GT_Jacket
New member
As one that is just starting to get more active in the club I will say that you guys have confused me to no end.
I had an emergency that kept me from making this meeting. Everything I had read said the purpose of the meeting was to NOMINATE people for the BOD positions and that VOTING would be carried out over the following week. Though it felt like more than one person was nominated for at least one of the positions, settling on the current BOD by "default" is fine.
With that said, Bill has recently (prior to becoming president) alluded in multiple threads that decisions will not be made without a vote. Since it was not expected that the new BOD would be in place I did not expect that anything would be voted on at the meeting.
I'm fine with whatever direction you guys go. Must be present to vote, only vote if BOD is split, only vote if > $XXX, etc.
I'm just pointing out that I can see where all the confusion is coming from...
Brett
I had an emergency that kept me from making this meeting. Everything I had read said the purpose of the meeting was to NOMINATE people for the BOD positions and that VOTING would be carried out over the following week. Though it felt like more than one person was nominated for at least one of the positions, settling on the current BOD by "default" is fine.
With that said, Bill has recently (prior to becoming president) alluded in multiple threads that decisions will not be made without a vote. Since it was not expected that the new BOD would be in place I did not expect that anything would be voted on at the meeting.
I'm fine with whatever direction you guys go. Must be present to vote, only vote if BOD is split, only vote if > $XXX, etc.
I'm just pointing out that I can see where all the confusion is coming from...
Brett