 96" x 28" high) and I'm not going to rip it apart. I'll take a couple of the 3D printed pieces and use it on my current system to create a more uniform flow pattern. It's not the ultimate purpose, but it's what I'll use in the short term.

3. Proof of concept
I've got my kids building up the Lego model now. It's the square edged version, but it's what I'll use to prove that the big final system will work as expected.
 
Cost will be high because it's Shapeways or because my design is hard to 3D print?


Sheer size and time required most likely. Straight vertical walls can be a bit harder to deal with on home printers (sagging and slumping), but shouldn't be an issue for a proper printer.
 
Size and time?

It's 16" x 6" x 3" and mostly air... If it's going to be expensive to do one, and I need two per section + two more for the inlet and transition, that's four. X 5 sections per side= 20 per side ... X 2 sides = 40! There's only 5 unique shapes though - the center section + right handed inlet and transition + left handed inlet and transition.

Maybe I need to create a transfer mould out of the five basic 3D pieces and then create multiples using a different technology.
 
Will your CAD system measure total volume of the walls. That might also help with the bidding process. If not, I could help.
 
16" x 6" is a fairly large printed piece. Also, 3d printing is slllooowwwww. But I'm speculating - I'd suggest just chucking the model into their system and see what it comes back with.
 
Last edited:
16" x 6" is a fairly large printed piece. Also, 3d printing is slllooowwwww. But I'm speculating - I'd suggest just chucking the model into their system and see what it comes back with.

Will do. I need to download the maker's CAD so I can convert it from sketchup
 
So.. On the idea of s transfer mould...

If I make an acrylic box for the 3D piece. Spray it with non-stick film and then pour in a hard wax (best material ?) to make a mould. Once it dries, take the 3D piece out, flip the wax mould over, spray with non-stick again and pour epoxy to make copies?

There are no hidden ledges or hooks. These are all straight vertical shapes, so mould transfer should work.

Would the right materials be wax and epoxy?
 
Ok. The volume of the main section is 40.3in3 = 660.4cm3 = 660g of ABS plastic
Here's the breakout:

16 x 0.4 (straight fins) = 6.5in3
8 x 0.6 (second fins) = 5.1
4 x 1.1 (third tier) = 4.2
2 x 2.1 (fourth) = 4.2
1 x 4.0 (main divider) = 4.0
2 x 2.7 (side walls) = 5.5
1 x 10.8 (base floor 1/8") = 10.8

The floor is 25% of the total and the fins contribute 75%.

So how much would 660g of ABS 3D printed cost?
 
The wax and epoxy can work but heat can be a VERY BIG ISSUE!

When my company didn’t listen to me, we lost thousands of dollars. LOL and then we had to literally run as smoke started shooting out of the molds like a small jet engines….Oh and more than once. Read the data sheets.

Just be sure that you get a very slow acting resin. You could also add multiple thin layers, allowing them to set before adding another.

…but if adding radii in the corners can be achieved, I hope that you will have a much better resulting output.
 
you mean instead of simulating a straight Tee, simulate a double 90

p327-015.jpg


It's a good idea, especially because I'm concerned about the returning flow impedance too - this is the flow from the thin comb structures back into the main duct for the pump intakes.
 
If you are going to be able to do sculpting of sorts, why don't you add splitters with radii on the other side as well?

Splitter.jpg

<a href="http://s1062.photobucket.com/user/karimwassef/media/0_zpsufcporwh.png.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1062.photobucket.com/albums/t496/karimwassef/0_zpsufcporwh.png" border="0" alt=" photo 0_zpsufcporwh.png"/></a>

looks good
 
herring - based on that little snippet, it looks like you have a model of this shape too? Did you replicate based on my dimensions?
 
I don't really have an "in" in the market, but if you get me a STP or IGS copy of your model, I can reach out to a few different people I know that do this. I agree that this may be high. It isn't just material cost. This will require allot of time in the printer. Tying up a very expensive machine.

They will also be able to tell you if it is structurally sound. It may be a little thin walled. On the model you showed, how tall is each section.
 
Back
Top