Lets talk about Vodka/sugar dosing

Status
Not open for further replies.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12440152#post12440152 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by OnlyCrimson
Zedar, wow, a whole cup? No bloom thats strange.

Oh no, what I mean by nothing being affected is nothing died. I had huge bloom. I was skimming a 1 inch slime off the surface water of the sump for two days. And the rockwork had long strings of slime coming off them.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12440193#post12440193 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by stony_corals
Are you running the zeolites in a reactor, or passively in a bag?

Interesting.... assumption- a particular nutrient level will require x amount of bacteria to reduce these nutrient levels to ULN status. I don't know how important relative density levels are (reactor vs. no reactor) as ultimately, the goal is ULN. If the bacteria are less dense and more spread out throughout the tank, but the result is the same.

Zedar, how long before you became ULN with your hybrid approach?

I have not experienced this, but has anyone running a simply carbon dosing regime, experienced K depletion? We still have not ruled out Jaime's statement that K depletion is the result of bacteria density levels vs. another reason (i.e. ion exchange due to zeolites).

jamie might still be right.

I run matrix in a reactor. Dont underestimate the surface area of matrix. Its possible that matrix is just as good as zeovit at harboring bacteria. As a matter of fact its possible that matrix is a zeolite.

heres what they say about it on seachems website.


Matrixâ"žÂ¢ is a highly porous media designed to provide exceptionally efficient biofiltration for single site removal of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate from freshwater, marine, and reef aquaria. Each liter of Matrixâ"žÂ¢ provides over 160,000 cm2 (170 sq. ft.) of surface, equivalent to over 40 L (10 gallons) of typical plastic ball media!

Aerobic bacteria grow on the pitted external surfaces of Matrixâ"žÂ¢ and convert ammonia to nitrite and nitrite to nitrate.

These pores which cover Matrixâ"žÂ¢ are home to anaerobic bacteria.

Anaerobic bacteria convert nitrate into nitrogen gas, which is then expelled at the tank surface


Sound familiar?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12440437#post12440437 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jamesdawson
Zedar,

I have tried both the Zeovit and FM K test kits and the FM is substanially different and better considering both are turbidity-based tests. It comes with a K reference and it takes the guessing out of the equation. Even Dr. Mac was complaining about the Zeo kit's endpoint is a guess.

IMHO, James

Thanks you confirmed what was rumored.

Now can anyone tell me where i can buy the FM kit?
 
John,
Descriptions may be similar, but the materials don't resemble one another.
Matrix is porous and a solid color similar to a glass or a volcanic material.
Zeovit is a mix of colors and sizes and is much smoother. I don't think the Martrix has the adsorbsion or ion exchange capacities of zeo type rocks. My guess is that Matrix has a much larger surface area, and that's a good thing.
 
John,
Descriptions may be similar, but the materials don't resemble one another.
Matrix is porous and a solid color similar to a glass or a volcanic material.
Zeovit is a mix of colors and sizes and is much smoother. I don't think the Martrix has the adsorbsion or ion exchange capacities of zeo type rocks. My guess is that Matrix has a much larger surface area, and that's a good thing.
 
Well, I was examining some Matrix last week explaining it to a customer at the LFS, where I DO NOT work, and it is an artificial medium, most probobly a glass, such as Siporax. It does have a life span of about 6 months, after which the pores are too clogged to be effective.

I would expect that it works in the same manners as zeoliths, but is not an ion exchange material. Now, that branch gets pretty thin as there are many synthetic zeoliths, such as the ones used in instant cooling beer barrels (very practical application) and I have never seen them. I have assumed they would look similar to natural zeoliths, therefore like a fine gravel-clay. Matrix does not look like that.
 
Heres the response to a matrix question posted in the FAQ section of seachems website.

Q: I have a few new customers that are telling me that Aquarium Pharmaceutical's product, called Bio Chem Stars - - is better because the same amount Bio Chem Stars compared to Matrix will handle a much larger amount of water.
A: 1 L of Matrix treats 100 gallons and 1 container of the bio chem stars with 20 stars treats 100 gallons. Both cost exactly the same (at Dr. Fosters web site). Also the information on the Aquarium pharm website says the pore size is in the 50-70 micron range and they do not specifically mention denitryifing bacteria... that coupled with the fact that Matrix has a pore size in the 3-30 micron range (and it does support anaerobic denitrifying bacteria) strongly suggests that the bio chem stars only support aerobic bacteria, not anaerobic... so it only does half of what Matrix does.

