Mandragen
New member
Any idea how many I would need for the Solana 34g? 20x20x20. I am new to sw and want to do a soft coral and fish tank with LEDs.
unless you have a lot of money you just need to spend, these are overkill for softies and fish.
Any idea how many I would need for the Solana 34g? 20x20x20. I am new to sw and want to do a soft coral and fish tank with LEDs.
Thanks for the update. Do you still get a shimmer effect with these optics?
The electronic setup looks really clean and modular.
i like the end shot, shows a pretty impressive spread for a 48x24inch tank!!
![]()
Here's a few more pics w/ 100 degree optics, like I said, much better and I think w/ third unit, will really fill out the tank...
![]()
So, as you can see pretty neat looking and coverage is much better. Less heat, less fan noise and pretty solid spread from these tiny units. The units are roughly 9" x 9", but densely packed and quite solid in construction.
A neat thing is that although you can only set 8 time points for each program, the intensity does not just jump from one timepoint to the next, it slowly ramps up or down depending on the next time point so you don't get a sudden jump in intensity from one time point to the next.
Cheers,
John
Can you please advise John, is the top photo using 2x 250w HQI + 2x 54w T5 = 608Watts
And the bottom pic is 120watt LED?
If this is the case, all I can say is WOW - thats 80% power savings!!
Kind regards,
George
Looks like a big difference between the 70 and 100 degree optics. The coverage looks better and appears to have more blue like your Mh set up. I ordered a quad module for my 70 gallong high. The tank is 36x 27 x 18. Judging from your coverage on a 48" tank with 2 modules I am feeling the quad is an overkill for my tank. However I plan on upgrading to a 300 gallon in the near future so will be needing to buy more lights . I have a DIY LED set up but it would look aesthetically unpleasent next to the mazarra.
rufio173,
Thanks so much for being a Guinea Pig for the rest of us. This is the #1 reason I didn't believe the hype and decided to wait a few more years until this is more mainstream and things are figured out more. No thanks, I'll stick to my 150 watt 14,000k MH and two actinic T5HO over my 24x24x24" 60 gallon cube for a while longer. I tried LEDs, I burned all my LPS while my SPS thrived.
thanks John,
how deep is your tank?
16" so depth penetration is not a huge issue for me.![]()
Rufio, can you provide some dimensions of the frame mount? I'm particularly interested in the height from the trim on the tank to the top of the frame mount and from the top of the tank to the bottom of lights assuming they are level. I ordered five modules for my 72"x18"x24" 135 and I need to build a new canopy. I probably will not use the frame mount despite ordering one but I would like to hang my lights at the same height and need to build the canopy to accommodate. Thanks
Yes, you are correct.![]()
But, I really would like the third LED module as that will probably give roughly equal coverage to my previous lighting schema.
I am happier w/ the 100 degree optics, although honestly given the that LEDs are PAR beasts, I could probably go wider on the optics w/out sacrificing growth, but we will see. I really wish I had an apogee light meter.
It'd be easy to switch my lighting out, since I just suspended my MH setup higher above the LED lights, so I could I just drop them down for a quick PAR comparison at different spots in tank. I'd really love to see what the PAR is one the outskirts of the tank.
Cheers,
John