They did have some very nice pieces. I wonder how they look under normal hobbyist lighting. I only say that because it appeared that they, and many others, were using a lot of actinic. But boy they sure looked good at the swap.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14764667#post14764667 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Esquare They did have some very nice pieces. I wonder how they look under normal hobbyist lighting. I only say that because it appeared that they, and many others, were using a lot of actinic. But boy they sure looked good at the swap.
Yeah, I was not a big fan of what some of the vendors were doing with just having actinics. Just about anything looks great under actinics. I would not buy a piece of coral without seeing what it would look like under normal lighting.
It sure is hard to decide, especially on those higher ticket items, without knowing if what you're seeing is a good representation of the product. I do, however, understand a sellers desire to present his product in the most favorable light.........oh man, did I just say that "favorable light". I should be PUNished.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14764706#post14764706 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Esquare .........oh man, did I just say that "favorable light". I should be PUNished.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.