serpentman
part time superhero
Honestly, I am a bit surprised at everyone's reactions since this essentially does nothing but benefit the club and those that participate, which is the goal....right? What I really think everyone is upset about is the decreased odds of winning.
Although the past several years have been great, I think the general thought was that it would be nice to put a little additional in the coffers for the next board so that perhaps we could try some new and different things that are more capital intensive such as a field trip, etc. To call it greedy is a gross misstatement since the intention is to use additional $ for the members. As the economy declines, we are going to have to count less and less on the generosity of other's donations, etc.
I do agree that the club doesn't need to make 3-4x the amount. However, since the club will have to pay retail for the item, it will likely only net 1x the amount. Perhaps we should consider a time limit. If all 200 don't sell by X date, we revert the proceeds to a 50/50 raffle. Just a thought....
Although the past several years have been great, I think the general thought was that it would be nice to put a little additional in the coffers for the next board so that perhaps we could try some new and different things that are more capital intensive such as a field trip, etc. To call it greedy is a gross misstatement since the intention is to use additional $ for the members. As the economy declines, we are going to have to count less and less on the generosity of other's donations, etc.
I do agree that the club doesn't need to make 3-4x the amount. However, since the club will have to pay retail for the item, it will likely only net 1x the amount. Perhaps we should consider a time limit. If all 200 don't sell by X date, we revert the proceeds to a 50/50 raffle. Just a thought....