 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12440787#post12440787 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kkris
John,
Descriptions may be similar, but the materials don't resemble one another.
Matrix is porous and a solid color similar to a glass or a volcanic material.
Zeovit is a mix of colors and sizes and is much smoother. I don't think the Martrix has the adsorbsion or ion exchange capacities of zeo type rocks. My guess is that Matrix has a much larger surface area, and that's a good thing.

Ken,

You know you already told me this :) I forgot you compared the two:)
Hows the tank doing?
 
Last edited:
Marketing is...well...marketing. I'm not so sure I believe any label other than the one I have on my bottle of vodka...and the only reason I trust it is because I give one shot to the fish and one shot to my lips.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12442457#post12442457 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by miwoodar
Marketing is...well...marketing. I'm not so sure I believe any label other than the one I have on my bottle of vodka...and the only reason I trust it is because I give one shot to the fish and one shot to my lips.

Haha, 1 for you and 1 for me.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12434553#post12434553 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Kolognekoral
An interesting side note on zeoliths for marine tanks and K+, one of the ions released by the zeolith in its ion-exchange is potassium. I had wondered if it could adsorb potassium, but this is apparently not the case.

I too was wondering this. As zeolith is composed of many differing ion exchange materials there is a strong probability that one of these is essentially depleting potassium. I don't know if these zeoliths are mixtures, if so, the one producing potassium may not produce enough for the others that are uptaking it. Just a thought.

Furthermore, I do not believe I have a potassium deficiency within my tank. Use of vsv has proven itself useful in efficient production of skimmate, reduction of N/P, and coral coloration. The coloration though is not washed out as in zeovite tanks, which is attributed to a lack of potassium within the water column (NSW has a potassium level of 388ppm). Bacteria would take up potassium and if skimmed as complete organisms would take that with them. But lets think of the potassium being added through food additions? This must come close if not outweigh the skimmate?
 
Well I dont use Zeo and i was low. So maybe its the reactor that makes it more aggressive, more bacteria maybe?
 
Other than bananas, I know of no other food high in potassium. Fish flesh does contain quite a bit and may be the main source for marine carnivores. It seems to be a basic metabolite that in aquaeous environments is absorbed directly from the water and not ingested ny most smaller reef organisms. Upon examining fish food labels I find no mention of potassium, although other basics are listed. I can't beleive there is none in the food, but maybe not enough to end up on the label, or just not considered a selling point. Without good data, we can't assume one way or the other. Damn!

The zeovit zeolith is a mixture, but of what , I do not know. Mixture could refer only to the sizes or the composition or both.
 
I guess a little off topic lol, but lots of foods have much higher levels of potassium than bananas (potassium per gram of food), fish included. A baked potato has 2x the potassium of a banana. Half a filet of Halibut is also 2x a banana. But like you mention, fish is high in potassium but doesn't end up on a fish food label... is it because the amount is negligible after processing, or that it's just not taken into consideration?
 
Last edited:
I'm off to the store to buy bananas and potatos. I'm thinking that I will start with 1 banana per 25 gallons thrice per week and 2 potatos per 25 gallons on the off days.

Hmmm, maybe not :lol:. Maybe after I get a test kit for potassium though. :spin2: This is the lounge, right?

Zedar, any new pictures of your corals?
 
I read a post by someone once who put banana slices into their tank, tied to a rock with a rubber band, for their tangs to eat. Bananas being high in potassium was the reason given for doing that (honest).
 
Psam, yeah, there are other foods with high K+, but mashed potatoes are tough to feed an aquarium! :D :D I was thinking of what to feed the fish with K+. Canarygirl hit it! I feed bananas to my Zanclus in particular, but all the fish seem to like 'em :p :bounce2: :bounce1:

Boy, we are getting a bit off-topic:artist:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top